Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // Copyright 2019 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. |
| 2 | // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style |
| 3 | // license that can be found in the LICENSE file. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | // Goroutine preemption |
| 6 | // |
| 7 | // A goroutine can be preempted at any safe-point. Currently, there |
| 8 | // are a few categories of safe-points: |
| 9 | // |
| 10 | // 1. A blocked safe-point occurs for the duration that a goroutine is |
| 11 | // descheduled, blocked on synchronization, or in a system call. |
| 12 | // |
| 13 | // 2. Synchronous safe-points occur when a running goroutine checks |
| 14 | // for a preemption request. |
| 15 | // |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 16 | // 3. Asynchronous safe-points occur at any instruction in user code |
| 17 | // where the goroutine can be safely paused and a conservative |
| 18 | // stack and register scan can find stack roots. The runtime can |
| 19 | // stop a goroutine at an async safe-point using a signal. |
| 20 | // |
Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 21 | // At both blocked and synchronous safe-points, a goroutine's CPU |
| 22 | // state is minimal and the garbage collector has complete information |
| 23 | // about its entire stack. This makes it possible to deschedule a |
| 24 | // goroutine with minimal space, and to precisely scan a goroutine's |
| 25 | // stack. |
| 26 | // |
| 27 | // Synchronous safe-points are implemented by overloading the stack |
| 28 | // bound check in function prologues. To preempt a goroutine at the |
| 29 | // next synchronous safe-point, the runtime poisons the goroutine's |
| 30 | // stack bound to a value that will cause the next stack bound check |
| 31 | // to fail and enter the stack growth implementation, which will |
| 32 | // detect that it was actually a preemption and redirect to preemption |
| 33 | // handling. |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 34 | // |
| 35 | // Preemption at asynchronous safe-points is implemented by suspending |
| 36 | // the thread using an OS mechanism (e.g., signals) and inspecting its |
| 37 | // state to determine if the goroutine was at an asynchronous |
| 38 | // safe-point. Since the thread suspension itself is generally |
| 39 | // asynchronous, it also checks if the running goroutine wants to be |
| 40 | // preempted, since this could have changed. If all conditions are |
| 41 | // satisfied, it adjusts the signal context to make it look like the |
| 42 | // signaled thread just called asyncPreempt and resumes the thread. |
| 43 | // asyncPreempt spills all registers and enters the scheduler. |
| 44 | // |
| 45 | // (An alternative would be to preempt in the signal handler itself. |
| 46 | // This would let the OS save and restore the register state and the |
| 47 | // runtime would only need to know how to extract potentially |
| 48 | // pointer-containing registers from the signal context. However, this |
| 49 | // would consume an M for every preempted G, and the scheduler itself |
| 50 | // is not designed to run from a signal handler, as it tends to |
| 51 | // allocate memory and start threads in the preemption path.) |
Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 52 | |
| 53 | package runtime |
| 54 | |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 55 | import ( |
Cherry Mui | fb42fb7 | 2021-05-20 18:55:47 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 56 | "internal/abi" |
Michael Anthony Knyszek | 6d85891 | 2021-06-16 23:05:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 57 | "internal/goarch" |
Michael Anthony Knyszek | 9c58e39 | 2021-06-17 19:10:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 58 | "runtime/internal/atomic" |
Cherry Zhang | 3873e54 | 2019-10-20 17:23:02 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 59 | "unsafe" |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 60 | ) |
| 61 | |
Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 62 | type suspendGState struct { |
| 63 | g *g |
| 64 | |
| 65 | // dead indicates the goroutine was not suspended because it |
| 66 | // is dead. This goroutine could be reused after the dead |
| 67 | // state was observed, so the caller must not assume that it |
| 68 | // remains dead. |
| 69 | dead bool |
| 70 | |
| 71 | // stopped indicates that this suspendG transitioned the G to |
| 72 | // _Gwaiting via g.preemptStop and thus is responsible for |
| 73 | // readying it when done. |
| 74 | stopped bool |
| 75 | } |
| 76 | |
| 77 | // suspendG suspends goroutine gp at a safe-point and returns the |
| 78 | // state of the suspended goroutine. The caller gets read access to |
| 79 | // the goroutine until it calls resumeG. |
| 80 | // |
| 81 | // It is safe for multiple callers to attempt to suspend the same |
| 82 | // goroutine at the same time. The goroutine may execute between |
| 83 | // subsequent successful suspend operations. The current |
| 84 | // implementation grants exclusive access to the goroutine, and hence |
| 85 | // multiple callers will serialize. However, the intent is to grant |
| 86 | // shared read access, so please don't depend on exclusive access. |
| 87 | // |
| 88 | // This must be called from the system stack and the user goroutine on |
| 89 | // the current M (if any) must be in a preemptible state. This |
| 90 | // prevents deadlocks where two goroutines attempt to suspend each |
| 91 | // other and both are in non-preemptible states. There are other ways |
| 92 | // to resolve this deadlock, but this seems simplest. |
| 93 | // |
| 94 | // TODO(austin): What if we instead required this to be called from a |
| 95 | // user goroutine? Then we could deschedule the goroutine while |
| 96 | // waiting instead of blocking the thread. If two goroutines tried to |
| 97 | // suspend each other, one of them would win and the other wouldn't |
| 98 | // complete the suspend until it was resumed. We would have to be |
| 99 | // careful that they couldn't actually queue up suspend for each other |
| 100 | // and then both be suspended. This would also avoid the need for a |
| 101 | // kernel context switch in the synchronous case because we could just |
| 102 | // directly schedule the waiter. The context switch is unavoidable in |
| 103 | // the signal case. |
| 104 | // |
| 105 | //go:systemstack |
| 106 | func suspendG(gp *g) suspendGState { |
| 107 | if mp := getg().m; mp.curg != nil && readgstatus(mp.curg) == _Grunning { |
| 108 | // Since we're on the system stack of this M, the user |
| 109 | // G is stuck at an unsafe point. If another goroutine |
| 110 | // were to try to preempt m.curg, it could deadlock. |
| 111 | throw("suspendG from non-preemptible goroutine") |
| 112 | } |
| 113 | |
| 114 | // See https://golang.org/cl/21503 for justification of the yield delay. |
| 115 | const yieldDelay = 10 * 1000 |
| 116 | var nextYield int64 |
| 117 | |
| 118 | // Drive the goroutine to a preemption point. |
| 119 | stopped := false |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 120 | var asyncM *m |
| 121 | var asyncGen uint32 |
Austin Clements | b89b462 | 2019-10-25 16:17:41 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 122 | var nextPreemptM int64 |
Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 123 | for i := 0; ; i++ { |
| 124 | switch s := readgstatus(gp); s { |
| 125 | default: |
| 126 | if s&_Gscan != 0 { |
| 127 | // Someone else is suspending it. Wait |
| 128 | // for them to finish. |
| 129 | // |
| 130 | // TODO: It would be nicer if we could |
| 131 | // coalesce suspends. |
| 132 | break |
| 133 | } |
| 134 | |
| 135 | dumpgstatus(gp) |
| 136 | throw("invalid g status") |
| 137 | |
| 138 | case _Gdead: |
| 139 | // Nothing to suspend. |
| 140 | // |
| 141 | // preemptStop may need to be cleared, but |
| 142 | // doing that here could race with goroutine |
| 143 | // reuse. Instead, goexit0 clears it. |
| 144 | return suspendGState{dead: true} |
| 145 | |
| 146 | case _Gcopystack: |
| 147 | // The stack is being copied. We need to wait |
| 148 | // until this is done. |
| 149 | |
| 150 | case _Gpreempted: |
| 151 | // We (or someone else) suspended the G. Claim |
| 152 | // ownership of it by transitioning it to |
| 153 | // _Gwaiting. |
| 154 | if !casGFromPreempted(gp, _Gpreempted, _Gwaiting) { |
| 155 | break |
| 156 | } |
| 157 | |
| 158 | // We stopped the G, so we have to ready it later. |
| 159 | stopped = true |
| 160 | |
| 161 | s = _Gwaiting |
| 162 | fallthrough |
| 163 | |
| 164 | case _Grunnable, _Gsyscall, _Gwaiting: |
| 165 | // Claim goroutine by setting scan bit. |
| 166 | // This may race with execution or readying of gp. |
| 167 | // The scan bit keeps it from transition state. |
| 168 | if !castogscanstatus(gp, s, s|_Gscan) { |
| 169 | break |
| 170 | } |
| 171 | |
| 172 | // Clear the preemption request. It's safe to |
| 173 | // reset the stack guard because we hold the |
| 174 | // _Gscan bit and thus own the stack. |
| 175 | gp.preemptStop = false |
| 176 | gp.preempt = false |
| 177 | gp.stackguard0 = gp.stack.lo + _StackGuard |
| 178 | |
| 179 | // The goroutine was already at a safe-point |
| 180 | // and we've now locked that in. |
| 181 | // |
| 182 | // TODO: It would be much better if we didn't |
| 183 | // leave it in _Gscan, but instead gently |
| 184 | // prevented its scheduling until resumption. |
| 185 | // Maybe we only use this to bump a suspended |
| 186 | // count and the scheduler skips suspended |
| 187 | // goroutines? That wouldn't be enough for |
| 188 | // {_Gsyscall,_Gwaiting} -> _Grunning. Maybe |
| 189 | // for all those transitions we need to check |
| 190 | // suspended and deschedule? |
| 191 | return suspendGState{g: gp, stopped: stopped} |
| 192 | |
| 193 | case _Grunning: |
| 194 | // Optimization: if there is already a pending preemption request |
| 195 | // (from the previous loop iteration), don't bother with the atomics. |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 196 | if gp.preemptStop && gp.preempt && gp.stackguard0 == stackPreempt && asyncM == gp.m && atomic.Load(&asyncM.preemptGen) == asyncGen { |
Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 197 | break |
| 198 | } |
| 199 | |
| 200 | // Temporarily block state transitions. |
| 201 | if !castogscanstatus(gp, _Grunning, _Gscanrunning) { |
| 202 | break |
| 203 | } |
| 204 | |
| 205 | // Request synchronous preemption. |
| 206 | gp.preemptStop = true |
| 207 | gp.preempt = true |
| 208 | gp.stackguard0 = stackPreempt |
| 209 | |
Austin Clements | b89b462 | 2019-10-25 16:17:41 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 210 | // Prepare for asynchronous preemption. |
| 211 | asyncM2 := gp.m |
| 212 | asyncGen2 := atomic.Load(&asyncM2.preemptGen) |
| 213 | needAsync := asyncM != asyncM2 || asyncGen != asyncGen2 |
| 214 | asyncM = asyncM2 |
| 215 | asyncGen = asyncGen2 |
Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 216 | |
| 217 | casfrom_Gscanstatus(gp, _Gscanrunning, _Grunning) |
Austin Clements | b89b462 | 2019-10-25 16:17:41 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 218 | |
| 219 | // Send asynchronous preemption. We do this |
| 220 | // after CASing the G back to _Grunning |
| 221 | // because preemptM may be synchronous and we |
| 222 | // don't want to catch the G just spinning on |
| 223 | // its status. |
| 224 | if preemptMSupported && debug.asyncpreemptoff == 0 && needAsync { |
| 225 | // Rate limit preemptM calls. This is |
| 226 | // particularly important on Windows |
| 227 | // where preemptM is actually |
| 228 | // synchronous and the spin loop here |
| 229 | // can lead to live-lock. |
| 230 | now := nanotime() |
| 231 | if now >= nextPreemptM { |
| 232 | nextPreemptM = now + yieldDelay/2 |
| 233 | preemptM(asyncM) |
| 234 | } |
| 235 | } |
Austin Clements | 3f83411 | 2019-09-27 12:27:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 236 | } |
| 237 | |
| 238 | // TODO: Don't busy wait. This loop should really only |
| 239 | // be a simple read/decide/CAS loop that only fails if |
| 240 | // there's an active race. Once the CAS succeeds, we |
| 241 | // should queue up the preemption (which will require |
| 242 | // it to be reliable in the _Grunning case, not |
| 243 | // best-effort) and then sleep until we're notified |
| 244 | // that the goroutine is suspended. |
| 245 | if i == 0 { |
| 246 | nextYield = nanotime() + yieldDelay |
| 247 | } |
| 248 | if nanotime() < nextYield { |
| 249 | procyield(10) |
| 250 | } else { |
| 251 | osyield() |
| 252 | nextYield = nanotime() + yieldDelay/2 |
| 253 | } |
| 254 | } |
| 255 | } |
| 256 | |
| 257 | // resumeG undoes the effects of suspendG, allowing the suspended |
| 258 | // goroutine to continue from its current safe-point. |
| 259 | func resumeG(state suspendGState) { |
| 260 | if state.dead { |
| 261 | // We didn't actually stop anything. |
| 262 | return |
| 263 | } |
| 264 | |
| 265 | gp := state.g |
| 266 | switch s := readgstatus(gp); s { |
| 267 | default: |
| 268 | dumpgstatus(gp) |
| 269 | throw("unexpected g status") |
| 270 | |
| 271 | case _Grunnable | _Gscan, |
| 272 | _Gwaiting | _Gscan, |
| 273 | _Gsyscall | _Gscan: |
| 274 | casfrom_Gscanstatus(gp, s, s&^_Gscan) |
| 275 | } |
| 276 | |
| 277 | if state.stopped { |
| 278 | // We stopped it, so we need to re-schedule it. |
| 279 | ready(gp, 0, true) |
| 280 | } |
| 281 | } |
Austin Clements | d196901 | 2019-10-04 18:54:00 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 282 | |
| 283 | // canPreemptM reports whether mp is in a state that is safe to preempt. |
| 284 | // |
| 285 | // It is nosplit because it has nosplit callers. |
| 286 | // |
| 287 | //go:nosplit |
| 288 | func canPreemptM(mp *m) bool { |
| 289 | return mp.locks == 0 && mp.mallocing == 0 && mp.preemptoff == "" && mp.p.ptr().status == _Prunning |
| 290 | } |
Austin Clements | a3ffb0d | 2019-10-16 19:10:06 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 291 | |
| 292 | //go:generate go run mkpreempt.go |
| 293 | |
| 294 | // asyncPreempt saves all user registers and calls asyncPreempt2. |
| 295 | // |
| 296 | // When stack scanning encounters an asyncPreempt frame, it scans that |
| 297 | // frame and its parent frame conservatively. |
| 298 | // |
| 299 | // asyncPreempt is implemented in assembly. |
| 300 | func asyncPreempt() |
| 301 | |
| 302 | //go:nosplit |
| 303 | func asyncPreempt2() { |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 304 | gp := getg() |
| 305 | gp.asyncSafePoint = true |
Austin Clements | 177a36a | 2019-10-12 21:23:29 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 306 | if gp.preemptStop { |
| 307 | mcall(preemptPark) |
| 308 | } else { |
| 309 | mcall(gopreempt_m) |
| 310 | } |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 311 | gp.asyncSafePoint = false |
| 312 | } |
| 313 | |
| 314 | // asyncPreemptStack is the bytes of stack space required to inject an |
| 315 | // asyncPreempt call. |
| 316 | var asyncPreemptStack = ^uintptr(0) |
| 317 | |
| 318 | func init() { |
Cherry Mui | fb42fb7 | 2021-05-20 18:55:47 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 319 | f := findfunc(abi.FuncPCABI0(asyncPreempt)) |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 320 | total := funcMaxSPDelta(f) |
Cherry Mui | 626e89c | 2021-05-21 13:37:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 321 | f = findfunc(abi.FuncPCABIInternal(asyncPreempt2)) |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 322 | total += funcMaxSPDelta(f) |
| 323 | // Add some overhead for return PCs, etc. |
Michael Anthony Knyszek | 6d85891 | 2021-06-16 23:05:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 324 | asyncPreemptStack = uintptr(total) + 8*goarch.PtrSize |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 325 | if asyncPreemptStack > _StackLimit { |
| 326 | // We need more than the nosplit limit. This isn't |
| 327 | // unsafe, but it may limit asynchronous preemption. |
| 328 | // |
| 329 | // This may be a problem if we start using more |
| 330 | // registers. In that case, we should store registers |
| 331 | // in a context object. If we pre-allocate one per P, |
| 332 | // asyncPreempt can spill just a few registers to the |
| 333 | // stack, then grab its context object and spill into |
| 334 | // it. When it enters the runtime, it would allocate a |
| 335 | // new context for the P. |
| 336 | print("runtime: asyncPreemptStack=", asyncPreemptStack, "\n") |
| 337 | throw("async stack too large") |
| 338 | } |
| 339 | } |
| 340 | |
| 341 | // wantAsyncPreempt returns whether an asynchronous preemption is |
| 342 | // queued for gp. |
| 343 | func wantAsyncPreempt(gp *g) bool { |
Austin Clements | 177a36a | 2019-10-12 21:23:29 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 344 | // Check both the G and the P. |
| 345 | return (gp.preempt || gp.m.p != 0 && gp.m.p.ptr().preempt) && readgstatus(gp)&^_Gscan == _Grunning |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 346 | } |
| 347 | |
| 348 | // isAsyncSafePoint reports whether gp at instruction PC is an |
| 349 | // asynchronous safe point. This indicates that: |
| 350 | // |
| 351 | // 1. It's safe to suspend gp and conservatively scan its stack and |
| 352 | // registers. There are no potentially hidden pointer values and it's |
| 353 | // not in the middle of an atomic sequence like a write barrier. |
| 354 | // |
| 355 | // 2. gp has enough stack space to inject the asyncPreempt call. |
| 356 | // |
| 357 | // 3. It's generally safe to interact with the runtime, even if we're |
| 358 | // in a signal handler stopped here. For example, there are no runtime |
| 359 | // locks held, so acquiring a runtime lock won't self-deadlock. |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 360 | // |
| 361 | // In some cases the PC is safe for asynchronous preemption but it |
| 362 | // also needs to adjust the resumption PC. The new PC is returned in |
| 363 | // the second result. |
| 364 | func isAsyncSafePoint(gp *g, pc, sp, lr uintptr) (bool, uintptr) { |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 365 | mp := gp.m |
| 366 | |
| 367 | // Only user Gs can have safe-points. We check this first |
| 368 | // because it's extremely common that we'll catch mp in the |
| 369 | // scheduler processing this G preemption. |
| 370 | if mp.curg != gp { |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 371 | return false, 0 |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 372 | } |
| 373 | |
| 374 | // Check M state. |
| 375 | if mp.p == 0 || !canPreemptM(mp) { |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 376 | return false, 0 |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 377 | } |
| 378 | |
| 379 | // Check stack space. |
| 380 | if sp < gp.stack.lo || sp-gp.stack.lo < asyncPreemptStack { |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 381 | return false, 0 |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 382 | } |
| 383 | |
| 384 | // Check if PC is an unsafe-point. |
| 385 | f := findfunc(pc) |
| 386 | if !f.valid() { |
| 387 | // Not Go code. |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 388 | return false, 0 |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 389 | } |
Cherry Zhang | a930fed | 2019-10-26 22:54:28 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 390 | if (GOARCH == "mips" || GOARCH == "mipsle" || GOARCH == "mips64" || GOARCH == "mips64le") && lr == pc+8 && funcspdelta(f, pc, nil) == 0 { |
| 391 | // We probably stopped at a half-executed CALL instruction, |
| 392 | // where the LR is updated but the PC has not. If we preempt |
| 393 | // here we'll see a seemingly self-recursive call, which is in |
| 394 | // fact not. |
| 395 | // This is normally ok, as we use the return address saved on |
| 396 | // stack for unwinding, not the LR value. But if this is a |
| 397 | // call to morestack, we haven't created the frame, and we'll |
| 398 | // use the LR for unwinding, which will be bad. |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 399 | return false, 0 |
Cherry Zhang | a930fed | 2019-10-26 22:54:28 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 400 | } |
Cherry Zhang | 8414b1a | 2020-10-21 20:43:16 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 401 | up, startpc := pcdatavalue2(f, _PCDATA_UnsafePoint, pc) |
Cherry Mui | 8ff16c1 | 2021-08-04 19:41:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 402 | if up == _PCDATA_UnsafePointUnsafe { |
Cherry Zhang | 8414b1a | 2020-10-21 20:43:16 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 403 | // Unsafe-point marked by compiler. This includes |
| 404 | // atomic sequences (e.g., write barrier) and nosplit |
| 405 | // functions (except at calls). |
| 406 | return false, 0 |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 407 | } |
Cherry Zhang | 3873e54 | 2019-10-20 17:23:02 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 408 | if fd := funcdata(f, _FUNCDATA_LocalsPointerMaps); fd == nil || fd == unsafe.Pointer(&no_pointers_stackmap) { |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 409 | // This is assembly code. Don't assume it's |
Cherry Zhang | 3873e54 | 2019-10-20 17:23:02 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 410 | // well-formed. We identify assembly code by |
| 411 | // checking that it has either no stack map, or |
| 412 | // no_pointers_stackmap, which is the stack map |
| 413 | // for ones marked as NO_LOCAL_POINTERS. |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 414 | // |
| 415 | // TODO: Are there cases that are safe but don't have a |
| 416 | // locals pointer map, like empty frame functions? |
Russ Cox | 0388670 | 2021-05-06 11:38:46 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 417 | // It might be possible to preempt any assembly functions |
| 418 | // except the ones that have funcFlag_SPWRITE set in f.flag. |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 419 | return false, 0 |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 420 | } |
Cherry Zhang | dcdee15 | 2019-12-18 15:19:05 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 421 | name := funcname(f) |
| 422 | if inldata := funcdata(f, _FUNCDATA_InlTree); inldata != nil { |
| 423 | inltree := (*[1 << 20]inlinedCall)(inldata) |
| 424 | ix := pcdatavalue(f, _PCDATA_InlTreeIndex, pc, nil) |
| 425 | if ix >= 0 { |
| 426 | name = funcnameFromNameoff(f, inltree[ix].func_) |
| 427 | } |
| 428 | } |
| 429 | if hasPrefix(name, "runtime.") || |
| 430 | hasPrefix(name, "runtime/internal/") || |
| 431 | hasPrefix(name, "reflect.") { |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 432 | // For now we never async preempt the runtime or |
| 433 | // anything closely tied to the runtime. Known issues |
| 434 | // include: various points in the scheduler ("don't |
| 435 | // preempt between here and here"), much of the defer |
| 436 | // implementation (untyped info on stack), bulk write |
| 437 | // barriers (write barrier check), |
| 438 | // reflect.{makeFuncStub,methodValueCall}. |
| 439 | // |
| 440 | // TODO(austin): We should improve this, or opt things |
| 441 | // in incrementally. |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 442 | return false, 0 |
Austin Clements | 62e53b7 | 2019-10-08 13:23:51 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 443 | } |
Cherry Zhang | 8414b1a | 2020-10-21 20:43:16 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 444 | switch up { |
| 445 | case _PCDATA_Restart1, _PCDATA_Restart2: |
| 446 | // Restartable instruction sequence. Back off PC to |
| 447 | // the start PC. |
| 448 | if startpc == 0 || startpc > pc || pc-startpc > 20 { |
| 449 | throw("bad restart PC") |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 450 | } |
Cherry Zhang | 8414b1a | 2020-10-21 20:43:16 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 451 | return true, startpc |
| 452 | case _PCDATA_RestartAtEntry: |
| 453 | // Restart from the function entry at resumption. |
Josh Bleecher Snyder | 61a0a70 | 2021-09-21 14:05:57 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 454 | return true, f.entry() |
Cherry Zhang | ee33038 | 2019-11-20 17:10:34 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 455 | } |
| 456 | return true, pc |
Austin Clements | a3ffb0d | 2019-10-16 19:10:06 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 457 | } |
Cherry Zhang | 3873e54 | 2019-10-20 17:23:02 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 458 | |
| 459 | var no_pointers_stackmap uint64 // defined in assembly, for NO_LOCAL_POINTERS macro |