Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Fostering High-Quality Corporate Development through ESG-Driven Technological Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the pursuit of corporate high-quality development (HQD), this research delves into the intricate relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, technological innovation, and Chinese A-share-listed companies from 2011 to 2020. We present empirical evidence of a significant positive correlation between ESG performance and HQD, enriching the landscape of sustainable business practices. Importantly, this study introduces technological innovation as a pivotal mediator in this association, shedding light on its critical role in translating ESG endeavors into superior outcomes. The theoretical implications of this research are twofold. Firstly, it solidifies the empirical basis for the positive impact of ESG performance on HQD, advancing our understanding of this critical relationship. Also, by identifying technological innovation as a mediator, this study offers a novel perspective, revealing the intricate mechanisms through which ESG practices shape high-quality corporate development. This discovery expands theoretical frameworks in sustainability and innovation management, enabling a deeper understanding of these dynamics. From a managerial perspective, this study underscores the strategic importance of integrating ESG initiatives into core business strategies. Aligning mission statements, corporate governance, and daily operations with ESG principles enhances reputation and stakeholder engagement and drives high-quality development through responsible decision-making. Moreover, transparency in ESG reporting, using frameworks like GRI and SASB, fosters trust and accountability, promoting sustainable growth. Our research also emphasizes the necessity of technology investment to facilitate high-quality development. Organizations should prioritize innovation, research, and development, as technology streamlines production, differentiates products, and reduces costs, ultimately enhancing overall performance. In terms of policy recommendations, we urge policymakers to incentivize ESG practices and technology innovation through regulations, tax incentives, and support for collaborative ecosystems. These initiatives can align economic development with sustainability goals, creating a conducive environment for responsible business practices and innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2022). Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asif, M., Searcy, C., & Castka, P. (2023). ESG and Industry 5.0: The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barman, E. (2018). Doing well by doing good: A comparative analysis of ESG standards for responsible investment. Advances in Strategic Management, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-332220180000038016

  • Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chege, S. M., & Wang, D. (2020). Information technology innovation and its impact on job creation by SMEs in developing countries: An analysis of the literature review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(3), 256–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. S., & Tsou, H. T. (2012). Performance effects of IT capability, service process innovation, and the mediating role of customer service. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Khurram, M. U., Gao, Y., Abedin, M. Z., & Lucey, B. (2023). ESG disclosure and technological innovation capabilities of the Chinese listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Wang, C., & Li, S. (2023). The impact of supply chain finance on corporate social responsibility and creating shared value: A case from the emerging economy. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(2), 324–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., kumara, E. K., & Sivakumar, V. (2021). Investigation of finance industry on risk awareness model and digital economic growth. Annals of Operations Research, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04287-7

  • Cheng-Hua, T., Shyh-Jer, C., & Shih-Chien, F. (2009). Employment modes, high-performance work practices, and organizational performance in the hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(4), 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., & Rogers, T. (2023). China market environment. Contemporary Strategic Chinese American Business Negotiations and Market Entry, 195–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6986-7_5

  • Denis, D. (2019). The case for maximizing long-run shareholder value. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(3), 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharmayanti, N., Ismail, T., Hanifah, I. A., & Taqi, M. (2023). Exploring sustainability management control system and eco-innovation matter sustainable financial performance: The role of supply chain management and digital adaptability in Indonesian context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doni, F., Corvino, A., & Bianchi Martini, S. (2019). King codes on corporate governance and ESG performance: Evidence from FTSE/JSE All-Share index. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01719-4_17

  • Dragone, G., Kerssemakers, A. A., Driessen, J. L., Yamakawa, C. K., Brumano, L. P., & Mussatto, S. I. (2020). Innovation and strategic orientations for the development of advanced biorefineries. Bioresource Technology, 302, 122847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, M., Liu, J., Kayhan Tajeddini, & Khaskheli, M. B. (2023). Digital technology application and enterprise competitiveness: the mediating role of ESG performance and green technology innovation. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03979-3

  • Feng, S., Zhang, R., & Li, G. (2022). Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 61, 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Wah, W. X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnan, L., Hinna, A., Monteduro, F., & Scarozza, D. (2013). Corporate governance and management practices: Stakeholder involvement, quality and sustainability tools adoption: Evidences in local public utilities. Journal of Management & Governance, 17, 907–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guney, Y., Hernandez-Perdomo, E., & Rocco, C. M. (2020). Does relative strength in corporate governance improve corporate performance? Empirical evidence using MCDA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(10), 1593–1618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldar, S. (2019). Towards a conceptual understanding of sustainability-driven entrepreneurship. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1157–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Q., Meadows, M., Angwin, D., Gomes, E., & Child, J. (2020). Strategic alliance research in the era of digital transformation: Perspectives on future research. British Journal of Management, 31(3), 589–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, K., & Strandvik, T. (2018). Reflections on customers’ primary role in markets. European Management Journal, 36(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, T. (2018). The role of the integrated reporting in raising awareness of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) performance. Stakeholders, Governance and Responsibility, 14, 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2043-052320180000014003

  • Huang, C. J., Ke, W. C., Chiang, R. P. Y., & Jhong, Y. C. (2023). Which of environmental, social, and governance pillars can improve merger and acquisition performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 398, 136475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, A., & Wahab, S. A. (2021). The intervention of strategic innovation practices in between regulations and sustainable business growth: A holistic perspective for Malaysian SMEs. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(3), 396–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Ni, H., Ni, Y., & Guo, X. (2023). Assessing environmental, social, and governance performance and natural resource management policies in China’s dual carbon era for a green economy. Resources Policy, 85, 104050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, A., Majocchi, A., & Piana, B. D. (2019). Not all family firms are equal: The moderating effect of family involvement on the political risk exposure of the foreign direct investment portfolio. Preliminary evidence from Spanish multinational enterprises. Thunderbird International Business Review, 61(2), 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G. J., & Whalen, D. J. (2007). Does good corporate governance reduce information asymmetry around quarterly earnings announcements? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(4), 497–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & effect: Using integrated cost systems to drive profitability and performance. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, M., & Raulinajtys-Grzybek, M. (2021). The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1270–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluza, K., Ziolo, M., & Spoz, A. (2021). Innovation and environmental, social, and governance factors influencing sustainable business models-Meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 127015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koellinger, P. (2008). The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance—Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe. Research Policy, 37(8), 1317–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Sasaki, M. (2023). The impact of state ownership on corporate social responsibility reporting: A comparison between state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises in China. Management Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189231209727

  • Li, S., & Xia, J. (2008). The roles and performance of state firms and non-state firms in China’s economic transition. World Development, 36(1), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Pang, W. (2023). The impact of digital inclusive finance on corporate ESG performance: Based on the perspective of corporate green technology innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(24), 65314–65327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Zhou, X., Jung, S., & Li, J. (2020). China’s 40-year road to innovation. Chinese Management Studies, 14(2), 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Li, M., Van Assche, A., Zheng, J., & Yang, L. (2022). Building world-class enterprises through mixed-ownership reform: Explaining performance differences in minority and majority state-owned enterprises. Chinese Management Studies, 16(4), 741–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Z. (2018). Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1368–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. G., & Qin, X. (Eds.). (2023). Global health and development: Low-carbon economy and health innovation. Springer Nature.

  • Liu, M., Tan, R., & Zhang, B. (2021). The costs of “blue sky”: Environmental regulation, technology upgrading, and labor demand in China. Journal of Development Economics, 150, 102610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., & Zhou, B. (2023). Evaluation and obstacle factors of high-quality development in coastal cities along the Yangtze River. Ocean & Coastal Management, 244, 106818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Anbumozhi, V. (2009). Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: An empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 593–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Jiang, S. (2016). Bank equity connections, intellectual property protection and enterprise innovation–A bank ownership perspective. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(3), 207–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, T. T., Wu, H. C., Jao, Y. C., Huang, S. M., Tseng, T. W., Wen, Y. S., ... & Lu, K. L. (2009). Self‐assembled arrays of single‐walled metal–organic nanotubes. Angewandte Chemie, 121(50), 9625–9628.

  • Luo, Y. (2005). Corporate governance and accountability in multinational enterprises: Concepts and agenda. Journal of International Management, 11(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, A. K. F., & Chen, Y. (2023). Board attributes, ownership structure, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from A-share listed technological companies in China. Society and Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, S., & Aquanno, S. M. (2022). The new finance capital: Corporate governance, financial power, and the state. Critical Sociology, 48(1), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manes-Rossi, F., Nicolò, G., Tiron Tudor, A., & Zanellato, G. (2021). Drivers of integrated reporting by state-owned enterprises in Europe: A longitudinal analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 586–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meressa, H. A. (2020). Growth of micro and small scale enterprises and its driving factors: Empirical evidence from entrepreneurs in emerging region of Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. H., Lye, C. T., Chan, K. H., Lim, Y. Z., & Lim, Y. S. (2020). Sustainability in Asia: The roles of financial development in environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Social Indicators Research, 150, 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Z., Liu, L., Bai, S., & Ma, Q. (2021). Can the social trust promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(37), 52157–52173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, R. A., Ghisellini, P., & Ramakrishna, S. (2020). Towards sustainable business strategies for a circular economy: Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and evaluation. An Introduction to Circular Economy, 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4_26

  • Peng, Y., & Tao, C. (2022). Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance?—From the perspective of public policy and innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quayson, M., Bai, C., Mahmoudi, A., Hu, W., Chen, W., & Omoruyi, O. (2023). Designing a decision support tool for integrating ESG into the natural resource extraction industry for sustainable development using the ordinal priority approach. Resources Policy, 85, 103988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronalter, L. M., Bernardo, M., & Romaní, J. M. (2023). Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: A cross-regional empirical study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(9), 9067–9109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, I., & Randhawa, K. (2022). Managing the risks and motivations of technology managers in open innovation: Bringing stakeholder-centric corporate governance into focus. Technovation, 114, 102437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Hawkins, B. (2004). Lean maintenance: Reduce costs, improve quality, and increase market share. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Zheng, C., & Wang, J. (2022). The role of digital economy in China’s sustainable development in a post-pandemic environment. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(1), 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Xia, J. (2022). Stakeholder interest to mitigate the agency problem in enterprise innovation and the moderating effect of ownership concentration and financial constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(4), 599–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers’ environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: The role of enterprise-level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities. In Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 679–730). North-Holland.

  • Wali, M., Nehring, M., Mehmet Kizil, & Knights, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance considerations in production scheduling optimisation for sublevel stoping mining operations: A review of relevant works and future directions. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 40(6), 2167–2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00869-0

  • Wang, C. H., & Juo, W. J. (2021). An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3241–3254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., Pan, H., Feng, Y., & Du, S. (2023a). How do ESG practices create value for businesses? Research review and prospects. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-12-2021-0515

  • Wang, W., Sun, Z., Wang, W., Hua, Q., & Wu, F. (2023b). The impact of environmental uncertainty on ESG performance: Emotional vs. rational. Journal of Cleaner Production, 397, 136528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2012). Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation—A theoretical analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Z., & Ye, B. (2014). Analyses of mediating effects: The development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5), 731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzig, J., Nuzum, A. K., & Schaltegger, S. (2023). Path dependence of accountants: Why are they not involved in corporate sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 2662–2683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, J., & Zeithaml, V. (2018). Cost-effective service excellence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, R., & He, Y. (2019). A study on the relationship between multinationality and performance: Evidence from China’s firms. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 10(7), 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. M., Li, X., Zhang, C., & Wang, S. (2023). The impact of government subsidies on technological innovation of new energy vehicle enterprises: From the perspective of industry chain. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03697-w

  • Xia, Q., Wang, B., & Gao, Q. (2023). Environment, social and governance research of infrastructure investment: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, 139030–139030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139030

  • Xiao, Q., & Cooke, F. L. (2020). Towards a hybrid model? A systematic review of human resource management research on Chinese state-owned enterprises (1993–2017). The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(1), 47–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, N., Lv, W., & Wang, J. (2023). The impact of board governance on firm risk among China’s A-share market-listed companies from 2010 to 2019. Sustainability, 15(5), 4067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. L., Chen, H. H., Li, Y., & Chen, Q. X. (2019). The role of equity balance and executive stock ownership in the innovation efficiency of renewable energy enterprises. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 11(5), 055901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5116849

  • Yang, F., Chen, T., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Can environmental, social, and governance performance drive two-way foreign direct investment behavior? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 430, 139761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139761

  • Yu, L., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Fu, Z., & Wu, Z. (2023a). Unveiling knowledge economy dynamics in China: Insights into creation, diffusion, and application across varied contexts. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01581-6

  • Yu, Y., Xu, J., Huo, B., Zhang, J. Z., & Cao, Y. (2023b). The impact of supply chain social responsibility on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahid, R. A., Saleem, A., & Maqsood, U. S. (2023). ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: Empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 44086–44099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, Y., Cai, Z., Lin, H., Yuan, M., Mao, Y., & Yu, M. (2022). Does better environmental, social, and governance induce better corporate green innovation: The mediating role of financing constraints. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1513–1526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, Y., Tan, K. H., Ji, G., Chung, L., & Tseng, M. (2017). A big data framework for facilitating product innovation processes. Business Process Management Journal, 23(3), 518–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2021). Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization. Communications of the ACM, 64(3), 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. (2021). Political and economic analysis of state-owned enterprise reform. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. (2023a). Can digital finance empowerment reduce extreme ESG hypocrisy resistance to improve green innovation?. Energy Economics, 125, 106756–106756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106756

  • Zhang, J. (2023b). Institutional investors site visits, CSR performance, and large shareholder’s expropriation. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2267223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. (2023c). The 20th CPC National Congress and China’s Foreign Policy: Implication and reflection. China International Strategy Review, 5, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-023-00127-4

  • Zhang, Y., & Mohammad, K. H. (2022). The relation among ownership, environmental, social, governance (ESG), and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China. Handbook of smart energy systems (pp. 1–21). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Kim, K., Nauright, J., & Zhang, J. J. (2023a). Stakeholders in venues of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games: a critical analysis. Sport in Society, 27(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2023.2202152

  • Zhang, W., Kwon, J. W., & Choy, M. (2023b). Localizing corporate social responsibility in China: The role of geographic proximity to political and financial centers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, X., Wan, H., & Peng, Q. (2021). Controlling shareholders’ stock pledges and strategic change: The moderating effects of corporate governance. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(4), 582–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Cai, Z., Tan, K. H., Zhang, L., Du, J., & Song, M. (2021). Technological innovation and structural change for economic development in China as an emerging market. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Liu, J., & Lai, K. H. (2016). Corporate social responsibility practices and performance improvement among Chinese national state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors acknowledge the Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning Research Project (22CGLJ13).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China

    Peiyou Yu,  Zhiji Zuo & Da Lian

Authors
  1. Peiyou Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiji Zuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Da Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Da Lian.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, P., Zuo, . & Lian, D. Fostering High-Quality Corporate Development through ESG-Driven Technological Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. J Knowl Econ 15, 17598–17629 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01793-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01793-4

Keywords