Abstract
We have proposed an algorithm to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. This algorithm employs the single equivalent moving dipole (SEMD) to model cardiac electrical activity. The aim of this study is to investigate the optimal time instant during the cardiac cycle as well as the number of beats needed to accurately estimate the location of a pacing site. We have evaluated this algorithm by pacing the ventricular epicardial surface and inversely estimating the locations of pacing electrodes from the recorded body surface potentials. Two pacing electrode arrays were sutured on the right and left ventricular epicardial surfaces in swine. The hearts were paced by the electrodes sequentially at multiple rates (120–220 bpm), and body surface ECG signals from 64 leads were recorded for the SEMD estimation. We evaluated the combined error of the estimated interelectrode distance and SEMD direction at each time instant during the cardiac cycle, and found the error was minimum when the normalized root mean square (RMS n ) value of body surface ECG signals reached 15 % of its maximum value. The beat-to-beat variation of the SEMD locations was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) when estimated at 15 % RMS n compared to the earliest activation time (EAT). In addition, the 5–95 % interval of the estimated interelectrode distance error decreased exponentially as the number of beats used to estimate a median beat increased. When the number of beats was 4 or larger, the 5–95 % interval was smaller than 3.5 mm (the diameter of a commonly used catheter). In conclusion, the optimal time for the SEMD estimation is at 15 % of RMS n , and at that time instant a median beat estimated from 4 beats is associated with a beat-to-beat variability of the SEMD location that is appropriate for catheter ablation procedures.





Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armoundas AA, Feldman AB, Sherman DA, Cohen RJ (2001) Applicability of the single equivalent point dipole model to represent a spatially distributed bio-electrical source. Med Biol Eng Comput 39:562–570
Armoundas AA, Feldman AB, Mukkamala R, Cohen RJ (2003) A single equivalent moving dipole model: an efficient approach for localizing sites of origin of ventricular electrical activation. Ann Biomed Eng 31:564–576
Armoundas AA, Feldman AB, Mukkamala R, He B, Mullen TJ, Belk PA, Lee YZ, Cohen RJ (2003) Statistical accuracy of a moving equivalent dipole method to identify sites of origin of cardiac electrical activation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50:1360–1370
Berger T, Fischer G, Pfeifer B, Modre R, Hanser F, Trieb T, Roithinger FX, Stuehlinger M, Pachinger O, Tilg B, Hintringer F (2006) Single-beat noninvasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology of ventricular pre-excitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2045–2052
Cheng LK, Sands GB, French RL, Withy SJ, Wong SP, Legget ME, Smith WM, Pullan AJ (2005) Rapid construction of a patient-specific torso model from 3D ultrasound for non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology. Med Biol Eng Comput 43:325–330
Fukuoka Y, Armoundas AA, Oostendorp TF, Cohen RJ (2000) Accuracy of a single equivalent moving dipole model in a realistic anatomic geometry torso model. Comput Cardiol 27:439–442
Fukuoka Y, Oostendorp TF, Cohen RJ, Armoundas AA (2001) A simulation study on a catheter navigation method for guiding the ablative therapy of cardiac arrhythmias. In 2001-Conference-Proceedings-of-the-23rd-Annual-International-Conference-of-the-IEEE-Engineering-in-Medicine-and-Biology-Society, Instanbul, pp 402–404
Fukuoka Y, Oostendorp TF, Sherman DA, Armoundas AA (2006) Applicability of the single equivalent moving dipole model in an infinite homogeneous medium to identify cardiac electrical sources: a computer simulation study in a realistic anatomic geometry torso model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:2436–2444
Fukuoka Y, Oostendorp TF, Armoundas AA (2009) Method for guiding the ablation catheter to the ablation site: a simulation and experimental study. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:267–278
Gornick CC, Adler SW, Pederson B, Hauck J, Budd J, Schweitzer J (1999) Validation of a new noncontact catheter system for electro anatomic mapping of left ventricular endocardium. Circulation 99:829–835
Ilg K, Baman TS, Gupta SK, Swanson S, Good E, Chugh A, Jongnarangsin K, Pelosi F Jr, Crawford T, Oral H, Morady F, Bogun F (2010) Assessment of radiofrequency ablation lesions by CMR imaging after ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:278–285
Modre R, Tilg B, Fischer G, Hanser F, Messnarz B, Seger M, Schocke MF, Berger T, Hintringer F, Roithinger FX (2003) Atrial noninvasive activation mapping of paced rhythm data. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14:712–719
Nademanee K, Kosar EM (1998) A nonfluoroscopic catheter-based mapping technique to ablate focal ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:1442–1447
Okishige K, Kawabata M, Umayahara S, Yamashiro K, Gotoh M, Isobe M, Strickberger SA (2003) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of various kinds of arrhythmias guided by virtual electrograms using a noncontact, computerized mapping system. Circ J 67:455–460
Ramanathan C, Ghanem RN, Jia P, Ryu K, Rudy Y (2004) Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging for cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia. Nat Med 10:422–428
Ramanathan C, Jia P, Ghanem R, Ryu K, Rudy Y (2006) Activation and repolarization of the normal human heart under complete physiological conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6309–6314
Schilling RJ, Peters NS, Davies DW (1999) Feasibility of a noncontact catheter for endocardial mapping of human ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 99:2543–2552
Schmitt C, Zrenner B, Schneider M, Karch M, Ndrepepa G, Deisenhofer I, Weyerbrock S, Schreieck J, Schomig A (1999) Clinical experience with a novel multielectrode basket catheter in right atrial tachycardias. Circulation 99:2414–2422
Smith JM, Clancy EA, Valeri CR, Ruskin JN, Cohen RJ (1988) Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. Circulation 77:110–121
Smith NP, Buist ML, Pullan AJ (2003) Altered T wave dynamics in a contracting cardiac model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14:S203–S209
Sohn K, Lv W, Lee K, Galea AM, Hirschman GB, Hayward AM, Cohen RJ, Armoundas AA (2013) The single equivalent moving dipole model does not require spatial anatomical information to determine cardiac sources of activation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 18:222–230
Sohn K, Lv W, Lee K, Galea A, Hirschman G, Barrett C, Cohen RJ, Armoundas AA (2014) A method to noninvasively identify cardiac bioelectrical sources. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1038–1050
Stevenson WG, Delacretaz E (2000) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Heart 84:553–559
Stevenson WG, Sager PT, Natterson PD, Saxon LA, Middlekauff HR, Wiener I (1995) Relation of pace mapping QRS configuration and conduction delay to ventricular tachycardia reentry circuits in human infarct scars. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:481–488
Stevenson WG, Delacretaz E, Friedman PL, Ellison KE (1998) Identification and ablation of macro reentrant ventricular tachycardia with the CARTO electro anatomical mapping system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:1448–1456
Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Kocovic D, Sager PT, Saxon LA, Pavri B (1998) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation 98:308–314
Wang Y, Cuculich PS, Zhang J, Desouza KA, Vijayakumar R, Chen J, Faddis MN, Lindsay BD, Smith TW, Rudy Y (2011) Noninvasive electro anatomic mapping of human ventricular arrhythmias with electrocardiographic imaging. Sci Trans Med 3:98ra84
Zhang X, Ramachandra I, Liu Z, Muneer B, Pogwizd SM, He B (2005) Noninvasive three-dimensional electrocardiographic imaging of ventricular activation sequence. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289:H2724–H2732
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by NIH grant 1RO1HL103961.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sohn, K., Armoundas, A.A. On the efficiency and accuracy of the single equivalent moving dipole method to identify sites of cardiac electrical activation. Med Biol Eng Comput 54, 1611–1619 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1437-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1437-x