GH-98831: Refactor generate_cases.py #99408
Conversation
Had to refactor the parser a bit for this.
Replace Py_INCREF() and Py_XINCREF() with Py_NewRef() and Py_XNewRef() in C files of the Objects/ directory.
Replace Py_INCREF() and Py_XINCREF() with Py_NewRef() and Py_XNewRef() in Objects/dictobject.c.
…thon#99280) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
… venvs (pythonGH-99206) Check to see if `base_executable` exists. If it does not, attempt to use known alternative names of the python binary to find an executable in the path specified by `home`. If no alternative is found, previous behavior is preserved. Signed-off-by: Vincent Fazio <vfazio@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vincent Fazio <vfazio@gmail.com>
python#99271) Also mark those opcodes that have no stack effect as such. Co-authored-by: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@gmail.com>
gvanrossum
force-pushed
the
cases-refactor
branch
from
8088808 to
bf10431
Compare
This was a bin subtle, esp. BINARY_SUBSCR_DICT (which plays games with refcounts) and BINARY_SUBSCR_GETITEM (which ends with a goto).
|
My expectation at this point is that converting the majority of instructions to non-legacy form (cache and stack effects) will be a big project, even if we skip opcodes needing arrays or conditional stack effects. The good news is that it can be parallelized -- each family can be done independently from any others, so anyone who wants to can pick a family and convert it, as long as it doesn't require fixing the generator (it's probably best if I stay on top of that). I don't know how much we need to do before we can start experimenting with "macro" opcodes (see faster-cpython/ideas#491). Possibly we can start with an example like the one Mark wrote up in the DSL definition. |
|
I won't attempt a review of this PR, but a few comments on how I'd like the tool(s) to look.
A possible design:
Then, when we want to generate a trace interpreter, a register interpreter, compiler front-end, etc. we can re-use the tokenizer, parser, and formatter. |
|
Thanks, I'll try to use that as a north star. In the meantime I am hoping to keep things working the way they were as much as possible to avoid disrupting other work. I have half the analyzer in this refactor, what's missing is a design for the IR to target. |
|
I'm starting over from scratch now GH-99313 is merged. |
Consider this after GH-99313.