-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug] Flaky Test RocksDBMessageStoreTest.testMaxOffset #7614
Comments
Didn't find anything wrong in this code dont know why the test is failing |
|
lizhanhui
added a commit
to lizhanhui/rocketmq
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
Signed-off-by: lizhanhui <lizhanhui@gmail.com>
lizhanhui
added a commit
to lizhanhui/rocketmq
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
Signed-off-by: lizhanhui <lizhanhui@gmail.com>
lizhanhui
added a commit
to lizhanhui/rocketmq
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
Signed-off-by: lizhanhui <lizhanhui@gmail.com>
RongtongJin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 11, 2023
* fix #7614 Flaky test RocksDBMessageStoreTest Signed-off-by: lizhanhui <lizhanhui@gmail.com> * fix: give TimerMessageStoreTest#testStateAndRecover more time for Awaitability to poll and check Signed-off-by: lizhanhui <lizhanhui@gmail.com> * clean up exclude test list of bazel Signed-off-by: lizhanhui <lizhanhui@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: lizhanhui <lizhanhui@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Before Creating the Bug Report
I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
Runtime platform environment
CI
RocketMQ version
CI
JDK Version
CI
Describe the Bug
RocksDBMessageStoreTest.testMaxOffset:625 expected:<[3]L> but was:<[1]L>
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/actions/runs/7083756493/job/19276717683
Steps to Reproduce
See CI
What Did You Expect to See?
Test should pass
What Did You See Instead?
Test case failed
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: