-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Will nebulex support replicating cache partitions? #47
Comments
Never mind; I think my problem would be more suited to something like |
@queer about your question, yes, Nebulex will eventually implement replicated topology via #15 (adapter).
Indeed, actually memory consumption is one of the downsides of the replicated topology.
NP, thanks for the interest :)!! Replicated topology impl is in progress now (we hope to have a first draft very soon), and I'm thinking to implement a
Indeed, |
As it turns out, I've come full-circle back to looking at Nebulex, as I've not been able to get |
😄 Yeah, get |
I'm sorry if this has been asked before; I couldn't find it with a quick search.
My question is pretty much just the title. I have a real use-case for wanting to be able to replicate partitions - as a full replication à la #15 would require too much RAM usage - and I also don't have the
brain powertime/knowledge to write a partition replicator that I would have any confidence in. I'm also somewhat curious if this effect can be created by just running twoDist
caches per node - I feel like it might work but also might just double the data being stored on each node with no real gain.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: