Abstract
The paper’s aims are to present a novel concept of linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set (LIVPFS) or called a linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic type-2 fuzzy set, which is a robust and trustworthy tool, and to accomplish the imprecise information while solving the decision-making problems. The presented LIVPFS is a generalization of the linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy set, by characterizing the membership and non-membership degrees as the interval-valued linguistic terms to represent the uncertain information. To explore the study, we firstly define some basic operational rules, score and accuracy functions, and the ordering relations of LIVPFS with a brief study of the desirable properties. Based on the stated operational laws, we proposed several weighted averages and geometric aggregating operators to aggregate the linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy information. The fundamental inequalities between the proposed operators and their properties are discussed in detail. Finally, a multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) algorithm is promoted to solve the group decision-making problems with uncertain information using linguistic features and the proposed operators. The fundamental inequalities between the proposed operators and their properties are discussed in detail. Also, the illustration of the stated algorithm is given through several numerical examples and compared their performance with the results of the existing algorithms. Based on the stated MAGDM algorithm and the suitable operators, the decision-makers’ can be selected their best alternatives with their own attitude character towards optimism or pessimism choice. The presented LIVPFS is an extension of the several existing sets and is more generalized to utilize the uncertain and imprecise information with a wider range of information. Based on the presented aggregation operators, a decision-maker can select the desired one as per their choices to access the finest alternatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 1965;8:338–53.
Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1986;20(1):87–96.
Atanassov K, Gargov G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1989;31: 343–9.
Atanassov K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, theory and applications. Heidelberg: Physica; 1999.
Garg H, Kumar K. Linguistic interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision-making problems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2019;27(12):2302–11.
Xu ZS. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2007;15:1179–87.
Xu ZS, Yager RR. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 2006;35:417–33.
Garg H. Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making. Comput Ind Eng 2016;101:53–69.
Xu Z, Chen J. On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Fourth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, 2007. FSKD 2007; 2007. p. 466–71.
Garg H. Some robust improved geometric aggregation operators under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making process. J Ind Manag Optim 2018;14(1):283–308.
Yager RR. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. Procedings joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting, Edmonton, Canada; 2013. p. 57–61.
Peng X, Yang Y. Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 2016;31(5):444–87.
Garg H. A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2016;31(1):529–40.
Garg H. Hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Uncertain Quantif 2018;8(3):267–89.
Yager RR, Abbasov AM. Pythagorean membeship grades, complex numbers and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 2013;28:436–52.
Peng X, Yang Y. Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 2015;30(11):1133–60.
Zhang XL, Xu ZS. Extension of TOPSIS to multi-criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 2014;29(12):1061–78.
Garg H. A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision-making processes. Int J Intell Syst 2016;31(12):1234–52.
Garg H. A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 2016;31(9):886–920.
Zeng S, Chen J, Li X. A hybrid method for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 2016;15(2):403–22.
Garg H. Confidence levels based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its application to decision-making process. Comput Math Org Theory 2017;23(4):546–71.
Peng X. New operations for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set. Sci Iran 2019;26(2):1049–76.
Chen T-Y. Multiple criteria decision analysis under complex uncertainty: a pearson-like correlation-based pythagorean fuzzy compromise approach. Int J Intell Syst 2019;34(1):114–51.
Garg H. Neutrality operations-based pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its applications to multiple attribute group decision-making process. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2020;11(7):3021–41.
Peng X, Selvachandran G. Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif Intell Rev 2019;52:1873–927.
Herrera F, Martínez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 2001; 31(2):227–34.
Zhang H. 2014. Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in MAGDM. J Appl Math. Article ID 432092 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/432092.
Chen Z, Liu P, Pei Z. An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. J Comput Intell Syst 2015;8(4):747–60.
Garg H, Kumar K. Group decision making approach based on possibility degree measures and the linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators using Einstein norm operations. J Mult-Valued Logic Soft Comput 2018;31(1/2):175–209.
Garg H. Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in multiattribute decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 2018;33(6):1234–63.
Wang J, Wei G, Gao H. Approaches to multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic pythagorean fuzzy information. Mathematics 2018;6(10):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100201.
Deng X, Wang J, Wei G. Some 2-tuple linguistic pythagorean heronian mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. J Exp Theoret Artif Intell 2019;31(4):555–74.
Rong Y, Pei Z, Liu Y. Linguistic Pythagorean Einstein operators and their application to decision making. Information 2020;11(1):46.
Lin M, Huang C, Xu Z. 2019. Topsis method based on correlation coefficient and entropy measure for linguistic pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Complexity 2019 (Article ID 6967390). Article ID 6967390, pp 16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6967390.
Bustince H, Fernández J, Kolesárová A, Mesiar R. Generation of linear orders for intervals by means of aggregation functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2013;220:69–77.
Miguel DL, Bustince H, Fernández J, Induráin E, Kolesárová A, Mesiar R. Construction of admissible linear orders for interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets with an application to decision making. Inf Fusion 2016;27:189–97.
Miguel DL, Bustince H, Pekala B, Bentkowska U, Da Silva I, Bedregal B, Mesiar R, Ochoa G. Interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic owa aggregations using admissible linear orders and their application to decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2016;24(6):1586–97.
Bustince H, Galar M, Bedregal B, Kolesarova A, Mesiar R. A new approach to interval-valued choquet integrals and the problem of ordering in interval-valued fuzzy set applications. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2013;21(6):1150–62.
Garg H, Kumar K. Some aggregation operators for linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and its application to group decision-making process using the set pair analysis. Arab J Sci Eng 2018;43(6):3213–27.
Kumar K, Garg H. Prioritized linguistic interval-valued aggregation operators and their applications in group decision-making problems. Mathematics 2018;6(10):209. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100209.
Xu ZS. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making under linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 2004;166(1–4):19–30.
Garg H, Kumar K. Group decision making approach based on possibility degree measure under linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. J Ind Manag Optim 2020;16(1):445–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Theorem 5
Proof
Based on the operational laws for LIVPFNs as defined in Theorem 1, we can directly obtain the first part. However, to show Eq. 13 holds, we apply the steps of the principle of mathematical induction (PMI) on n as below:
By Definition 15 for \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}(i=1,2)\), we have
Thus, by Definition 16, we have
Hence, it holds for n = 2.
Consider Eq. 13 true for n = k. Then, for n = k + 1, we get
i.e., Eq. 13 exists for n = k + 1. Hence, by PMI, Eq. 13 is true for all n. □
Proof of the Theorem 10
Proof
We prove only part (1) here. Since \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}= ([s_{a_{i}},s_{b_{i}}],[s_{c_{i}},s_{d_{i}}] )\), (i = 1, 2, … , n) and \({\mathscr{H}}=([s_{a},s_{b}],[s_{c},s_{d}])\) are LIVPFNs, then we have
and
As \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}\) be LIVPFNs, so by its definition, we have ai, bi, ci, di ∈ [0, h] which implies that \({a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2}\), \({b}_{i}^{2}/h^{2}\), \({c_{i}^{2}}/h^{2}\), \({d_{i}^{2}}/h^{2}\) ∈ [0, 1]. So by using Lemma 3, we get
Similarly, we get
On the other hand, for \({c}_{i}^{2}/h^{2},c^{2}/h^{2},{d}_{i}^{2}/h^{2},d^{2}/h^{2}\in [0,1]\) for all i and by using Lemma 3, we have \(1-\left (1-\frac {{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )\left (1-\frac {c^{2}}{h^{2}}\right ) \geq \frac {{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\frac {c^{2}}{h^{2}}\) and \(1-\left (1-\frac {{d}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )\left (1-\frac {d^{2}}{h^{2}}\right ) \geq \frac {{d_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\frac {d^{2}}{h^{2}}\) which gives
and
Therefore, by using Eqs. 25–28 and 9, we get the result. □
Proof of the Theorem 11
Proof
Here, we shall prove only part (1). For any \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}= ([s_{a_{i}},s_{b_{i}}],[s_{c_{i}},s_{d_{i}}])\), (i = 1, 2, … , n) and \({\mathscr{H}}=([s_{a},s_{b}],[s_{c},s_{d}])\), we have
and
Since \(0 \leq \left (1-\tfrac {{a_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right )^{\lambda }\leq 1, 0 \leq \left (1-\frac {a^{2}}{h^{2}}\right ) \leq 1\), \(0\leq \left (\frac {{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )^{\lambda } \leq 1\), \(0 \leq \left (\frac {a^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )\leq 1\), then based on the Lemma 2, we have
Similarly, we can obtain
and
and
Therefore, according to Eqs. 29–32 and by Eq. 9, result (1) holds. □
Proof of the Theorem 13
Proof
For any \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}=([s_{a_{i}}, s_{b_{i}}], [s_{c_{i}}, s_{d_{i}}])\), we have
and
Since 0 ≤ ai, bi, ci, di ≤ h which implies that \({a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2}\leq 1\). Now, by using Lemma 4, we get
Thus, for λ ≥ 1, we have \((1-{a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \leq 1 - ({a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \) and hence
which further implies that
Similarly, we can get
Further, for \({c}_{i}^{2}/h^{2}\leq 1\) and by using Lemma 4, we get \((1-{c}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda } + ({c_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \leq 1\) iff λ ≥ 1 and \((1-{c_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda } + ({c}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \geq 1\) iff 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. Thus, for λ ≥ 1, we have \((1-{c_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda } + ({c}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \leq 1\) which implies that
Similarly, we can get
Hence, by Eq. 9, we get the desired result. □
Proof of the Theorem 4
Proof
For LIVPFN \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}=([s_{a_{i}}, s_{b_{i}}], [s_{c_{i}}, s_{d_{i}}])\), we have
and
Since \(\prod \limits _{i=1}^{n} (1-{a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\omega _{i}}\leq 1\) and hence by Lemma 4, we get
Thus, for λ ≥ 1, we have
Similarly, we can obtain
and
and
Thus, based on these inequalities and by Eq. 9, we get the desired result. □
Proof of the Theorem 15
Proof
To prove (1) for any LIVPFN \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}=([s_{a_{i}}, s_{b_{i}}],[s_{c_{i}},\) \( s_{d_{i}}])\), we have
and
We first prove \(\text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1}\otimes {\mathscr{H}}, \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2}\otimes {\mathscr{H}}, \ldots , \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n}\otimes {\mathscr{H}}) \leq \text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1}, \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2},\ldots , \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n})\).
As \(A^{2}/h^{2}, 1-{a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2} \in [0,1]\) and hence \((A^{2}/h^{2})\left (1-(1-{a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \right ) \leq 1-(1-{a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \) which implies that \(1-A^{2}/h^{2}\left (1-(1-{a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda }\right ) \geq (1-{a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda }\) and thus
Similarly, we can obtain
According to Eq. 9, we have \(\text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1}\otimes {\mathscr{H}}, \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2}\otimes {\mathscr{H}}, \ldots , \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n}\otimes {\mathscr{H}})\) ≤ \(\text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1}\), \(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2}\), …, \(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n})\).
Later, we prove \(\text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1}, \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2},\ldots , \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n}) \leq \text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1}\oplus {\mathscr{H}}, \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2}\oplus {\mathscr{H}}, \ldots , \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n}\oplus {\mathscr{H}}) \).
For \(A^{2}/h^{2}, {a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2}\leq 1\), we have \((A^{2}/h^{2})(1-{a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda } \leq (1-{a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda }\) which implies that \(1-\prod \limits _{i=1}^{n}\left ((A^{2}/h^{2})(1-{a}_{i}^{2}/h^{2})^{\lambda }\right )^{\omega _{i}} \geq 1-\prod \limits _{i=1}^{n} \left ((1-{a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2})^{\lambda }\right )^{\omega _{i}}\) and hence, we get
Similarly, we have
Now, for \({c_{i}^{2}}/h^{2}, C^{2}/h^{2}\leq 1\), we can derive that
Hence, by Eq. 9, we get \(\text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1},\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2},\ldots ,\) \( \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n}) \leq \text {LIVPFWA}(\lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{1}\oplus {\mathscr{H}}, \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{2}\oplus {\mathscr{H}}, \ldots , \lambda {\mathscr{H}}_{n}\oplus {\mathscr{H}}) \).
Based on these two steps, we get the desired result. □
Proof of Theorem 16
Proof
We shall prove the parts (1) and (5), while others can be proved analogously.
-
1)
For two LIVPFNs \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}=([s_{a_{i}}, s_{b_{i}}], [s_{c_{i}}, s_{d_{i}}])\) and \(\xi _{i}=([s_{A_{i}}, s_{B_{i}}], [s_{C_{i}}, s_{D_{i}}])\), we have
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && \text{LIVPFWA}(\mathcal{H}_{1}\oplus\xi_{1},\mathcal{H}_{2}\oplus\xi_{2},\ldots,\mathcal{H}_{n}\oplus\xi_{n}) \\ & =& \left( \left[ \begin{array}{c} s_{h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( 1-\frac{{a_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{A_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}}}, \\ s_{h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( 1-\frac{{b_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{B_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}}} \end{array} \right],\right.\\&&\left. \left[ \begin{array}{c} s_{h\left( \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \frac{c_{i}}{h}\right)\left( \frac{C_{i}}{h}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}}, \\ s_{h\left( \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \frac{d_{i}}{h}\right)\left( \frac{D_{i}}{h}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}} \end{array} \right] \right) \end{array} $$and
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && \text{LIVPFWA}(\mathcal{H}_{1}\otimes\xi_{1},\mathcal{H}_{2}\otimes\xi_{2},\ldots,\mathcal{H}_{n}\otimes\xi_{n}) \\ & =& \left( \left[ \begin{array}{c} s_{h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\left( \frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}}}, \\ s_{h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\left( \frac{{b}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{B}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}}} \end{array} \right],\right.\\ &&\left. \left[ \begin{array}{c} s_{h\left( \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\sqrt{1-\left( 1-\frac{{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{C}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)}\right)^{\omega_{i}}}, \\ s_{h\left( \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\sqrt{1-\left( 1-\frac{{d}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{D}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)}\right)^{\omega_{i}}} \end{array} \right] \right) \end{array} $$For \({a_{i}^{2}}/h^{2}, A^{2}/h^{2}\leq 1\) and hence by Lemma 2, we get \(1-\left (1-\frac {{a_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right )\left (1-\frac {{A_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right ) \geq \left (\frac {{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )\left (\frac {{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )\) which implies that
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && \left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \leq 1-\left( \frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \\ &\Rightarrow & \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}\\ &&\quad \leq \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\left( \frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}} \\ &\Rightarrow & h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}}\\ && \geq h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\left( \frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}} \end{array} $$Similarly, we have
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} &&h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( 1-\frac{{b}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{B}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}}\\ && \quad\geq h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\left( \frac{{b}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{B}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}} \end{array} $$Now, for non-membership components, we have \({c_{i}^{2}}/h^{2}, C^{2}/h^{2}\leq 1\) and again by Lemma 2, we get
