Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Interdisciplinary topics of information science: a study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interdisciplinarity is increasingly widespread. Many technological frontiers and hotspots are emerging in the intersecting research areas. The existing measurement indexes of interdisciplinarity are mostly based on the co-occurrence of authors, institutions, or references, and most focus on the tendency to interdisciplinarity. This paper introduces a new measurement index entitled topic terms interdisciplinarity (TI) for interdisciplinarity topic mining. Taking Information Science & Library Science (LIS) as a case study, this paper identifies interdisciplinary topics by calculating TI values together with Bet values, term frequency values, and others, and analyzes the evolution of interdisciplinary sciences based on social network analysis and time series analysis. It was found that the intersections of external disciplines and pivots of internal topics for LIS can be identified by the utilization of TI value and Bet values. The research has shown that the TI value can identify interdisciplinary topic terms well, and it will be an efficient indicator for interdisciplinary analysis by being complementary to other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjorn, H. (2010). Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics, 86(3), 705–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. W., & Huang, M. H. (2012). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, T., Xu, H. Y., & Yue, Z. H. (2015). The visualization situation analysis on the interdisciplinary of information science. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 38(9), 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, J. M. (1992). Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization. College & Research Libraries, 53(4), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2010). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2011). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Rafols, I., & Chen, C. M. (2013). Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2573–2586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. L., Liu, F. F., & Guo, F. J. (2013). Analysis on interdisciplinary research topics with cinder of overlapping communities visualization software—taking the information science and computer science for example. Library and Information Service, 57(7), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. L., Zhi, L., & Ji, X. M. (2011). Evaluation to disciplines journal based on centrality analysis—A case study in 3 disciplines including information science. Information studies: Theory & Application, 35(6), 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2009). Whole network lecture: UCINET software practical guide. Shanghai: Gezhi Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J. D. (2005). Social Network Analysis Lecture. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J. D., Chi, S. C., & Lin, D. (2002). Who is trust worthy: A comparison of social relations across the Taiwan Strait. In Conference of North American Chinese sociologists association. Chicago.

  • Min, C., & Sun, J. J. (2014). Clustering analysis on discipline-crossing research hotspots: An example of library and information science and journalism and communication studies. Library and Information Service, 58(1), 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D. E. (1985). An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8(3–4), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., & Heberger, A. E. (2008). How interdisciplinary is a given body of research. Research Evaluation, 17(4), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, L. (1992). A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Evaluation, 2(3), 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, X. J. (2007). Community finding in complex networks by evaluating local community structure. Computer Engineering and Applications, 43(23), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, J. X. (2010). Interdiscipline knowledge discovery and its visualization research. Nanjing: Nanjing University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. Y., Liu, C. J., Lei, B. X., Li, H. L., & Fang, S. (2014). Measurement visualization and application of interdisciplinary research. Library and Information Service, 58(12), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. Y., Yin, C. X., & Guo, T. (2015). Interdisciplinary Research Review. Library and Information Series, 59(5), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. B., Zhou, Q. J., & Jin, B. H. (2009). The interdisciplinary measure and empirical research based on bibliometrics. Library and information Service, 53(10), 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Zhang, R. J., & Yang, Y. N. (2013). A research of interdiscipline based on information science. Journal of intelligence, 32(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. Z., Han, T., & Wang, X. M. (2013). An analysis on interdisciplinary of library and information science based on references’ subject category. Library and Information Service, 57(1), 108–111.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. L., Wei, J. X., Du, Z. D., Liu, X., Yan, S., Feng, Z., et al. (2011). Interdisciplinary research based on social complex network. Journal of Intelligence, 30(10), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work in this paper was supported by National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 14CTQ033), and West Light Foundation of Chinese Academy of Science (Grant No. Y4C0091001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chengdu Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 16, South Section 2, Yihuan Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Haiyun Xu, Ting Guo, Lijie Ru & Shu Fang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100040, People’s Republic of China

    Ting Guo & Lijie Ru

  3. Information Engineering Faculty, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, 276826, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Zenghui Yue

Authors
  1. Haiyun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ting Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zenghui Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lijie Ru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shu Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiyun Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, H., Guo, T., Yue, Z. et al. Interdisciplinary topics of information science: a study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series. Scientometrics 106, 583–601 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1792-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1792-2

Keywords