Resource still contains unknown values during apply

[ovadbar]

Terraform Version

12.16? Terraform docker latest as of now

...

### Terraform Configuration Files
resource "google_dns_record_set" "zones" {
  name         = "${var.config["sbc"]["kamailio_tls_domain"]}."
  type         = "A"
  ttl          = 300
  managed_zone = var.dns_zone
  rrdatas      = [module.sbc.0.public_ip]
}

Debug Output

Too much output to paste

Crash Output

Error: configuration for module.iac_gcp.google_dns_record_set.zones still contains unknown values during apply (this is a bug in Terraform; please report it!)

Expected Behavior

Resource. created

Actual Behavior

Error: configuration for module.iac_gcp.google_dns_record_set.zones still contains unknown values during apply (this is a bug in Terraform; please report it!)

Steps to Reproduce

1. terraform init
2. terraform apply

Additional Context

terraform running in a a gitlab pipeline

References

[danieldreier]

Hi! Thanks for reporting this. Based on the error message you're showing I think this is probably a valid issue, and I'd like to reproduce it locally.

To do that, I have to be able to run this and run it on my workstation without inventing any details in order to be confident we're seeing the same behavior. As-is, this is an incomplete reproduction case, and so I'm stuck.

I put the example you provided in https://github.com/danieldreier/terraform-issue-reproductions/blob/master/25117/25117.tf as a starting point. I do have a GCP account I can test from, so if you can make a PR to get this to where I can run it I'd be happy to try and reproduce on my end.

[ovadbar]

Hi Daniel, Thanks for getting back to me. Our terraform is pretty complicated, so I will see if I can reproduce it by narrowing it down to the most basic terraform code. It has worked in the past properly. Thanks Baroukh Ovadia

…

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:08 PM Daniel Dreier ***@***.***> wrote: Hi! Thanks for reporting this. Based on the error message you're showing I think this is probably a valid issue, and I'd like to reproduce it locally. To do that, I have to be able to run this and run it on my workstation without inventing any details in order to be confident we're seeing the same behavior. As-is, this is an incomplete reproduction case, and so I'm stuck. I put the example you provided in https://github.com/danieldreier/terraform-issue-reproductions/blob/master/25117/25117.tf as a starting point. I do have a GCP account I can test from, so if you can make a PR to get this to where I can run it I'd be happy to try and reproduce on my end. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#25117 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALAVUFSGY6PL3BHNC2IDEDRW2SVJANCNFSM4NRZDJGA> .

[danieldreier]

Thank you @ovadbar! I appreciate that. I know that simplifying these sort of issue reproduction cases can be difficult, but it's also the only way we can reproduce it on our end. If you think it's hard to simplify to a good reproduction case on your end, imagine how tough it is on our side without even having the starting point of your codebase! I appreciate your help in reporting it and trying to simplify the reproduction case!

[ovadbar]

Hey Daniel, I think I got it to be as small as possible. Hope this helps. Thanks for being responsive. Baroukh Ovadia

…

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:32 PM Daniel Dreier ***@***.***> wrote: Thank you @ovadbar <https://github.com/ovadbar>! I appreciate that. I know that simplifying these sort of issue reproduction cases can be difficult, but it's also the only way we can reproduce it on our end. If you think it's hard to simplify to a good reproduction case on your end, imagine how tough it is on our side without even having the starting point of your codebase! I appreciate your help in reporting it and trying to simplify the reproduction case! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#25117 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALAVUD5WMHXKO2REGRPNKTRW2VRLANCNFSM4NRZDJGA> .

[ovadbar]

Also I noticed that it validates if I use any index for the outputs as well.

…

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:14 PM Baroukh Ovadia ***@***.***> wrote: Hey Daniel, I think I got it to be as small as possible. Hope this helps. Thanks for being responsive. Baroukh Ovadia On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:32 PM Daniel Dreier ***@***.***> wrote: > Thank you @ovadbar <https://github.com/ovadbar>! I appreciate that. I > know that simplifying these sort of issue reproduction cases can be > difficult, but it's also the only way we can reproduce it on our end. If > you think it's hard to simplify to a good reproduction case on your end, > imagine how tough it is on our side without even having the starting point > of your codebase! I appreciate your help in reporting it and trying to > simplify the reproduction case! > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#25117 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALAVUD5WMHXKO2REGRPNKTRW2VRLANCNFSM4NRZDJGA> > . >

[queglay]

I'm getting this errors if I deploy resources, and then roll them back (like disabling a vpc), but still keeping some null resources