Next Article in Journal
Balancing Stability and Recovery: A Scoping Review on Conservative vs. Surgical Management of Acute Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Previous Article in Journal
The Efficacy of Oral Dexamethasone in the Management of Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis Without Pulpotomy: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Overview of Radiological Reporting and Data System (RADS) Guidelines Currently Applicable in Surgery

by
Marco Parillo
1,* and
Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi
1,2
1
Radiology, Multizonal Unit of Rovereto and Arco, APSS Provincia Autonoma Di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
2
Centre for Medical Sciences—CISMed, University of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Surgeries 2025, 6(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6010023
Submission received: 30 January 2025 / Revised: 11 March 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 14 March 2025

Abstract

Standardized frameworks for interpreting medical images, such as the radiological Reporting and Data Systems (RADS), are designed to improve the consistency and accuracy of radiological assessments across different imaging modalities, anatomical locations, and disease processes. Clear communication and information sharing between radiologists and referring physicians, including surgeons, is a key goal of the RADS guidelines. Therefore, familiarity with these guidelines is crucial for all physicians involved in patient care. This review synthesizes current RADS guidelines relevant to surgical practice. Our analysis identified 28 radiological RADS with potential applications in surgical workflows, primarily in oncology. Of the RADS examined, nine were validated by the American College of Radiology (ACR), one was validated through a collaboration between the ACR and other scientific societies, and seventeen were developed by other scientific organizations. Numerous surgical specialties may encounter RADS in clinical practice, including neurosurgery, head and neck surgery, cardiovascular surgery, thoracic surgery, endocrine surgery, breast surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, gynecological surgery, urological surgery, orthopedic surgery, emergency surgery, and surgical oncology. The effective utilization and validation of RADS necessitates close collaboration between radiologists and surgeons, coupled with widespread education for all healthcare professionals involved in patient care. Artificial intelligence software will play an important role in facilitating the dissemination and use of RADS in clinical practice.
Keywords: radiology; surgery; practice guidelines; RADS; magnetic resonance imaging; computed tomography; ultrasound; narrative review radiology; surgery; practice guidelines; RADS; magnetic resonance imaging; computed tomography; ultrasound; narrative review

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parillo, M.; Quattrocchi, C.C. Overview of Radiological Reporting and Data System (RADS) Guidelines Currently Applicable in Surgery. Surgeries 2025, 6, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6010023

AMA Style

Parillo M, Quattrocchi CC. Overview of Radiological Reporting and Data System (RADS) Guidelines Currently Applicable in Surgery. Surgeries. 2025; 6(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parillo, Marco, and Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi. 2025. "Overview of Radiological Reporting and Data System (RADS) Guidelines Currently Applicable in Surgery" Surgeries 6, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6010023

APA Style

Parillo, M., & Quattrocchi, C. C. (2025). Overview of Radiological Reporting and Data System (RADS) Guidelines Currently Applicable in Surgery. Surgeries, 6(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6010023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop