-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ignore .git-blame-ignore-revs hashes #1084
Comments
Thanks for opening your first issue at git-cliff! Be sure to follow the issue template! ⛰️ |
Hey, thanks for creating the issue. I agree that this would be a nice addition :) We already support a Would you be interested in contributing this? |
I am interested in contributing this! But to be honest, I'm not sure I will have the bandwidth to do so in a timely manner. If someone were to do it faster than me, I wouldn't mind and would appreciate using the feature. But I did start drafting some edits. I created a draft PR in case you'd like to check in to see what direction I'm headed in. I'm just starting to learn Rust, so any feedback would be welcomed 👍 |
Hey @michen00, thanks for picking this up! Would be better if you can submit the draft PR on this repo instead of your fork. For the first step of the implementation, I'm thinking if we should have sane defaults instead of supporting configuration for this feature. e.g. we only support ".git-blame-ignore-revs" file and always |
Yeah, this sounds sensible and easier to achieve than supporting full configuration. Let's start with this for the first step.
I'll clean up my commits and re-submit here.
Yes 👍 : I can't imagine wanting
For the next step of the implementation, I'm a little hesitant. This file can be configured via |
I think having it as a sane default would be the way to go. I don't want to do much git operations in git-cliff - but it's worth checking out if |
Is there an existing issue or pull request for this?
Feature description
git cliff
would ignore(if the file exists).
Desired solution
A config to enable this in the .toml file would be great. I think it makes sense to enable the latter option by default too.
Alternatives considered
I had a convention for commits updating that file, so I wrote a pattern for it. Then halfway through the project, I updated that convention, so I wrote another pattern. But what if I didn't have a convention?
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: