Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Travis CI and Appveyor configurations #1360

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 17, 2020

Conversation

mdickinson
Copy link
Member

@mdickinson mdickinson commented Nov 17, 2020

We've been using GitHub Actions successfully for a while now, and Travis CI has been increasingly problematic.

This PR removes the Travis CI and Appveyor configurations, leaving only the GitHub actions.


EDIT: This PR also removes the restriction on installing NumPy on Python 3.9. That restriction was only there for the benefit of Travis CI - installing NumPy on the GitHub Actions platform seems to work fine.


EDIT: This PR additionally removes all Python 3.9 restrictions!

@mdickinson
Copy link
Member Author

I've changed the Appveyor configuration (through the Appveyor web page) to "ignore branches without appveyor.yml". Closing and re-opening to make sure I get an all-green CI run.

@mdickinson mdickinson closed this Nov 17, 2020
@mdickinson mdickinson reopened this Nov 17, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@rahulporuri rahulporuri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

setup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rahulporuri rahulporuri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still LGTM

@mdickinson mdickinson merged commit a7dd56d into master Nov 17, 2020
@mdickinson mdickinson deleted the ci/remove-appveyor-and-travis-configs branch November 17, 2020 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants