Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Zhang Neural Dynamics Approximated by Backward Difference Rules in Form of Time-Delay Differential Equation

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time-varying matrix inversion (TVMI) and tracking control of vehicular inverted pendulum (VIP) system are usually considered as two important benchmarking examples in mathematical science and control fields. In this paper, Zhang neural dynamics (ZND) method is used for solving these two problems. Besides, in order to investigate the effect of time delay (especially the time delay caused by the derivative approximation) on the ZND method when solving the above-mentioned two problems, backward difference rules in the form of time-delay differential equation are elegantly applied to approximating the ZND method, which is simply termed time-delay ZND method. Moreover, two theorems about time-delay ZND method are presented together with theoretical proofs. Finally, simulative tests of TVMI and tracking control of VIP system are conducted to show the effectiveness and accuracy of non-time-delay and time-delay ZND methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Jin L, Li S, La HM, Luo X (2017) Manipulability optimization of redundant manipulators using dynamic neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64:4710–4720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu WP, Ahmad MO (2002) Weighted least-square design of FIR filters using a fast iterative matrix inversion algorithm. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Fundam Theor Appl 49:1620–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gu C, Xue H (2009) A shift-splitting hierarchical identification method for solving Lyapunov matrix equations. Linear Algebra Appl 430:1517–1530

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cao J, Wang X (2008) New recursive algorithm for matrix inversion. J Syst Eng Electron 19:381–384

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Vajargah BF (2007) Different stochastic algorithms to obtain matrix inversion. Appl Math Comput 189:1841–1846

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma G, Agarwala A, Bhattacharya B (2013) A fast parallel Gauss Jordan algorithm for matrix inversion using CUDA. Comput Struct 128:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao L (2016) A new design formula exploited for accelerating Zhang neural network and its application to time-varying matrix inversion. Theor Comput Sci 647:50–58

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanimirovic PS, Petkovic MD, Gerontitis D (2018) Gradient neural network with nonlinear activation for computing inner inverses and the Drazin inverse. Neural Process Lett 48:109–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang C, Jiang Y, Li Z, He W, Su CY (2017) Neural control of bimanual robots with guaranteed global stability and motion precision. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 13:1162–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang Q, Wang X (2014) Backstepping generalized synchronization for neural network with delays based on tracing control method. Neural Comput Appl 24:775–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiao L (2017) A finite-time convergent Zhang neural network and its application to real-time matrix square root finding. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3010-z

  12. Guo Z, Yang S, Wang J (2016) Global synchronization of stochastically disturbed memristive neurodynamics via discontinuous control laws. IEEE CAA J Autom Sin 3:121–131

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Chen B, Lin C (2012) Adaptive neural control for strict-feedback stochastic nonlinear systems with time-delay. Neurocomputing 77:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang H, Liu X, Liu K (2016) Robust adaptive neural tracking control for a class of stochastic nonlinear interconnected systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 27:510–523

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen K, Yi C (2016) Robustness analysis of a hybrid of recursive neural dynamics for online matrix inversion. Appl Math Comput 273:969–975

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Li S, Cui H, Li Y, Liu B, Lou Y (2013) Decentralized control of collaborative redundant manipulators with partial command coverage via locally connected recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 23:1051–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabouri JK, Effati S, Pakdaman M (2017) A neural network approach for solving a class of fractional optimal control problems. Neural Process Lett 45:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li S, Chen S, Liu B (2013) Accelerating a recurrent neural network to finite-time convergence for solving time-varying Sylvester equation by using a sign-bi-power activation function. Neural Process Lett 37:189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo J, Meng Z, Xiang Z (2018) Passivity analysis of stochastic memristor-based complex-valued recurrent neural networks with mixed time-varying delays. Neural Process Lett 47:1097–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Niamsup P, Ratchagit K, Phat VN (2015) Novel criteria for finite-time stabilization and guaranteed cost control of delayed neural networks. Neurocomputing 160:281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang S, Guo Z, Wang J (2017) Global synchronization of multiple recurrent neural networks with time delays via impulsive interactions. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28:1657–1667

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ratchagit K (2007) Asymptotic stability of delay-difference system of Hopfield neural networks via matrix inequalities and application. Int J Neural Syst 17:425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen K (2016) Improved neural dynamics for online Sylvester equations solving. Inf Process Lett 116:455–459

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Saravanakumar R, Rajchakit G, Ali MS, Joo YH (2017) Extended dissipativity of generalised neural networks including time delays. Int J Syst Sci 48:2311–2320

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Y, Ma W, Cai B (2009) From Zhang neural network to Newton iteration for matrix inversion. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Regul Pap 56:1405–1415

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo D, Zhang Y (2012) Zhang neural network, Getz-Marsden dynamic system, and discrete-time algorithms for time-varying matrix inversion with application to robots’ kinematic control. Neurocomputing 97:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo D, Qiu B, Ke Z, Yang Z (2014) Case study of Zhang matrix inverse for different ZFs leading to different nets. In: Proceedings of international joint conference on neural networks. pp 2764–2769

  28. Fella C, Abderrazak B, Abdelhak B (2018) A simplified architecture of the Zhang neural network for Toeplitz linear systems solving. Neural Process Lett 47:391–401

    Google Scholar 

  29. Getz N, Marsden J (1997) Dynamical methods for polar decomposition and inversion of matrices. Linear Algebra Its Appl 258:311–343

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen K (2013) Recurrent implicit dynamics for online matrix inversion. Appl Math Comput 219:10218–10224

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Y, Yan X, Liao B, Zhang Y, Ding Y (2016) Z-type control of populations for Lotka-Volterra model with exponential convergence. Math Biosci 272:15–23

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Jin L, Zhang Y, Qiao T, Tan M, Zhang Y (2016) Tracking control of modified Lorenz nonlinear system using ZG neural dynamics with additive input or mixed inputs. Neurocomputing 196:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y, Yi C, Guo D, Zheng J (2011) Comparison on Zhang neural dynamics and gradient-based neural dynamics for online solution of nonlinear time-varying equation. Neural Comput Appl 20:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mao M, Li W, Qiu B, Tan H, Zhang Y (2015) ZG control for nonlinear system 2-output tracking with GD used additionally once more. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on computer science and network technology. pp 1541–1544

  35. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Chen D, Xiao Z, Yan X (2016) From Davidenko method to Zhang dynamics for nonlinear equation systems solving. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 99:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yang C, Li Z, Cui R, Xu B (2014) Neural network-based motion control of an underactuated wheeled inverted pendulum model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 25:2004–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gordillo F, Aracil J (2008) A new controller for the inverted pendulum on a cart. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 18:1607–1621

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Y, Qiu B, Liao B, Yang Z (2017) Control of pendulum tracking (including swinging up) of IPC system using zeroing-gradient method. Nonlinear Dyn 89:1–25

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou F, Ma C (2018) Mittag-Leffler stability and global asymptotically \(\omega \)-periodicity of fractional-order BAM neural networks with time-varying delays. Neural Process Lett 47:71–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu M, Jiang H, Hu C (2018) New results for exponential synchronization of memristive Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with time-varying delays. Neural Process Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-017-9728-x

  41. Samidurai R, Rajavel S, Cao J, Alsaedi A, Ahmad B (2018) New delay-dependent stability criteria for impulsive neural networks with additive time-varying delay components and leakage term. Neural Process Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-9855-z

  42. Li Y, Qin J, Li B (2018) Anti-periodic solutions for quaternion-valued high-order Hopfield neural networks with time-varying delays. Neural Process Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-9867-8

  43. Tang Z, Park JH, Feng J (2018) Impulsive effects on quasi-synchronization of neural networks with parameter mismatches and time-varying delay. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29:908–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wei Y, Park JH, Karimi HR, Tian Y-C, Jung H (2018) Improved stability and stabilization results for stochastic synchronization of continuous-time semi-Markovian jump neural networks with time-varying delay. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29:2488–2501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Xiang H (2016) Oscillation of third-order nonlinear neutral differential equations with distributed time delay. Ital J Pure Appl Math 36:769–782

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Kumar S, Kumar M (2014) High order parameter-uniform discretization for singularly perturbed parabolic partial differential equations with time delay. Comput Math Appl 68:1355–1367

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Jin L, Zhang Y, Qiu B (2018) Neural network-based discrete-time Z-type model of high accuracy in noisy environments for solving dynamic system of linear equations. Neural Comput Appl 29:1217–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang Y, Qiu B, Jin L, Guo D, Yang Z (2015) Infinitely many Zhang functions resulting in various ZNN models for time-varying matrix inversion with link to Drazin inverse. Inf Process Lett 115:703–706

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Hairer E, Wanner G (1991) Solving ordinary differential equations II. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Pearson D (1995) Calculus and ordinary differential equations. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang J (2011) Simulation studies of inverted pendulum based on PID controllers. Simul Model Pract Theory 19:440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Poorhossein A, Vahidian-Kamyad A (2010) Design and implementation of Sugeno controller for inverted pendulum on a cart system. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on intelligent systems and informatics. pp 641–646

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (with number 61473323). Kindly note that all authors of the paper are jointly of the first authorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Yunong Zhang, Jinjin Guo, Binbin Qiu & Wan Li

  2. Key Laboratory of Machine Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Yunong Zhang, Jinjin Guo, Binbin Qiu & Wan Li

Authors
  1. Yunong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinjin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Binbin Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunong Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Guo, J., Qiu, B. et al. Zhang Neural Dynamics Approximated by Backward Difference Rules in Form of Time-Delay Differential Equation. Neural Process Lett 50, 1735–1753 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-9956-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-9956-8

Keywords