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && 1-\left( 1-\frac{{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{C}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \geq \left( \frac{{c_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{C_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right) \\ &\Rightarrow & \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\left( 1-\frac{{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{C}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}\\ && \geq \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( \frac{{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( \frac{{C}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}} \end{array} $$$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} &\Rightarrow & h\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \sqrt{\left( 1-\left( 1-\frac{{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{C}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}} \\ &&\geq h\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( \frac{c_{i}}{h}\right)\left( \frac{C_{i}}{h}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}} \end{array} $$Similarly, we get
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} &&h\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \sqrt{\left( 1-\left( 1-\frac{{d}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\left( 1-\frac{{D}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}}} \\ &&\geq h\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \left( \frac{d_{i}}{h}\right)\left( \frac{D_{i}}{h}\right) \right)^{\omega_{i}} \end{array} $$Hence, by Eq. 9, we get desired result.
-
5)
For any two LIVPFNs \({\mathscr{H}}_{i}=([s_{a_{i}}, s_{b_{i}}], [s_{c_{i}}, s_{d_{i}}])\) and \(\xi _{i}=([s_{A_{i}}, s_{B_{i}}], [s_{C_{i}}, s_{D_{i}}])\), we have
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && \text{LIVPFWA}(\mathcal{H}_{1},\mathcal{H}_{2},\ldots,\mathcal{H}_{n}) \otimes \text{LIVPFWA}(\xi_{1},\xi_{2},\ldots,\xi_{n}) \\ & =& \left( \left[ \begin{array}{c} s_{h\sqrt{ \left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) \left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) } }, \\ s_{h\sqrt{ \left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{b}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) \left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{B}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) } } \end{array} \right],\right.\\ &&\left.\left[ \begin{array}{c} s_{h\sqrt{ 1-\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{C}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) } }, \\ s_{h\sqrt{ 1-\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{d}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{D}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) } } \end{array} \right] \right) \end{array} $$As \(\prod \limits _{i=1}^{n}\left (1-\frac {{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )^{\omega _{i}}, \prod \limits _{i=1}^{n}\left (1-\frac {{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right )^{\omega _{i}} \leq 1\) and thus by Lemma 2, we have
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && 1- \left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}} \right) \\ && \qquad \geq \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}} \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}} \\ &\Rightarrow & 1- \left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\frac{{A_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}} \right) \\ && \qquad \geq \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\cdot \left( 1-\frac{{A_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}} \\&\Rightarrow & \left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{a_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}} \right) \\ && \qquad \leq 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\cdot \left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}} \end{array} $$$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} &\Rightarrow & h\sqrt{\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}} \right)} \\ && \qquad \leq h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \left( 1-\frac{{a}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\cdot \left( 1-\frac{{A}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}} \end{array} $$Similarly, we have
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && h\sqrt{\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( 1-\frac{{b}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( 1-\frac{{B_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}} \right)} \\ && \qquad \leq h\sqrt{1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \left( 1-\frac{{b_{i}^{2}}}{h^{2}}\right)\cdot \left( 1-\frac{{B}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}}} \end{array} $$$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} && h\sqrt{1-\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{c}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{C}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) } \\ && \qquad \geq h\left( \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \frac{c_{i}}{h}\right)\left( \frac{C_{i}}{h}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}} \\ &\text{and ~~ } & h\sqrt{1-\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{d}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right)\left( 1-\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} \left( \frac{{D}_{i}^{2}}{h^{2}}\right)^{\omega_{i}}\right) } \\ && \qquad \qquad \qquad \geq h\left( \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left( \frac{d_{i}}{h}\right)\left( \frac{D_{i}}{h}\right)\right)^{\omega_{i}} \end{array} $$Hence, based on these inequalities and by Eq. 9, the part (5) is proved.
□
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garg, H. Linguistic Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision-making Process. Cogn Comput 12, 1313–1337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09750-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09750-4