Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Imprecision in date time values #260

Closed
avivace opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Imprecision in date time values #260

avivace opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@avivace
Copy link
Member

avivace commented Dec 20, 2024

If the "most accurate" information we have regarding the release date of an entry is something like "2009" or "August 2009", how do we save it? Should we allow "imprecise" date time values to avoid having to reduce those to 1/1/2009 and 8/2009?

@avivace avivace added the schema label Dec 20, 2024
@dag7dev
Copy link
Contributor

dag7dev commented Dec 24, 2024

I think the safest choice is:

  • every "August 2009" -> 2009-08
  • every unspecified date, let's just assume 01 --> 2009-08-01

Is it accurate? We don't have further data, and rather than unstructured data, we might prefer to have a semi-consistent representation. In case dates become clearer, they can be fixed.

@avivace
Copy link
Member Author

avivace commented Dec 24, 2024

* every "August 2009" -> 2009-08

This is currently not accepted by the schema, hence why I opened this issue

every unspecified date, let's just assume 01 --> 2009-08-01

this "assumption" is actually introducing even more noise/imprecision to the data, it's the same question as writing 2,00 vs 2, they mean different things and imply different precision. a 2009-08-01 would now be indistinguishable from a "real" entry that was released on that day.

avivace added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 24, 2024
@avivace avivace closed this as completed Dec 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants