You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
runtime: refactor runtime->tracer API to appear more like a lock
Currently the execution tracer synchronizes with itself using very
heavyweight operations. As a result, it's totally fine for most of the
tracer code to look like:
if traceEnabled() {
traceXXX(...)
}
However, if we want to make that synchronization more lightweight (as
issue #60773 proposes), then this is insufficient. In particular, we
need to make sure the tracer can't observe an inconsistency between g
atomicstatus and the event that would be emitted for a particular
g transition. This means making the g status change appear to happen
atomically with the corresponding trace event being written out from the
perspective of the tracer.
This requires a change in API to something more like a lock. While we're
here, we might as well make sure that trace events can *only* be emitted
while this lock is held. This change introduces such an API:
traceAcquire, which returns a value that can emit events, and
traceRelease, which requires the value that was returned by
traceAcquire. In practice, this won't be a real lock, it'll be more like
a seqlock.
For the current tracer, this API is completely overkill and the value
returned by traceAcquire basically just checks trace.enabled. But it's
necessary for the tracer described in #60773 and we can implement that
more cleanly if we do this refactoring now instead of later.
For #60773.
Change-Id: Ibb9ff5958376339fafc2b5180aef65cf2ba18646
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/515635
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
0 commit comments