Abstract
The key to the effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) is to fit the uncertainty of each learner’s performance in performing different learning tasks. Throughout the tutoring and learning process, the uncertainty of learners’ performance can reflect their varying knowledge states, which can arise from individual differences in learning characteristics and capacities. In this investigation, we proposed a multidimensional representation of the evolution of knowledge states of learners to better understand individual differences among them. This assumption about this representation is verified using the Tensor Factorization (TF) based method, a modern state-of-the-art model for knowledge tracing. The accuracy of the Tensor-based method is evaluated by comparing it to other knowledge-tracing methods, to gain a deeper insight into individual differences among learners and their learning of diverse contents. The experimental data under focus in our investigation is derived from the AutoTutor lessons that were developed for the Center for the Study of Adult Literacy (CSAL), which employs a trialogue design comprising of a virtual tutor, a virtual companion and a human learner. A broader merit of our proposed approach lies in its capability to capture individual differences more accurately, without requiring any changes in the real-world implementation of ITSs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Granić, A., Adams, R.: User sensitive research in e-learning: exploring the role of individual user characteristics. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(3), 307–318 (2011)
O’Shea, T., et al.: Tools for creating intelligent computer tutors. In: Proceedings of the International NATO Symposium on Artificial and Human Intelligence, pp. 181–199 (1984)
Graesser, A.C., et al.: Assessment with computer agents that engage in conversational dialogues and trialogues with learners. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 607–616 (2017)
Mousavinasab, E., et al.: Intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interact. Learn. Environ. 29(1), 142–163 (2021)
Woolf, B.P.: Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing e-Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2010)
Egan, D.E.: Individual differences in human-computer interaction. In: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 543–568. Elsevier (1988)
Kuurstra, J.: Individual differences in human-computer interaction: a review of empirical studies (2015)
Landriscina, F.: Simulation and Learning. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
MacLellan, C.J.: Computational models of human learning: applications for tutor development, behavior prediction, and theory testing. Ph.D. thesis. Carnegie Mellon University (2017)
Illeris, K: A comprehensive understanding of human learning. In: Contemporary Theories of Learning, pp. 1–14. Routledge (2018)
Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-adapted Interact. 4(4), 253–278 (1994)
Block, J.H., Burns, R.B.: Mastery learning. Review Res. Educ. 4, 3–49 (1976)
Pardos, Z.A., Heffernan, N.T.: Modeling individualization in a Bayesian networks implementation of knowledge tracing. In: De Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 255–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13470-8_24
Trifa, A., Hedhili, A., Chaari, W.L.: Knowledge tracing with an intelligent agent, in an e-learning platform. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24(1), 711–741 (2019)
Pavlik, P.I., Eglington, L.G., Harrell-Williams, L.M.: Logistic knowledge tracing: a constrained framework for learner modeling. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 14(5), 624–639 (2021)
Essa, A.: A possible future for next generation adaptive learning systems. Smart Learn. Environ. 3(1), 1–24 (2016)
Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive hypermedia for education and training. Adapt. Technol. Training Educ. 46, 46–68 (2012)
Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Student modeling and mastery learning in a computer-based programming tutor. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., McCalla, G.I. (eds.) ITS 1992. LNCS, vol. 608, pp. 413–420. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55606-0_49
Abdelrahman, G., Wang, Q., Nunes, B.P.: Knowledge tracing: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 1–37 (2022)
Embretson, S.E., Reise, S.P.: Item Response Theory. Psychology Press (2013)
Barnes, T.: The Q-matrix method: mining student response data for knowledge. In: American Association for Artificial Intelligence 2005 Educational Data Mining Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 1–8. AAAI Press (2005)
Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Comparing two IRT models for conjunctive skills. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 796–798. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_111
Pavlik, P.I., Jr., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance factors analysis–a new alternative to knowledge tracing. Online Submission (2009)
Yudelson, M.V., Koedinger, K.R., Gordon, G.J.: Individualized Bayesian knowledge tracing models. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_18
Käser, T., et al.: Dynamic Bayesian networks for student modeling. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(4), 450–462 (2017)
Lan, A.S., et al.: Sparse factor analysis for learning and content analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.5685 (2013)
Sahebi, S., Lin, Y.-R., Brusilovsky, P.: Tensor factorization for student modeling and performance prediction in unstructured domain. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2016)
Sahebi, S., Huang, Y., Brusilovsky, P.: Parameterized exercises in Java programming: using knowledge structure for performance prediction. In: The Second Workshop on AI-Supported Education for Computer Science (AIEDCS), University of Pittsburgh, pp. 61–70 (2014)
Doan, T.-N., Sahebi, S.: Rank-based tensor factorization for student performance prediction. In: 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM) (2019)
Karatzoglou, A., et al.: Multiverse recommendation: N-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 79–86 (2010)
Graesser, A.C., et al.: Reading comprehension lessons in AutoTutor for the Center for the Study of Adult Literacy. In: Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction, pp. 288–293. Routledge (2016)
Graesser, A.C., Li, H., Forsyth, C.: Learning by communicating in natural language with conversational agents. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23(5), 374–380 (2014)
Fang, Y., Lippert, A., Cai, Z., Hu, X., Graesser, A.C.: A conversation-based intelligent tutoring system benefits adult readers with low literacy skills. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11597, pp. 604–614. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22341-0_47
Graesser, A.C., et al.: Coh-Metrix measures text characteristics at multiple levels of language and discourse. Elementary Sch. J. 115(2), 210–229 (2014)
McNamara, D.S., et al.: Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Newell, A., Simon, H.A., et al.: Human Problem Solving, vol. 104. 9. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)
Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Learning factors analysis–a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_17
Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cogn. Sci. 36(5), 757–798 (2012)
Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: Knowledge component (KC) approaches to learner modeling. Des. Recommendations Intell. Tutoring Syst. 1, 165–182 (2013)
Yudelson, M., Pavlik, P.I., Koedinger, K.R.: User modeling–a notoriously black art. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds.) UMAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6787, pp. 317–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_27
Chi, M., et al.: Instructional factors analysis: a cognitive model for multiple instructional interventions. In: EDM 2011, pp. 61–70 (2011)
Eglington, L.G., Pavlik, P.I., Jr.: How to optimize student learning using student models that adapt rapidly to individual differences. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 1–22 (2022)
Baker, R.S.J., Corbett, A.T., Aleven, V.: More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in Bayesian knowledge tracing. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 406–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44
Baker, R.S.J., Corbett, A.T., Aleven, V.: Improving contextual models of guessing and slipping with a truncated training set (2008)
van De Sande, B.: Properties of the Bayesian knowledge tracing model. J. Educ. Data Min. 5(2), 1–10 (2013)
Wang, D., et al.: Traditional knowledge tracing models for clustered students (2021)
Lan, A.S., Studer, C., Baraniuk, R.G.: Quantized matrix completion for personalized learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5968 (2014)
Lan, A.S., Studer, C., Baraniuk, R.G.: Matrix recovery from quantized and corrupted measurements. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 4973–4977. IEEE (2014)
Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2(1), 183–202 (2009)
Cai, J.-F., Candès, E.J., Shen, Z.: A singular value thresholding algorithm for matrix completion. SIAM J. Optim. 20(4), 1956–1982 (2010)
Shi, G., Pavlik, P., Jr., Graesser, A.: Using an additive factor model and performance factor analysis to assess learning gains in a tutoring system to help adults with reading difficulties. In: Grantee Submission (2017)
Shi, G., et al.: Diagnostic assessment of adults’ reading deficiencies in an intelligent tutoring system. In: ITS Workshops, pp. 105–112 (2018)
Shi, G., et al.: Exploring an intelligent tutoring system as a conversation-based assessment tool for reading comprehension. Behaviormetrika 45(2), 615–633 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-018-0065-9
Wickelgren, W.A.: Human learning and memory. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 32(1), 21–52 (1981)
Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.S.: Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Technical report. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Computer Science (1980)
DeKeyser, R.: Skill acquisition theory. In: Theories in Second Language Acquisition, pp. 83–104. Routledge (2020)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation Learner Data Institute (NSF #1934745).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, L., Pavlik, P.I., Hu, X., Cockroft, J.L., Wang, L., Shi, G. (2023). Exploring the Individual Differences in Multidimensional Evolution of Knowledge States of Learners. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14044. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34735-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34735-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34734-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34735-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)