Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(vm): more execute methods #213

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

feat(vm): more execute methods #213

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

sinui0
Copy link
Collaborator

@sinui0 sinui0 commented Jan 31, 2025

This PR adds additional control flow methods to the Execute trait.

@sinui0 sinui0 requested a review from th4s January 31, 2025 19:01
@sinui0 sinui0 merged commit df9cebd into alpha.1 Jan 31, 2025
@sinui0 sinui0 deleted the feat/more-execute-methods branch January 31, 2025 19:02
Copy link
Member

@th4s th4s left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Collaborator

@themighty1 themighty1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, one q for @sinui0

@@ -217,6 +221,18 @@ where
Ok(())
}

fn wants_preprocess(&self) -> bool {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will there be a situation where the first call in the call_stack is not ready for preprocessing?
Otherwise, this fn can just be
!self.call_stack.is_empty()

sinui0 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2025
sinui0 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants