Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with stress constraints

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we propose to extend the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method for compliance minimization design subject to both constraints on volume fraction and maximum von Mises stress. To this end, the aggregated p-norm global stress measure is first adopted to approximate the maximum stress. The conventional compliance design objective is augmented with p-norm stress measures by introducing one or multiple Lagrange multipliers. The Lagrange multipliers are employed to yield compromised designs of the compliance and the p-norm stress. An empirical scheme is developed for the determination of the Lagrange multipliers such that the maximum von Mises stress could be effectively constrained through the controlling of the aggregated p-norm stress. To further enforce the satisfaction of stress constraints, the stress norm parameter p is assigned to a higher value after attaining the objective volume. The update of the binary design variables lies in the computationally efficient sensitivity numbers derived using the adjoint method. A series of comparison studies has been conducted to validate the effectiveness of the method on several benchmark design problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allaire G, Jouve F (2008) Minimum stress optimal design with the level set method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 32:909–918

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cai S, Zhang W, Zhu J, Gao T (2014) Stress constrained shape and topology optimization with fixed mesh: a b-spline finite cell method combined with level set function. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 278:361–387

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GD, Guo X (1997) ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 13:258–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GD, Jiang Z (1992) Study on topology optimization with stress constraints. Eng Optim 20:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da D, Yvonnet J, Xia L, Li G (2018) Topology optimization of particle-matrix composites for optimal fracture resistance taking into account interfacial damage. Int J Numer Methods Eng 115(5):604–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton JD, Grandhi RV (2014) A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(1):1–38

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duysinx P (1999) Topology optimization with different stress limits in tension and compression. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization WCSMO3

  • Duysinx P, Bendsøe M (1998) Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress constraints. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43:1453–1478

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duysinx P, Sigmund O (1998) New development in handling stress constraints in optimal material distribution. In: Proc. 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. A collection of technical papers (held in St. Louis, Missouri), 3:1501–1509

  • Guo X, Zhang W, Wang M, Wei P (2011) Stress-related topology optimization via level set approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(47–48):3439–3452

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong W (2014) Stress-related topology optimization of continuum structures involving multi-phase materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 268:632–655

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Xie YM (2007) Convergent and mesh-independent solutions for bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method. Finite Elem Anal Des 43:1039–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Xie YM (2010) Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with an additional displacement constraint. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40:409–416

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U (1990) On singular topologies in optimum structural design. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le C, Norato J, Bruns T, Ha C, Tortorelli D (2010) Stress-based topology optimization for continua. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41:605–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Shi T, Xia Q (2017) Eliminate localized eigenmodes in level set based topology optimization for the maximization of the first eigenfrequency of vibration. Adv Eng Softw 107:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Wang MY, Kang Z (2013) An enhanced aggregation method for topology optimization with local stress constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:31–41

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Picelli R, Townsend S, Brampton C, Norato J, Kim H (2018) Stress-based shape and topology optimization with the level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 329:1–23

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany G (2001) On design-dependent constraints and singular topologies. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany G, Birker T (1994) On singular topologies in exact layout optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 8:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany G, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1992) New optimality criteria methods: forcing uniqueness of the adjoint strains by corner rounding at constraint intersections. Struct Multidiscip Optim 4:244–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Miegroet LV, Duysinx P (2007) Stress concentration minimization of 2D filets using X-fem and level set description. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(4):425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei P, Wang MY (2009) Piecewise constant level set method for structural topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78(4):379–402

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Q, Shi T, Liu S, Wang MY (2012) A level set solution to the stress-based structural shape and topology optimization. Comput Struct 90-91:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Q, Shi T, Liu S, Wang MY (2013) Shape and topology optimization for tailoring stress in a local region to enhance performance of piezoresistive sensors. Comput Struct 114:98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Da D, Yvonnet J (2018a) Topology optimization for maximizing the fracture resistance of quasi-brittle composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 15(332):234–254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Xia Q, Huang X, Xie Y (2018b) Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: a comprehensive review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25(2):437–478

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Zhang L, Xia Q, Shi T (2018c) Stress-based topology optimization using bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 333:356–370

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Chen C (1996) Stress-based topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 12:98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Guo X, Wang MY, Wei P (2013) Optimal topology design of continuum structures with stress concentration alleviation via level set method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(9):942–959

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Yuan J, Zhang J, Guo X (2016) A new topology optimization approach based on Moving Morphable Components (MMC) and the ersatz material model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(6):1243–1260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Chen J, Zhu X, Zhou J, Xue D, Lei X, Guo X (2017) Explicit three dimensional topology optimization via Moving Morphable Void (MMV) approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 322:590–614

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Li D, Zhou J, Du Z, Li B, Guo X (2018) A Moving Morphable Void (MMV)-based explicit approach for topology optimization considering stress constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 334:381–413

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Sigmund O (2017) On fully stressed design and p-norm measures in structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(3):731–736

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Zhang W, Xia L (2016) Topology optimization in aircraft and aerospace structures design. Arch Comput Methods Eng 23(4):595–622

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo ZH, Xie YM, Huang X (2012) Evolutionary topology optimization of structures with multiple displacement and frequency constraints. Adv Struct Eng 15(2):359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705165, 51405170, 51790171, 5171101743) and the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei province of China (2017CFA044).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Xia.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Qing Li

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, Z., Xia, L., Lai, W. et al. Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with stress constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim 59, 647–658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2090-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2090-4

Keywords