Annals of Forest Science moves to SNAPP, the new manuscript management system developed by Springer.
From January 28, 2025 on, all new manuscripts will be submitted via the Springer Nature Article Processing Platform (SNAPP), instead of the former Editorial Manager platform. You will experience a completely new user-interface that is much more user-friendly than the earlier one.
« Debates » : A new Section on the Annals of Forest Science Website
This new section is devoted to commentaries and debates inspired by results published in the journal. It concentrates on scientific debates and should be seen as a space for discussion about the research results displayed in the journal. Science indeed builds on contradictory debates and complementary viewpoints that may help reach a consensus, or raises new questions that require further research.
The new debate we wish to highlight is raised by claims that the pine wood nematode present in saw-dust could infect wounded pine seedlings independently of the presence of the usual bark beetle vector. However, French colleagues from “Département Santé des Forêts-DSF”, the department in charge of forest health monitoring at national level of France, insist that this risk has been assessed earlier, and that it remains minor with respect to all other risks.
"Rapid Publication" vs. "Scientific Quality" of papers published in Annals of Forest Science: How do we handle this apparent contradiction?
Speed of publication has become a major expectation for authors and therefore a challenge for many journals. Indeed, authors expect timely processing of the manuscripts they submit, to ensure a rapid dissemination of their results. The speed of publication became in the recent years a major criterion for selecting a journal, and some publishers promote (very) fast publication as an argument to select their journal (at the same level than the Impact Factor).