Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOCX: Support for --top-level-division=part #10576

Closed
adunning opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 0 comments
Closed

DOCX: Support for --top-level-division=part #10576

adunning opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@adunning
Copy link
Contributor

The new support for --top-level-division in the DOCX writer is incredibly useful. Would it also be possible, please, to support the part option by placing section divisions after both first- and second-level headings?

As an example, this typical way of structuring a book with front matter works with LaTeX:

pandoc --top-level-division=part -o part.pdf << EOT

## Preface

Inventore nihil ipsa libero odit. Molestiae reprehenderit pariatur nesciunt illum cumque. Facilis eius ut repellat sed. Voluptatem voluptatibus illo nulla repellendus earum corporis nisi. Deserunt doloremque repellendus porro.^[Iusto et sint aut pariatur.]

# Part 1

## Chapter 1

Sit tenetur aspernatur numquam et aliquam. Quia dolorum velit dolor inventore consequatur enim.^[Fuga deleniti doloremque dolorem quaerat.]

## Chapter 2

Provident consequatur in adipisci autem nulla dignissimos vero alias. Ratione eum officia est et.^[Voluptatibus quos et quia dolor alias ratione suscipit explicabo.]

# Part 2

## Chapter 3

Qui et voluptatem blanditiis. Necessitatibus libero incidunt dolorem ut corporis accusamus. Modi tempora numquam natus cumque quibusdam rerum officia. Consectetur quia odio enim deserunt eos expedita unde molestias. Delectus cum et enim voluptatem ut.^[Rem quo aut velit deserunt est mollitia.]

## Chapter 4

Pariatur sequi voluptatum non laboriosam. Voluptatem ullam exercitationem distinctio nostrum.^[Ad ducimus aliquid vel aperiam dignissimos error.]

EOT
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant