Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Effects of patent policy on innovation outputs and commercialization: evidence from universities in China

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the important source of scientific and technological innovation in China, the improvement of productivity from the patent commercialization in universities and research institutes is of great significance to the promotion of China’s sustainable economic development. Despite the quantity of patent applications from universities has increased dramatically in recent years, the rate of patent commercialization is somewhat lower than we expect. The purpose of our study is to examine whether the incentive patent policy has effectively enhanced the patent outputs and commercialization of universities in China. We determine the specific patent policy based on the information collection and measure the specific effect of the patent policy by using the data of the 64 universities that were directly under the Ministry of Education from 2009 to 2015. As a result, we find that although the policy has increased a university’s patent output, it does not encourage the patent’s commercialization. This is because to a certain extent, the policy has a negative impact on the enthusiasm of the university patent commercialization. Therefore, we argue that patent policies focusing on the quantity in the short term can improve the innovation output but will have a negative impact on university’s sustainable development in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: the annual report of the patent statistics of the State Intellectual Property Office (1995–2016)

Fig. 2

Source: Chinese patent survey data report of the State Intellectual Property Office (2015)

Fig. 3

Source: Chinese patent survey data report of the State Intellectual Property Office (2015)

Fig. 4

Source: Chinese patent survey data report of the State Intellectual Property Office (2015)

Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (Available here http://www.most.gov.cn/ztzl/jqzzcx/zzcxcxzzo/zzcxcxzz/zzcxgncxzz/200512/t20051230_27344.htm).

  2. The law was adopted in 1993 and was revised in 2007 (Available here http://www.yanta.gov.cn/xwzx/bmdt/gkjj/46514.htm).

  3. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2009/indexch.htm.

  4. Patents are divided into three types (inventions, utility model, and design) in China. An invention patent refers to a new technical proposal for a product, a method, or an improvement for them. A utility model patent refers to a new technical scheme that is suitable for the shape, structure, or combination of the product. A design patent refers to a new design for the shape, pattern, or color of a product with a good sense of beauty and that is suitable for industrial application.

  5. www.bjipo.gov.cn/zcfg/dfxfg/201405/t20140527_32698.html.

  6. The legal database we use basically includes all the laws, administrative regulations, local laws and regulations promulgated by the legislature at all levels, from the central to the local level, and is available at http://www.pkulaw.cn/.

References

  • Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, N. (2011). University patenting: patterns of faculty motivations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(2), 103–121.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., & Chang, X. H. (2015). Why so many faculty patents are assigned to outside of university? Business Review, 27, 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., Jang, D., Jun, S., & Park, S. (2015). A predictive model of technology transfer using patent analysis. Sustainability, 7(12), 16175–16195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Y., Popp, D., & Bretschneider, S. (2005). Institutions and intellectual property: The influence of institutional forces on university patenting. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(3), 579–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbin, A., & Drnovsek, M. (2016). Determinants and public policy implications of academic-industry knowledge transfer in life sciences: A review and a conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 979–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy, 40(8), 1068–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, H. M., & Jaenicke, J. (2012). What drives patenting and commercialisation activity at East German universities? The role of new public policy, institutional environment and individual prior knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 454–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur, W., & Park, J. (2016). Network patterns of inventor collaboration and their effects on innovation outputs. Sustainability, 8(4), 295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2010). The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh–Dole effect. Scientometrics, 83(2), 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. W., Cao, Y. Y., & Chen, T. X. (2009). The key determinants of patent implementation in China’s colleges and universities: Evidence from Zhejiang province. Studies in Science of Science, 27, 1185–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2011). Public science and public innovation: Assessing the relationship between patenting at U.S. National Laboratories and the Bayh–Dole act. Research Policy, 40(8), 1094–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, X. N., & Wang, J. (2015). Motivation and quality effect of China’s patent boom. The Journal of World Economy, 6, 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Giuck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2007). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, G. E. (2016). Technology innovation policy at the local level: The United States experience. Local Government Law Journal, 16(2), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampat, B. N. (2006). Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh–Dole. Research Policy, 35(6), 772–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2005). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh–Dole act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., Archerd, C. J., & Campbell, T. I. D. (2004). Campbell, boundaries and quandaries: How professors negotiate market relations. Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 129–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2011). Has the Bayh–Dole act compromised basic research? Research Policy, 40(8), 1077–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, A. A., & Raudensky, M. (2014). Assessments of technology transfer activities of US universities and associated impact of Bayh–Dole Act. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1851–1869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, J. E. (2013). Redeploying Bayh–Dole: Beyond merely doing good to optimizing the potential in results of taxpayer-funded research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 911–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. M., Teng, Q., & Lu, F. F. (2013). The analysis on the factors affecting the transformation of patents in university and the countermeasures. Science Research Management, 34, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Welch, E. W., & Huang, W. (2015). Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents. Technovation, 36–37, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. H., & Luo, J. W. (2009). Analysis on the influence of the patent funding policy of Shanghai for the figure of patent application. Studies in Science of Science, 27(5), 682–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. R., & Yuan, X. D. (2014). Have Chinese Bayh–Dole like rules promoted university’ s patent output? Studies in Science of Science, 32, 1859–1866.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., & Wu, G. (2017). Evolution of the Chinese Industry-University-Research collaborative innovation system. Complexity, 2017(1), 1–13.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was financially supported by National Social Science Fund of China (14BRK003), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2016022), The Teaching Reform Research Project of Hubei Province (2016006) and The Teaching Reform Research Project of Wuhan University(2016013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China

    Hong Gong & Shan Peng

  2. Research Center for China Industry-University-Research Institute Collaboration of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Hong Gong

Authors
  1. Hong Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shan Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, H., Peng, S. Effects of patent policy on innovation outputs and commercialization: evidence from universities in China. Scientometrics 117, 687–703 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2893-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2893-5

Keywords