Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-source Adversarial Domain Adaptive Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Multi-classifier Alignment

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transfer learning–based fault diagnosis has received intensive attention from researchers. Under various working conditions, high-precision cross-domain fault diagnosis remains a problem due to distribution differences between different source domains and between source and target domains. Therefore, reducing the distribution difference between source domain and target domain data is crucial for improving the model’s ability to learn domain-invariant features and fault-representative features. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a multi-source adversarial domain adaptation approach for fault diagnosis, referred to as MSD-MCA, which is based on the alignment of multiple classifiers. The method constructs a sub-network for each source domain and utilizes domain adversarial training to extract domain-invariant features. It then generates a fault feature set for each source domain by leveraging the domain-invariant features corresponding to various fault types. To align the target domain with the source domains, the Wasserstein distance is calculated between the target features and each fault feature set. Minimizing the entropy of the distribution distance vector facilitates the learning of fault-representative features. Additionally, an association matrix is employed to enhance the stability of the decision boundaries during the training process. This approach improves the model’s capacity to generalize across multiple domains while effectively capturing fault-related information. To validate the efficacy of the proposed MSD-MCA method, a comparative analysis was conducted against several state-of-the-art diagnostic approaches. The evaluation was performed on bearing fault data from Case Western Reserve University, as well as two real-world industrial datasets. The results indicate that MSD-MCA shows improved accuracy and enhanced generalization capabilities across both datasets. Consequently, MSD-MCA can better learn the domain-invariant features and fault-representative features and improve the accuracy of fault diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Clark R, Zucker N, Urpelainen J. The future of coal-fired power generation in Southeast Asia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;121:109650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang X, Yang S, Wang F, et al. OrbitNet: A new CNN model for automatic fault diagnostics of turbomachines. Appl Soft Comput. 2021;110:107702.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma T, Liu S, Liu J, et al. Fault diagnosis of laminar cooling roller motor based on morphological recognition and combination patterns mining of multi-current signatures. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2023;72(3):1–15.

  4. Liu J, Xu L, Xie Y, et al. Toward robust fault identification of complex industrial processes using stacked sparse-denoising autoencoder with softmax classifier. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021;53(1):428–42.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Wang J, Liu X, et al. MWRSPCA: online fault monitoring based on moving window recursive sparse principal component analysis. J Intell Manuf. 2021;1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01721-8.

  6. Huang Z, Lei Z. A multisource dense adaptation ad-versarial network for fault diagnosis of machinery. IEEE Trans Industr Electron. 2021;69(6):6298–307.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu K, Li S, Jiang X, Lu J, Yu T, Li R. A novel transfer diagnosis method under unbalanced sample based on dis-crete-peak joint attention enhancement mechanism. Knowl-Based Syst. 2021;212:106645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bao H, Yan Z, Ji S, et al. An enhanced sparse filtering method for transfer fault diagnosis using maximum classifier discrepancy. Meas Sci Technol. 2021;32(8):085105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/abe56f.

  9. Li X, Hu Y, Zheng J, Li M, Ma W. Central moment discrepancy based domain adaptation for intelligent bearing fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing. 2021;429:12–24.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong P, Tang B, Deng L, Zhao M, Yu X. Multi-block domain adaptation with central moment discrepancy for fault diagnosis. Measurement. 2021;169:108516.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Zhang W, Ding Q, Sun J. Multi-layer domain adaptation method for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Sig-nal Processing. 2019;157:180–97.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiao J, Zhao M, Lin J, Liang K. Residual joint adapta-tion adversarial network for intelligent transfer fault diagno-sis. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2020;145:106962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu J, Shao J, Huang Z. Transfer learning method based on adversarial domain adaption for bearing fault di-agnosis. IEEE Access. 2020;8:119421–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chai Z, Zhao C. A fine-grained adversarial network method for cross-domain industrial fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2020;17(3):1432–42.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Z, He G, Li J, Liao Y, Gryllias K, Li W. Domain adversarial transfer network for cross-domain fault diagno-sis of rotary machinery. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2020;69(11):8702–12.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Li F, Tang T, Tang B, He Q. Deep convolution do-main-adversarial transfer learning for fault diagnosis of roll-ing bearings. Measurement. 2021;169:108339.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Li X, Zhang W, Ma H, Luo Z, Li X. Domain generalization in rotating machinery fault diagnostics using deep neural networks. Neurocomputing. 2020;403:409–20.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang M, Wang D, Lu W, Yang J, Li Z, Liang B. A deep transfer model with wasserstein distance guided multi-adversarial networks for bearing fault diagnosis under dif-ferent working conditions. IEEE Access. 2019;7:65303–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang B, Lei Y, Jia F, et al. An intelligent fault diagnosis approach based on transfer learning from laboratory bearings to locomotive bearings. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019;122:692–706.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang K, Chen J, Zhang T, et al. A compact convolutional neural network augmented with multiscale feature extraction of acquired monitoring data for mechanical intelligent fault diagnosis. J Manuf Syst. 2020;55:273–84.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Li X, Zhang W, Ma H, et al. Deep learning-based adversarial multi-classifier optimization for cross-domain machinery fault diagnostics. J Manuf Syst. 2020;55:334–47.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Qin Y, Yao Q, Wang Y, et al. Parameter sharing adversarial domain adaptation networks for fault transfer diagnosis of planetary gearboxes. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;160:107936.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Z, He X, Yang B, Li N. Subdomain adaptation transfer learning network for fault diagnosis of roller bearings. IEEE Trans Industr Electron. 2021;69(8):8430–9.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. She D, Jia M, Pecht MG. Weighted entropy minimization based deep conditional adversarial diagnosis approach under variable working conditions. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2020;26(5):2440–50.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang Z, Bo L, Liu X, et al. An autoencoder with adaptive transfer learning for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Meas Sci Technol. 2021;32(5):055110.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao K, Jiang H, Wu Z, et al. A novel transfer learning fault diagnosis method based on manifold embedded distribution alignment with a little labeled data. J Intell Manuf. 2022;33:151–65.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Rezaeianjouybari B, Shang Y. A novel deep multi-source domain adaptation framework for bearing fault diagnosis based on feature-level and task-specific distribution alignment. Measurement. 2021;178:109359.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu J, Chen N, Shen C. A new multiple source domain adaptation fault diagnosis method between different rotating machines. IEEE Trans Industr Inf. 2020;17(7):4788–97.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei D, Han T, Chu F, et al. Weighted domain adaptation networks for machinery fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;158:107744.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Li X, Jiang H, Xie M, et al. A reinforcement ensemble deep transfer learning network for rolling bearing fault diagnosis with multi-source domains. Adv Eng Inform. 2022;51:101480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saito K, Watanabe K, Ushiku Y, et al. Maximum classifier discrepancy for unsupervised domain adaptation. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE; 2018. pp. 3723–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00392.

  32. Li X, Zhang W, Ma H, Luo Z, Li X. Deep learning-based adversarial multi-classifier optimization for cross-domain machinery fault diagnostics. J Manufactur-ing Syst. 2020;55:334–47.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Tzeng E, et al. Deep domain confusion: maximizing for domain invariance. Computer Science. 2014.

  34. Ganin Y, Ustinova E, Ajakan H, Germain P. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. J Mach Learn Res. 2016;17(1):2096–2030.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun B, Saenko K. Deep CORAL: correlation alignment for deep domain adaptation. In: Hua G, Jégou H, editors. Computer vision – ECCV 2016 workshops. ECCV 2016. Lecture notes in computer science. vol. 9915. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 443–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_35.

  36. Zhao H, Zhang S, Wu G, et al. Multiple source domain adaptation with adversarial training of neural networks. 2017.

  37. Zhu Y, Zhuang F, Wang D. Aligning domain-specific distribution and classifier for cross-domain classification from multiple sources. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 33, issue 1. 2019. pp. 5989–996. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015989.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61971188.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianyu Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

In this study, no human or animal participants were involved; hence, ethical approval was not needed.

Informed Consent

As this study did not involve any human participants, informed consent was not needed.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Z., He, Y., Ma, T. et al. Multi-source Adversarial Domain Adaptive Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Multi-classifier Alignment. Cogn Comput 17, 68 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-025-10414-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-025-10414-4

Keywords