Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Blog posts uploaded as daily logs in supervisor dashboard for team_id 338 #853

Closed
linberg opened this issue Sep 12, 2017 · 12 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@linberg
Copy link

linberg commented Sep 12, 2017

In the supervisor dashboard (id: 1306) for team_id 338, blog posts from other teams have been uploaded as daily logs on 7 occasions (11.08., 15.08., 04.09., 06.09., 08.09., 09.09. and 11.09.) always at 02:00 CEST. Please see screenshot.
screen shot 2017-09-12 at 17 31 27

EDIT (Maud) In the screenshot, only the posts with the photo avatar are really by team id 338, the other posts are feed entries from other teams.

@emcoding
Copy link
Member

Thanks for reporting this @linberg. I'll look into it.

@emcoding emcoding self-assigned this Sep 12, 2017
@klappradla klappradla added the bug label Sep 12, 2017
@emcoding
Copy link
Member

The supervisor dashboard redirects to the activity page to show the status updates of the team.
The problem occurs with the activity page.

It looks like there are two problems here.

  1. The feed entries are trying to load pictures on AWS S3 and don't get access.
    feed entry aws

  2. Team id 338 is the only team where the activities try to get access to other teams' feed entries 🤔
    activities team 338

I did not figure out yet what the source of the problem(s) are. Tips that gives me a direction are welcome!
( @carpodaster , @klappradla )

@emcoding
Copy link
Member

@linberg Do you recall if this problem existed before last week? Or did the post from Sept 8 and Sept 9 appear at once this week?

@linberg
Copy link
Author

linberg commented Sep 14, 2017

First time this issue occurred was with the first blog post, so August 11th. There was another bug with this team as well during the application process, their application had showed up under their last year's team name (as they had also applied then). Also at the beginning of the program their daily logs were also going under their last year's team name, I unfortunately don't know the ID, but I think @mkalininait had looked into that issue.

@klappradla
Copy link
Member

I don't have time to look into this right now @F3PiX, but the S3 issue may have something to do with me updating the gem...? It's the only touchpoint recent commits had with S3 as far as I remember.
I can just revert the commit and see if we're back at normal with this.

@emcoding
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @klappradla, I thought of that but Linda reports that it occurred long before the gem update. Let me look into it to see if I find something else first. Thanks a lot!

@klappradla
Copy link
Member

Fine. I by the time read the migration guide for updating the gem from v2 to v3, having only the dedicated library gems instead of the whole package, etc. and it all seemed to be straight forward (as in no changes in the code required).

Still, if it's likely to be the cause of the issue:

git revert 36d357bd11fc84f7525e9d5b0179934812e58a8d

I can then later on look into the details of updating the gem.

@emcoding
Copy link
Member

@klappradla I can't find any trace of AWS libraries in my External Libraries folder. So yes, I think there is a problem. I am going to revert the commit. 👾

@emcoding
Copy link
Member

@klappradla After reverting the aws gem, the same access errors occur.
Could it be that the credentials need to be updated after gem changes?

@klappradla
Copy link
Member

I haven't seen anything pointing in that direction @F3PiX. The upgrade guide for v3 does not have anything regarding credentials in it. And the guide for upgrading within the v2 versions has some bits around credentials, but nothing should be "current" enough for having caused our problem I think.

@emcoding
Copy link
Member

Okay, Thanks!!!! So, it seems highly unlikely that is has to do with AWS api. Must be something in the team, then. I'll try something else.

@carpodaster
Copy link
Member

I totally overlooked it. The AWS 403s might be related, but I'm closing this in favor of the more recent #901 and will create a new issue to investigate the possible AWS bug.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants