Kevin's Reviews > Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist
Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist
by
by

Kevin's review
bookshelves: econ-general, 1-how-the-world-works, 2-brilliant-intros-101, econ-environment, econ-value-labour, theory-systems
Jan 23, 2022
bookshelves: econ-general, 1-how-the-world-works, 2-brilliant-intros-101, econ-environment, econ-value-labour, theory-systems
Confronting 21st century crises with revolutionary reforms…
Highlights:
--I have high standards for this topic (21st century economics); this accessible overview may one day reach my “bedtime stories” status (not joking):
-Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works—and How It Fails
-Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present
-Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World
-Debt: The First 5,000 Years
1) Structural crises:
--The first 2 concepts I look for here:
a) Logic of capitalism: production is driven by profits (endless private accumulation of money-power) rather than social needs (social needs without money go unaddressed; this neglect spreads to the entire economy during recessions as confidence in profits evaporate). The logic of the market commodifies social relations: market exchange-value (between strangers maximizing gains) are fetishized, obscuring use-value and social relations (labour in production/reproduction, ecological, commons, etc.)
b) Property rights of capitalism: market commodification expand beyond exchange of common goods (pre-capitalist "societies with markets") into peculiar markets of land/labour/money (capitalism: "market society"). These feature fictitious commodities since humans/nature/purchasing power are not produced for market exchange.
--Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works—and How It Fails introduces this elegantly. Once such structural logic is uprooted from liberalism’s naturalization (“human nature”, as if history and social/class distinctions do not exist) and placed on a global historical scale, the connections to crises are clear: Financial casinos fetishizing market prices to oblivion… industrial overproduction amidst global maldistribution churning through global labour and ecologies… social relations/imagination reduced to consumerism/addiction…
“Capitalist production, therefore, develops technology, and the combining together of various processes into a social whole, only by sapping the original sources of all wealth - the soil and the labourer.” -Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1
--Raworth’s writing is whole-heartedly accessible (attention to public communication, including visuals and figures-of-speech); a more academic delivery is Keen’s The New Economics: A Manifesto. The bits connecting theory to history are fun: John Stuart Mill shifting from classical political economy’s social goals to abstract “natural laws”; “economic man” and “equilibrium” as the foundations of mainstream (Neoclassical) economics, erasing class/gender/political struggle/economic volatility etc.; Kuznets' GNP originating in measuring war production to later being adopted as a measure of national “economic health”; Kuznets Curve’s supposed rising-then-falling inequality in industrialized countries then being adopted for post-WWII economic growth developmentalism (note: especially against communist decolonization), etc.
…However, we need to be careful of taking too idealist a position (i.e. assuming ideas drive history, without carefully considering the materialist context/structural logic/interactions). Otherwise, the framing becomes too focused on bad ideas (ex. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism’s focus on twerp-turned-war-criminal Milton Friedman’s free market fundamentalism) rather than on structural crises that were managed with convenientlybad useful ideas: US’s post-WWII global plan (dollar-gold convertibility) falling apart due to US’s genocidal war spending (annihilating Korea/Vietnam) draining US gold reserves, thus pivoting to “Neoliberalism”: unleash Wall Street to retain economic hegemony while breaking the domestic welfare class-compromise and derailing Third World industrialization:
-The Global Minotaur: America, the True Origins of the Financial Crisis and the Future of the World Economy
-Super Imperialism: The Origin and Fundamentals of U.S. World Dominance
-Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present
-The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World
2) Revolutionary reforms:
--Revolutions are not simply an event; they are a process to build social trust, imagination and capabilities. “Reformist” reforms obstruct this process through short-term symptomatic relief, divide-and-rule, etc. “Revolutionary” reforms facilitate this process. Thankfully, Raworth is much clearer on this than fellow progressive Mariana Mazzucato’s Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism.
--Inspired by the complex systems science of Donella H. Meadows (Thinking in Systems: A Primer), Raworth distinguishes the lower (weaker) leverage points (for system behavior change) involved in reformist reforms (internalizing externalities within market prices, tax redistribution, tiered pricing, quotas) vs. the higher leverage points of:
a) Changing system goals: replacing “Economic Growth” (convenient for capitalist endless accumulation as distribution can be ignored) with “Doughnut Economics”, which combines the social needs rhetoric of the UN Social Development Goals as the baseline with the planetary boundaries of Earth Systems science (see diagram: https://images.gr-assets.com/photos/1... ) ...Now, be warned of the liberal imperialist biases of Western technocrats like the “Limits to Growth” pioneers of Earth Systems Science and their fallacy of “overpopulation” (critiqued in Too Many People?: Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis). And once again, to avoid vulgar idealism, changing system goals requires changing the aforementioned structural system logic/property rights.
b) Changing reinforcing feedback loops (think exponential growth) into balancing feedback loops: we return to capitalist structural logic/property rights. Wealth accumulation of the following capitalist property rights is hidden by the mainstream focus on income via wage labour:
i) Land via landlordism/vast inheritance vs. land value tax (to capture windfall gains of social/Commons value-creation).
ii) Money via private bank debt-money creation/speculation vs. various ways to make money into a public utility (Can We Avoid Another Financial Crisis?, The Bubble and Beyond). Finance is such an efficient Ponzi scheme that it is the pinnacle of runaway reinforcing feedback loops.
iii) Enterprise via shareholding (external ownership) speculation vs. stakeholder fixed-return bonds/workers self-directed enterprises (Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism).
iv) Technology/information via winner-take-all Big Tech privatizing social information, socializing costs while privatizing rewards vs. intellectual Commons/social dividend on technology/royalties & State equity for State-funded R&D, etc.
The Missing:
--Like clockwork, yet another progressive not spelling out the economics of imperialism (despite a clear opportunity during the critique of liberal economic-growth developmentalism), thus missing the nuances of decolonization in the real world which (using systems thinking) does indeed affect Global North activism (both to understand how our elites will act and to broaden our own social imagination for change/solidarity).
--Indeed, I have yet to find an accessible overview that synthesizes all of the above with imperialism. Luckily, I have you covered with supplements:
1) Intro to imperialism: The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions
2) ...with a bit more economic theory: The Agrarian Question in the Neoliberal Era: Primitive Accumulation and the Peasantry
3) …with more environmentalism: Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World and A People’s Green New Deal
4) …dive into economic theory: Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present
Highlights:
--I have high standards for this topic (21st century economics); this accessible overview may one day reach my “bedtime stories” status (not joking):
-Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works—and How It Fails
-Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present
-Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World
-Debt: The First 5,000 Years
1) Structural crises:
--The first 2 concepts I look for here:
a) Logic of capitalism: production is driven by profits (endless private accumulation of money-power) rather than social needs (social needs without money go unaddressed; this neglect spreads to the entire economy during recessions as confidence in profits evaporate). The logic of the market commodifies social relations: market exchange-value (between strangers maximizing gains) are fetishized, obscuring use-value and social relations (labour in production/reproduction, ecological, commons, etc.)
b) Property rights of capitalism: market commodification expand beyond exchange of common goods (pre-capitalist "societies with markets") into peculiar markets of land/labour/money (capitalism: "market society"). These feature fictitious commodities since humans/nature/purchasing power are not produced for market exchange.
--Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works—and How It Fails introduces this elegantly. Once such structural logic is uprooted from liberalism’s naturalization (“human nature”, as if history and social/class distinctions do not exist) and placed on a global historical scale, the connections to crises are clear: Financial casinos fetishizing market prices to oblivion… industrial overproduction amidst global maldistribution churning through global labour and ecologies… social relations/imagination reduced to consumerism/addiction…
“Capitalist production, therefore, develops technology, and the combining together of various processes into a social whole, only by sapping the original sources of all wealth - the soil and the labourer.” -Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1
--Raworth’s writing is whole-heartedly accessible (attention to public communication, including visuals and figures-of-speech); a more academic delivery is Keen’s The New Economics: A Manifesto. The bits connecting theory to history are fun: John Stuart Mill shifting from classical political economy’s social goals to abstract “natural laws”; “economic man” and “equilibrium” as the foundations of mainstream (Neoclassical) economics, erasing class/gender/political struggle/economic volatility etc.; Kuznets' GNP originating in measuring war production to later being adopted as a measure of national “economic health”; Kuznets Curve’s supposed rising-then-falling inequality in industrialized countries then being adopted for post-WWII economic growth developmentalism (note: especially against communist decolonization), etc.
…However, we need to be careful of taking too idealist a position (i.e. assuming ideas drive history, without carefully considering the materialist context/structural logic/interactions). Otherwise, the framing becomes too focused on bad ideas (ex. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism’s focus on twerp-turned-war-criminal Milton Friedman’s free market fundamentalism) rather than on structural crises that were managed with conveniently
-The Global Minotaur: America, the True Origins of the Financial Crisis and the Future of the World Economy
-Super Imperialism: The Origin and Fundamentals of U.S. World Dominance
-Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present
-The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World
2) Revolutionary reforms:
--Revolutions are not simply an event; they are a process to build social trust, imagination and capabilities. “Reformist” reforms obstruct this process through short-term symptomatic relief, divide-and-rule, etc. “Revolutionary” reforms facilitate this process. Thankfully, Raworth is much clearer on this than fellow progressive Mariana Mazzucato’s Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism.
--Inspired by the complex systems science of Donella H. Meadows (Thinking in Systems: A Primer), Raworth distinguishes the lower (weaker) leverage points (for system behavior change) involved in reformist reforms (internalizing externalities within market prices, tax redistribution, tiered pricing, quotas) vs. the higher leverage points of:
a) Changing system goals: replacing “Economic Growth” (convenient for capitalist endless accumulation as distribution can be ignored) with “Doughnut Economics”, which combines the social needs rhetoric of the UN Social Development Goals as the baseline with the planetary boundaries of Earth Systems science (see diagram: https://images.gr-assets.com/photos/1... ) ...Now, be warned of the liberal imperialist biases of Western technocrats like the “Limits to Growth” pioneers of Earth Systems Science and their fallacy of “overpopulation” (critiqued in Too Many People?: Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis). And once again, to avoid vulgar idealism, changing system goals requires changing the aforementioned structural system logic/property rights.
b) Changing reinforcing feedback loops (think exponential growth) into balancing feedback loops: we return to capitalist structural logic/property rights. Wealth accumulation of the following capitalist property rights is hidden by the mainstream focus on income via wage labour:
i) Land via landlordism/vast inheritance vs. land value tax (to capture windfall gains of social/Commons value-creation).
ii) Money via private bank debt-money creation/speculation vs. various ways to make money into a public utility (Can We Avoid Another Financial Crisis?, The Bubble and Beyond). Finance is such an efficient Ponzi scheme that it is the pinnacle of runaway reinforcing feedback loops.
iii) Enterprise via shareholding (external ownership) speculation vs. stakeholder fixed-return bonds/workers self-directed enterprises (Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism).
iv) Technology/information via winner-take-all Big Tech privatizing social information, socializing costs while privatizing rewards vs. intellectual Commons/social dividend on technology/royalties & State equity for State-funded R&D, etc.
The Missing:
--Like clockwork, yet another progressive not spelling out the economics of imperialism (despite a clear opportunity during the critique of liberal economic-growth developmentalism), thus missing the nuances of decolonization in the real world which (using systems thinking) does indeed affect Global North activism (both to understand how our elites will act and to broaden our own social imagination for change/solidarity).
--Indeed, I have yet to find an accessible overview that synthesizes all of the above with imperialism. Luckily, I have you covered with supplements:
1) Intro to imperialism: The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions
2) ...with a bit more economic theory: The Agrarian Question in the Neoliberal Era: Primitive Accumulation and the Peasantry
3) …with more environmentalism: Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World and A People’s Green New Deal
4) …dive into economic theory: Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Doughnut Economics.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 10, 2018
– Shelved
July 26, 2021
–
Started Reading
January 23, 2022
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)
date
newest »


Haven't read Raworth yet, but defiinitely up on my reading list.
I'm doing a course in Health Innovation and Policy, this week we're doing holistic health policies that go outside the ..."
Great topic Leopold!
Working in Western capitalist welfare state's "public health", health promotion + disease prevention is overwhelmed by our capitalist economy driven by cancerous growth, which requires addictions (i.e. consumerism). So, capitalist public health is mostly just part of the overall ineffective clean-up/maintenance.
My city has 2 official public health emergencies, COVID and overdose. The overdose crisis has been longstanding despite Vancouver having some of the most progressive harm-reduction healthcare policies in the world. Why? Because even the most enlightened harm-reduction (decriminalize drugs, safe injection sites, detox) cannot stem the flood of new/relapsing addicts coming from the capitalist economy's commodity fetishism addiction (housing prices, financial debt/stress/dispossession, inequality, propertied rent-seeking while wages are unlivable, consumerism, competition over cooperation, individualism, social isolation, absentee parents, etc.), which needs to be addressed to reach sobriety.
A useful contrast is with socialist public health (basically every socialist revolution), which operate with a fraction of the resources/costs but are integrated with the social needs causes (socioeconomic justice esp. land/housing/inequality/meaningful jobs/social roles, building community social relations, etc.). If we want to compartmentalize things and talk specifically "healthcare" (something bourgeois education does, perpetually avoiding root issues), then the Cuban model leads the world in emphasizing access to primary health, detailed consultations with lasting relationships rather than the rushed, fragmented capitalist mess churning patients through technological assessments rather than accessible/lasting patient-provider relationships.
So, we already know how to directly address social needs like healthcare. We just cannot make a business out of it, so we don't do it. As for "circular economy", at its best it is a component to dismantling capitalist power/irrationality and redesigning our finance/production/distribution with a focus on ecological boundaries, which for sure has many spillover benefits. At its worst, it is a technocratic buzzword that obscures class/social struggle.

'integrated with the social needs causes (socioeconomic justice esp. land/housing/inequality/meaningful jobs/social roles, building community social relations, etc.)'
Every policy becomes a health policy in some fashion.
Maybe circular economy is the wrong word...I was thinking along the line of African socialist Ujamaa, i.e. 'Co-operative economics' rather than 'struggle'. I think where circularity comes into the mix is to build an eco(nomic)- system that takes care of its own waste, and is sustainable, as someone like Nair (2018, The Sustainable State) would outline.
Thanks for your thoughts :)
And good luck with the public health emergencies

'integrated with the social needs causes (socioeconomic just..."
Makes sense. I definitely wasn't disputing your interest in the theoretical possibilities with the general idea (after all, I gave Raworth's book 5 stars), which has always been foundational to ecology: reciprocity.
I'm just bogged down by liberal technocratic thumb-twiddling buzzwords like "circular economy" that I've been reading, which dilute such ideas into trivial recycling with no relevance to the real-world's time and space (scale/exponential growth/tipping points/fragility), let alone social struggle. These liberal recycling schemes are barely worth the bullshit jobs that envisioned them since we will be neck-deep in escalating climate and ecological crises, where such numerous disruptions to the finance/production/distribution/infrastructure/social services that we (and the schemes) take for granted will leave us with nationalist war-time economies and rogue geo-engineering. I can't imagine much reduction in pollution and improvements in healthcare outcomes in this reality.

Recycling is not meant on the individual scale - don't box those shadows Kevin, stay with me - what I mean is an engineering from the ground-up that ensures that society, and expressly companies do not create waste that is not meaningfully re-used.
Nair believes that the only way out, particularly for non-Western, say, Asian countries, is to drastically limit access to and control the country's natural resources. I.e. a strong state is needed, though his definition of 'strong' is slightly peculiar.
Do you think democratic processes can prevent the climate cataclysm? And if so, how?
WRL

Recycling is not meant on the individ..."
Good call with "green growth", there's always something worse :)
For sure, I didn't mean individual consumer-side recycling, that's already implemented. I mean liberal "circular economy" trying to design in reuse/recycling of materials into its production/distribution/consumption/waste stages ("engineering from the ground-up"):
-The "reuse" side might have more leverage, when combined with the related social changes (reviving and expanding the Commons, banning advertising and planned obsolescence, etc.). Not sure how quickly this can scale and its impact.
-The "recycle" of materials, that's always been seen as the most difficult and weakest leverage point (refuse, reduce, reuse, recycle). Energy will always be lost the longer the production/distribution stages are stretched and the recycling stage itself uses energy.
...Now, liberal technocrats are focused on industrial commodities (ex. recycling minerals from electronics), but I'm quite interested in how dismantling industrial agriculture and re-localizing it via agroecology will do for several key Earth Systems planetary boundaries (soil fertility, nitrogen/phosphorus cycles, biodiversity, carbon sinks etc.). Once again, not sure time.
-RE: Nair: "reduce", there we go! Thanks for the reference. How do you mean "particularly for non-Western"?
-RE: prevention: it depends on how we define "crisis", but from what I've read that's most convincing we are already locked into some bad times and it's now damage control. Given rising crises, I'm much less worried about "capitalist realism" perpetual status quo; I'm more concerned with how Left (your answer) vs. Right respond, similar to WWII.

Market Formation in a Global Health Transition) and democratising health innovation:
Nair's book is mostly concerned with the thematic of 'sustainable development', i.e. how to improve people's living standards in developing countries while also not wracking the planet in the process. The Western model of development is deeply unsustainable, so he is looking at alternatives.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
Note: I only read the intro and chapter 5 for my 'Creative Bureaucracy' course. I would not say I have a perfect grasp on his ideas, merely a fleeting one.
Left, right, top, bottom. The climate may well be indiscriminate.

Cheers Brittney, glad you found them useful!


I was recommended Bernie's latest book, It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism. I think it's crucial to keep an eye on how the best communicators are describing how real-world capitalism works:
i) Rhetoric: how to contend with all the Red Scare fear-mongering, as well as capitalism-is-human-nature normalization. On this, Bernie's latest is really tapping into morality, inspired by MLK (esp. The Radical King).
ii) Content: how to bring big picture structural perspectives to life. This reminds me of the struggles of popular science and how messy this is with big business/big media (climate change, vaccines, etc.):
-I Think You'll Find It's a Bit More Complicated Than That
-Bad Science: Quacks, Hacks, and Big Pharma Flacks
-Thinking in Systems: A Primer
-On Raworth, I was definitely impressed with the big difference in radical/systemic scope compared to what I've read of her colleague Mazzucato, so I'll have to revisit this...


Hi Lingg, that's a great question that I think about all the time, so it's always relevant! In fact, this topic was brought up recently, see the comments (starts at "message 27") in this review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
In summary, I'm actually a slow reader (meticulous habits). I try to balance the desire to read faster (too many books to read) vs. the fear of rushing and missing important thought processes (why rush if I have to re-read?).
Currently:
0) Before starting, I'm trying to be increasingly picky with which books I select, the must-reads for a single lifetime. Thus, I catolog extensively and sometimes read Table of Contents to get an idea.
1) Most texts (unless with many visual diagrams) I switch to audio format (either audiobook version or text-to-speech) so I can listen to on commutes/chores etc. I learned English with the help of audiobooks so I'm comfortable with the format. I can "read" much more.
2) Take rough notes on my phone.
3) After finishing, I re-write my rough notes to make my own formating structure (esp. for important books). I'll also use the text version to follow up on quotes, citations etc.
4) Finally, take the best from my formatted notes and write a review. (3) and (4) can be more time-consuming than (1) and (2), but they ensure I really dive into the book.
Haven't read Raworth yet, but defiinitely up on my reading list.
I'm doing a course in Health Innovation and Policy, this week we're doing holistic health policies that go outside the direct reach of medicines and hospital administration.
Was reading a WHO article from 2014 and began wondering if, as someone working in the health space, you also found that a circular economy is conductive to people's health through, among other things, a reduction in industrial pollution, fewer vehicles -> healthier lifestyles, and the adoption of 'better' (bio-)fuels and waste management, etc.