Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Neurosciences in Brazil: a bibliometric study of main characteristics, collaboration and citations

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brazilian scientific output in the field of Neurosciences is analyzed based on articles indexed in Web of Science from 2006 to 2013 according to bibliometric indicators of production, collaboration, impact and keywords analysis. The growth rate of Brazilian scientific output is greater than global scientific production in the area, with a higher percentage of articles in English than other research areas in Brazil and Brazilian neuroscientists preferring to publish their work in foreign journals. However, Portuguese papers were also observed in domestic journals in connection mainly to one research focus—Psychiatry. Modes of production in the area are also transdisciplinary when analyzed within the scope of research topics, which branch into issues related to basic and experimental research as well as clinical research. In addition, the Brazilian Neurosciences output is highly concentrated to a small number of authors, regions, and particularly institutions, with most output coming from public universities in the southeastern and southern states. However, there is greater participation by the private sector than in other fields of knowledge (mainly private universities and hospitals). Interinstitutional collaboration occurs in 60.79 % and international collaboration in 29.40 %. Brazil’s main partners in international collaboration are the USA, Colombia, Argentina and the UK. With regard to citations, journals that most cite Brazilian Neurosciences are US, English and English-language Dutch publications, but the citing authors are linked to institutions on all continents of the world. It concludes that global reach and accelerated productivity growth does not translate into excellent impact. Thus, it is suggested to conduct further studies to determine why research is scarce in the northern and northeastern states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. The names of these institutions do not appear in the screen cap of the map because they are too close to other institutions, but they can be identified when directly viewed using the software by placing the mouse over the circles.

References

  • Almeida, E. C. E., & Guimarães, J. A. (2013). Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles—How are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators? Scientometrics, 97(2), 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. (n.d.). Sobre nós. São Paulo: Associação Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.br/revistas/anp/paboutj.htm.

  • Ashrafi, F., Mohammadhassanzadeh, H., Shokraneh, F., Valinejadi, A., Johari, K., Saemi, N., et al. (2012). Iranian’s contribution to world literature on neuroscience. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 29, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacheschi, L. A., & Guerreiro, C. A. M. (2004). Situação das neurociências no Brasil: Neurociências clínicas. Ciência e Cultura, 56(1), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2004). Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: UNESP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casani, F., Filippo, D., García-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2014). Public versus private universities: Assessment of research performance; case study of the Spanish university system. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorta-Contreras, A. J., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Martí-Lahera, Y., & Araujo-Ruiz, J. A. (2008). Productividad y visibilildad de lós neurocientíficos cubanos. Revista de Neurología, 47(7), 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. (n.d.). Dicionário Histórico-Biográfico das Ciências da Saúde no Brasil (1832–1930). Retrieved from: http://www.dichistoriasaude.coc.fiocruz.br/iah/pt/index.php.

  • Garfield, E. (1990). KeyWords Plus: ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. Part I. Expanding your searching power on Current Contents on Diskette. Current Contents, 32, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., & Sher, I. (1993). KeyWords Plus: Algorithmic derivative indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(5), 298–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.5311&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Glänzel, W., Dannel, R., & Persson, O. (2003). The decline of Swedish neuroscience: Decomposing a bibliometric national science indicator. Scientometrics, 57(2), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Leta, J., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67(1), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, S., Cótê, G., & Beaudet, A. (2013). State of knowledge production in Neuroscience in Alberta: A bibliometric assessment. Montréal: Science-Metrix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2014c). Tabela de códigos de áreas. Retrieved from: http://concla.ibge.gov.br/classificacoes/por-tema/codigo-de-areas/codigo-de-areas.

  • Journal Citation Reports. (2015c). 2014 JCR Science Edition. New York: Thomson Reuters.

  • Leta, J. (2012). Brazilian growth in the mainstream science: The role of human resources and national journals. Journal of Scientometric Research, 1(1), 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., & Chaimovich, H. (2002). Recognition and international collaboration: The Brazilian case. Scientometrics, 53(3), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., & Cruz, C. H. B. (2003). A produção científica brasileira. In E. B. Viotti & M. M. Macedo (Eds.), Indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil (pp. 123–168). Campinas: Unicamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectorial and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2013). A macro-level study of science in Brazil: Seven years later. Encontros Bibli, 18(36), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Library of Congress. (2000). The decade of the brain. Washington: LOC. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/.

  • Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, A. J. (1999). A comunicação científica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meneghini, R. (1996). The key role of collaborative work in the growth of Brazilian science in the last ten years. Scientometrics, 35(3), 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myskiw, J., & Yano, C. (2012). Memórias de um brasileiro de Buenos Aires. Ciência Hoje, 50(297), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria. (2014). Instructions to authors. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.br/revistas/rbp/iinstruc.htm.

  • Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica. (2014). Announcements. São Paulo: USP. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.br/revistas/rbp/iinstruc.htm.

  • Rousseau, R. (1998). Indicadores bibliométricos e econométricos para a avaliação de instituições científicas. Ciência da Informação, 27(2), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabudin, S. M. (2013). Mapping neuroscience research in India: A bibliometric approach. Current Science, 104(12), 1619–1626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timo-Iaria, C. (n.d.). História da neurofisiologia no Brasil. Retrieved from: http://www.sbnec.org.br/site/texto.php?id_texto=3.

  • United Nations. (2013). Countries or areas, codes and abbreviations. Genova: United Nations. Retrieved from: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49alpha.htm.

  • Vanz, S. A. S., & Caregnato, S. E. (2003). Estudos de citação: uma ferramenta para entender a comunicação científica. Em Questão, 9(2), 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, D. F. (2004). Situação das neurociências no Brasil: disciplinas básicas. Ciência e Cultura, 56(1), 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, D. F. (2010). Um retrato da área de Neurociência e Comportamento no Brasil. Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa, 26, 123–129.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). The world health report. Mental health, new understanding, new hope. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/.

  • Xu, W., Chen, Y., & Shen, Z. (2003). Neuroscience output of China: A medline-based bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 57(3), 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for funding the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (Brazil), Av. Ramiro Barcelos, n. 2705, sala 214, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035007, Brazil

    Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen & Samile Andréa de Souza Vanz

Authors
  1. Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samile Andréa de Souza Vanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoppen, N.H.F., Vanz, S.A.d. Neurosciences in Brazil: a bibliometric study of main characteristics, collaboration and citations. Scientometrics 109, 121–141 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1919-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1919-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification