
<<PREVIOUS | FIRST | NEXT PAGE >>
Read it from the beginning on Tapastic or WebToons
Hunger rules the predator and fear drives the prey -- but change is coming.
Oren's Forge updates once a week (sometimes twice) a week on Monday (and sometimes Wednesday).
WANT TO READ AHEAD 20+ PAGES PLUS HELP SUPPORT THE COMIC?
Please consider taking a look at my Patreon!
Having your support will ensure the comic runs without interruption until the conclusion and then on into the next comic project!
Can't join Patreon but would still like to help? Please consider sharing the comic with a friend!
Twitter
When animals considered to be "prey" by the apex predators of the world begin to band together for safety, where does it leave those caught in between?
Namely, a pair of pine martens, carnivores and flesh-eaters themselves, but small enough to be considered food for the bears, wolves and gluttons of the forest and field. They're on a journey to seek sanctuary with the rabbits, squirrels and other prey that have gathered to Oren--but they don't know if welcome or condemnation will meet them.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Unspecified / Any
Gender Any
Size 700 x 1069px
File Size 344.8 kB
Listed in Folders
I had quite the cognitive dissonance there until I realised that "lions" refers to "mountain lions" — hence, of course, the strangeness of pack tactics.
Also, am I the only one getting a restless feeling about the expressions of the pair in the last panel foreground? :)
Also, am I the only one getting a restless feeling about the expressions of the pair in the last panel foreground? :)
Both groups compete…
Both groups evolve, create new tactics and tricks.
Herbivores needed weapons to fend off carnivores.
Carnivores needed ways to get more food, easier, thus traps and tactics.
Over'farming' an area is bad. That is why you either fatten up the food, or ensure enough breeding happens for new population.
Both groups evolve, create new tactics and tricks.
Herbivores needed weapons to fend off carnivores.
Carnivores needed ways to get more food, easier, thus traps and tactics.
Over'farming' an area is bad. That is why you either fatten up the food, or ensure enough breeding happens for new population.
Not yet. Right now we've justified fear. She's seen them do things she couldn't comprehend. Fear is the logical reaction. To justify hate you need anger. Fear is only the first step. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. Hemlock is suffering, but we haven't justified her suffering, yet.
That's very much what I would like to see. I tend to sympathize more with predators, which is hard when pretty much all media makes them out to be evil. While I understand how hard it is to intuitively see a creature that chases down and devours another as worth sympathy, I don't really care for the idea of a fox or a wolf slowly starving to death while the adorable bunnies can eat whatever they find growing outside their burrow.
In a natural environment, carnivores don't really have a choice. They can't just abstain from it when it suits them. They either hunt, or they die. Life is harder for a predator because they have to work harder to get their food. Fight their food. Overpower it and kill their food.
What we see here isn't a natural environment, so I don't doubt we'll see some bizarre alternatives being offered. And I do like how it's been at least hinted that each side in this has positive and negative exemplars. So hopefully some mutual balance will be created. And I personally would like one that doesn't involve all the carnivores becoming vegetarians or insectivores.
In a natural environment, carnivores don't really have a choice. They can't just abstain from it when it suits them. They either hunt, or they die. Life is harder for a predator because they have to work harder to get their food. Fight their food. Overpower it and kill their food.
What we see here isn't a natural environment, so I don't doubt we'll see some bizarre alternatives being offered. And I do like how it's been at least hinted that each side in this has positive and negative exemplars. So hopefully some mutual balance will be created. And I personally would like one that doesn't involve all the carnivores becoming vegetarians or insectivores.
Yes, the first paragraph of your response is pretty much what I was saying in the final one of mine. This isn't a natural environment where rabbits and foxes are driven only by instinct. They can think and reason and come up with alternatives beyond their instincts (if they bother to look for them). Unnecessarily drawing out the suffering of your prey (or outright torturing them) when you have the ability to do otherwise is undeniably cruel, even if you think of your prey as inferior.
The artist plainly intends us to judge these characters by human morals. Whether or not that is a fair standard will depend on how "human" these characters are made to be.
As omnivores, human have the option of surviving (mostly) healthily on non-meat items. If that's an option for the predators in this world, then we can say it would be more moral to prioritize non-meat over sentient-meat. That may not always be practical in this world, but the argument could certainly be made (just like cruelty-free vegetarians have a good claim to moral superiority in our universe).
But it may just be that Mountain Lions in this world can't survive eating berries and insects. The biology of certain predator species may make vegetarianism impractical, uncomfortable, or downright deadly. In which case, it would be a noble species indeed that allowed themselves to collectively starve to death just so they didn't have to take the life of another creature (imagine Jainism on steroids), but I'm not sure I would call that moral.
I doubt the artist will make this a zero-sum contest like that, however. As I think someone else said, what we are likely witnessing is the first attempt at an organized, rationalized society among creatures that, so far, have relied only on their instincts and selfish desires to direct their intellect.
The artist plainly intends us to judge these characters by human morals. Whether or not that is a fair standard will depend on how "human" these characters are made to be.
As omnivores, human have the option of surviving (mostly) healthily on non-meat items. If that's an option for the predators in this world, then we can say it would be more moral to prioritize non-meat over sentient-meat. That may not always be practical in this world, but the argument could certainly be made (just like cruelty-free vegetarians have a good claim to moral superiority in our universe).
But it may just be that Mountain Lions in this world can't survive eating berries and insects. The biology of certain predator species may make vegetarianism impractical, uncomfortable, or downright deadly. In which case, it would be a noble species indeed that allowed themselves to collectively starve to death just so they didn't have to take the life of another creature (imagine Jainism on steroids), but I'm not sure I would call that moral.
I doubt the artist will make this a zero-sum contest like that, however. As I think someone else said, what we are likely witnessing is the first attempt at an organized, rationalized society among creatures that, so far, have relied only on their instincts and selfish desires to direct their intellect.
Comments