You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm curious if there are any plans for allowing users to add additional functionality to the library. For example, the primus project has a simple plugin system to modify and addend the simple API that it exposes. We use this to implement "rooms" and clustering across multiple app servers. It also allows addendums to the browser-facing library. I'm curious what type of pattern would be encouraged to solve similar problems.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Probably not. Not trying to compete with all the other fully featured projects out there. This is aiming to allow you to make HTTP requests over WS to existing hapi routes, with all the security and request lifecycle baked in.
This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please open a new issue for related bugs or questions following the new issue template instructions.
lockbot
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jan 9, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
supportQuestions, discussions, and general support
I'm curious if there are any plans for allowing users to add additional functionality to the library. For example, the primus project has a simple plugin system to modify and addend the simple API that it exposes. We use this to implement "rooms" and clustering across multiple app servers. It also allows addendums to the browser-facing library. I'm curious what type of pattern would be encouraged to solve similar problems.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: