Skip to main content

Approaches to Analyzing the Vulnerability of Community Water Systems to Groundwater Contamination in Los Angeles County

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research in Mathematics and Public Policy

Part of the book series: Association for Women in Mathematics Series ((AWMS,volume 23))

  • 425 Accesses

Abstract

Groundwater resources are increasingly drawn on as means to buffer surface water shortages during droughts as well as to improve the Los Angeles region’s reliance on local, rather than imported, water sources. However, the Los Angeles region is home to a legacy of contamination that threatens the quality and safety of groundwater as a drinking water resource. As utilities and other water management entities in the Los Angeles region look to increase their reliance on groundwater resources, a comprehensive understanding of which community water systems may be vulnerable to contamination can help planners, policy makers and regulators support these communities. This paper details the objectives, process and lessons learned from a workshop-based research project that examined the spatial extent of groundwater contamination in Los Angeles County’s groundwater basins. Our team of researchers cleaned and processed multiple geospatial datasets and utilized logistic regression and machine learning methods to predict which community drinking water systems are particularly vulnerable to groundwater contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Compliance data from 2017 was not available at the time of analysis, and data from 2012 and earlier was not available in tabular format.

References

  1. Chappelle, C., Hanak, E., & Harter, T.: Groundwater in California. https://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/JTF_GroundwaterJTF.pdf (2018). Accessed 30 January 2019

  2. Diffenbaugh, N. S., Swain, D. L., Touma, D.: Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(13), 3931-3936 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422385112

  3. Helperin, A., Beckman, D. & Inwood, D.: California’s Contaminated Groundwater: Is the State Minding the Store? Natural Resources Defense Council. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/ccg.pdf (2001). Accessed 30 January 2019

  4. Ponti, D. J., Wagner, B. J., Land, M., Landon, M. K.: Characterization of potential transport pathways and implications for groundwater management near an anticline in the Central Basin area, Los Angeles County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1087 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141087

  5. State Water Resources Control Board: Communities that Rely on a Contaminated Groundwater Source for Drinking Water. Report to the Legislature. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/ab2222/docs/ab2222.pdf (2013). Accessed 30 January 2019

  6. DeShazo, J.R., Pierce, G., McCann, H.: Los Angeles Community Water Systems: Atlas and Policy Guide. UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. https://innovation.luskin.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/Water_Atlas_0.pdf (2015). Accessed 30 January 2019

  7. Sacramento State: Assessing Groundwater Contamination Risks in California’s Disadvantaged Communities. Sacramento State Office of Water Programs. http://www.owp.csus.edu/grid/ (2018). Accessed 30 January 2019

  8. United States Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Laws and Regulations. https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-safe-drinking-water-act (2019). Accessed 30 January 2019

  9. State Water Resources Control Board: Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. Division of Water Quality. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/gama/online_tools.html (2019b). Accessed 30 January 2019

  10. State Water Resources Control Board: GeoTracker. http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/datadownload (2019a). Accessed 30 January 2019

  11. Los Angeles Water Hub: University of California Center for Sustainable Communities. http://waterhub.ucla.edu/ (2019). Accessed 30 January 2019

  12. California Department of Drinking Water: Annual Compliance Report. State Water Resources Control Board. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/Publications.html#compliance (2019). Accessed 30 January 2019

  13. California Department of Drinking Water: California Community Water Systems Inventory Dataset. State Water Resources Control Board. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/california-community-water-systems-inventory-dataset-2010 (2010). Accessed 30 January 2019.

  14. Choubin, B., Solaimani, K., Habibnejad Roshan, M., Malekian, A.: Watershed classification by remote sensing indices: A fuzzy c-means clustering approach. Journal of Mountain Science, 14(10), 2053–2063 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4357-4

  15. Choubin, B., Darabi, H., Rahmati, O., Sajedi-Hosseini, F., Kløve, B.: River suspended sediment modelling using the CART model: A comparative study of machine learning techniques. Science of The Total Environment, 615, 272–281 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.293

  16. Khalil, A., Almasri, M. N., McKee, M., Kaluarachchi, J. J.: Applicability of statistical learning algorithms in groundwater quality modeling. Water Resources Research, 41(5) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003608

  17. Rodríguez-Lado, L., Sun, G., Berg, M., Zhang, Q., Xue, H., Zheng, Q., Johnson, C. A.: Groundwater Arsenic Contamination Throughout China. Science, 341(6148), 866–868 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237484

  18. Sajedi-Hosseini, F., Malekian, A., Choubin, B., Rahmati, O., Cipullo, S., Coulon, F., Pradhan, B.: A novel machine learning-based approach for the risk assessment of nitrate groundwater contamination. Science of The Total Environment, 644, 954–962 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.054

  19. Singh, K. P., Gupta, S., Mohan, D.: Evaluating influences of seasonal variations and anthropogenic activities on alluvial groundwater hydrochemistry using ensemble learning approaches. Journal of Hydrology, 511, 254–266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.004

  20. Bretzler, A., Lalanne, F., Nikiema, J., Podgorski, J., Pfenninger, N., Berg, M., Schirmer, M.: Groundwater arsenic contamination in Burkina Faso, West Africa: Predicting and verifying regions at risk. Science of The Total Environment, 584–585, 958–970 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.147

  21. Cao, H., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Pi, K., Li, J., Zhan, H., Liu, P.: Predicting the risk of groundwater arsenic contamination in drinking water wells. Journal of Hydrology, 560, 318–325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.007

  22. Li, Y., Wang, D., Liu, Y., Zheng, Q., Sun, G.: A predictive risk model of groundwater arsenic contamination in China applied to the Huai River Basin, with a focus on the region’s cluster of elevated cancer mortalities. Applied Geochemistry, 77, 178–183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.05.003

  23. Mfumu Kihumba, A., Ndembo Longo, J., Vanclooster, M.: Modelling nitrate pollution pressure using a multivariate statistical approach: the case of Kinshasa groundwater body, Democratic Republic of Congo. Hydrogeology Journal, 24(2), 425–437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1337-z

  24. Garson, G. D.: Interpreting neural-network connection weights. AI expert, 6(4), 46-51. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle E. Miro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s) and the Association for Women in Mathematics

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miro, M.E., Best, K., Kaynar, N., Kirpes, R., Najera Chesler, A. (2020). Approaches to Analyzing the Vulnerability of Community Water Systems to Groundwater Contamination in Los Angeles County. In: Lee, M., Najera Chesler, A. (eds) Research in Mathematics and Public Policy. Association for Women in Mathematics Series, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58748-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics