Abstract
Analysis of medical datasets has some specific requirements not always fulfilled by standard Machine Learning methods. In particular, heterogeneous and missing data must be tolerated, the results should be easily interpretable. Moreover, with genetic data, often the combination of two or more attributes leads to non-linear effects not detectable for each attribute on its own. We present a new ML algorithm, HCS, taking inspiration from learning classifier systems, decision trees and statistical hypothesis testing. We show the results of applying this algorithm to a well-known benchmark dataset, and to HNSCC, a dataset studying the connection between smoke and genetic patterns to the development of oral cancer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Holland, J.H.: Adaptation. In: Rosen, R., Snell, F.M. (eds.) Progress in theoretical biology 4, Plenum, New York (1976)
Passaro, A., Baronti, F., Maggini, V.: Exploring relationships between genotype and oral cancer development through xcs. In: Rothlauf, F. (ed.) GECCO 2005, Workshop Proceedings, Washington DC, USA, June 25-26, pp. 147–151 (2005)
Itti, L., Baldi, P.: Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS*2005, vol. 19, pp. 1–8. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)
Goldberg, D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)
Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)
Wilson, S.W.: Classifier fitness based on accuracy. Ev. Comp. 3(2) (1995)
Holmes, J.H., Sager, J.A., Bilker, W.B.: Methods for covering missing data in XCS. In: Keijzer, M. (ed.) Late Breaking Papers at GECCO 2004, Seattle, WA (2004)
Butz, M.V., Sastry, K., Goldberg, D.E.: Strong, stable, and reliable fitness pressure in XCS due to tournament selection. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 6(1), 53–77 (2005)
Shaffer, J.P.: Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46, 561–584 (1995)
Perneger, T.V.: What’s wrong with bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal 316, 1236–1238 (1998)
Newman, D.J., Hettich, S., Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J.: UCI repository of machine learning databases (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html
Brier, G.W.: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly weather review 78(1), 1–3 (1950)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baronti, F., Starita, A. (2007). Hypothesis Testing with Classifier Systems for Rule-Based Risk Prediction. In: Marchiori, E., Moore, J.H., Rajapakse, J.C. (eds) Evolutionary Computation,Machine Learning and Data Mining in Bioinformatics. EvoBIO 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4447. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71783-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71783-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71782-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71783-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)