It was great to have the opportunity to discuss digital engineering (DE) with Nick Freije and Dan Reineke. When I took the position leading Digital Engineering efforts for NAVSEA Warfare Center HQ at the close of CY2022, I noted that the phrase "Digital Engineering" was a colloquialism used by many communities to mean different things. This led to a lot of misdirection and misalignment of priorities as organizations sought to advance "Digital Engineering" without verifying that they were working towards the same goals. Within the same room you may have someone transformation acquisition managmenet, another developing digital infrastructure, and a third working digital execution of tasks. All three individuals would claim they are "driving Digital Engineering" but yet they are working different objectives and potentially towards different ends. Over the last 18 months, I've seen an exponential growth in the attention given to DE. The rise in commercially available generative AI, proliferation in digital manufacturing applications, and advancements in MBSE adoption has bolstered the efforts of those already working in the space and led to former critiques of the "Digital Engineering" label to revisit the subject. Increased community interest, paired with the robust engineering and analytics footprint of our defense RDT&E establishment, has presented us the opportunity to move from "talking digital" to "executing digitally". Representing the warfare centers, I often joke that "I am the Lorax, and I speak for the trees" in reference to my advocacy of engineers, analysts, and developers who are the ones who actually have to implement DE concepts at the working level. DE remains a vast, multi-faceted field but the industry is quickly bringing digital concepts (which were previously academic at best) into the practical realm. We have a golden opportunity to combine our existing system expertise with new and exciting engineering capabilities to do things once considered impractical or impossible. It is going to be exciting to see how we are able to leverage DE to tackle more difficult problems and deliver more sophistocated capability solutions to the Fleet in the coming years.
United States Department of Defense has a lot to do before digital engineering becomes the norm, but some organizations see clear value. Join moderator Jared Serbu, and government and industry leaders as they discuss the benefits of digital-centric engineering vs. document-engineering approaches, best strategies and lessons learned. We get insights from experts at NAVWAR, NAVSEA Warfare Centers (NSWC/NUWC) and Arcfield: Nick Freije, Joseph Pack and Dan Reineke. Watch the on-demand video! | https://bit.ly/3UObKIC Sponsored by Arcfield
President & GM at STC
8moTransformation in engineering isn’t easy however, it’s necessary to keep pace with the complexity of our systems. It was great getting to discuss this and the great work being done across the Navy with you and Nick.