Josiah's Reviews > Pre-Suasion: A Revolutionary Way to Influence and Persuade

Pre-Suasion by Robert B. Cialdini
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
794544
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: kindle

If I had read this book a few years ago I probably would have thought it was fantastic. Now I rate it as largely worthless.

Why the change? The book largely relies on so-called "priming" research, which is the idea that our decisions are substantially influenced by seemingly trivial elements of one's background environment. For example, in Pre-Suasion we are told that customers are more likely to buy French wine if there is French music playing in the background. Similarly, worker productivity shoots up if they are shown a photo of a runner winning a race, people express more conservative political opinions on questionnaires that include a miniature American flag in the corner, and Parisian men are more likely to help a woman retrieve a stolen phone if they had previously been asked how to get to Valentine Street (because the word Valentine primed them with associations of romance and chivalry).

If these findings seem hard to believe, you may be onto something. Priming has been a hot topic in pop psychology in recent years, but attempts to replicate the findings of many priming studies have failed. As far back as 2012 Daniel Kahneman (who won a Nobel prize for his work in psychology) said that priming research had become the "poster child for doubts about the integrity of psychological research."

Yet while the problems with priming research have been known for years, there is zero hint in Pre-Suasion that the findings being presented are questionable. This means that either Cialdini is unaware of these criticisms (which would be bad), or that he is aware but he decided not to mention it because it would undercut the thrust of his argument (which would be worse). Either way, you should not let a book based on such questionable research influence you.
132 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Pre-Suasion.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 6, 2016 – Started Reading
September 6, 2016 – Shelved
September 6, 2016 – Shelved as: kindle
October 15, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Jason you should base wherever or not you but into it by wherever or not you've seen it successfully used, not how many studies there are. I have seen these ideas used and used them myself to achieve astounding effects.


message 2: by Nahal (new)

Nahal What would you recommend ?


message 3: by Dennis (new) - added it

Dennis Fischman Can you give me a citation for the Kahneman quotation, and/or the research you mention?


Josiah Here is the Kahneman source:

http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.6...


message 5: by Nickolas (new) - added it

Nickolas D'Apice So you do not think priming works at all? I believe it to be a strong influence. For example, having people recite the Ten Commandments would grant a better chance of them being honest.


Nelson Zagalo Kahneman says "Count me as a general believer." His book has an entire chapter on the matter. I agree with you that this new book from Cialdini adds little to nothing new, however it doesn't point any problem in terms of the priming effect theory, on the contrary.


Josiah Kahneman did write positively about priming in his 2011 book Thinking Fast and Slow. The critical quote from my review was written after that.


Nelson Zagalo The quote "Count me as a general believer." was taken from the letter at Nature, you referred to.


Josiah It's one thing to be a "general believer" in priming (whatever that means). It's quite another to write an entire book on the subject without discussing the serious problems raised about the research.


Josiah FWIW, Kahneman yesterday made additional critical comments about priming research, along with a mea culpa for how he treated the issue in his book:

https://replicationindex.wordpress.co...


message 11: by Don (new) - rated it 5 stars

Don Sevcik Jason wrote: "you should base wherever or not you but into it by wherever or not you've seen it successfully used, not how many studies there are. I have seen these ideas used and used them myself to achieve ast..."

Yes indeed. Empirical evidence rules the roost, but certain "academics" frown on it. Because it doesn't fit their fluffy little ideals.


message 12: by Matt (new) - rated it 3 stars

Matt Young @Don Sevcik, there is a difference between empirical and annacdotal evidence.


message 13: by Adam (new) - rated it 2 stars

Adam Morva Thanks for the links Josiah.


anacostia I applied these tactics to my consulting business and it has taken off.


back to top