Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Retinal Ganglion Cells from β-III Stained Fluorescent Microscopic Images

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optic nerve crush in mouse model is widely used for investigating the course following retinal ganglion cell (RGCs) injury. Manual cell counting from β-III tubulin stained microscopic images has been routinely performed to monitor RGCs after an optic nerve crush injury, but is time-consuming and prone to observer variability. This paper describes an automatic technique for RGC identification. We developed and validated (i) a sensitive cell candidate segmentation scheme and (ii) a classifier that removed false positives while retaining true positives. Two major contributions were made in cell candidate segmentation. First, a homomorphic filter was designed to adjust for the inhomogeneous illumination caused by uneven penetration of β-III tubulin antibody. Second, the optimal segmentation parameters for cell detection are highly image-specific. To address this issue, we introduced an offline-online parameter tuning approach. Offline tuning optimized model parameters based on training images and online tuning further optimized the parameters at the testing stage without needing access to the ground truth. In the cell identification stage, 31 geometric, statistical and textural features were extracted from each segmented cell candidate, which was subsequently classified as true or false positives by support vector machine. The homomorphic filter and the online parameter tuning approach together increased cell recall by 28%. The entire pipeline attained a recall, precision and coefficient of determination (r2) of 85.3%, 97.1% and 0.994. The availability of the proposed pipeline will allow efficient, accurate and reproducible RGC quantification required for assessing the death/survival of RGCs in disease models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curcio M, Bradke F: Axon regeneration in the central nervous system: Facing the challenges from the inside. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 34: 495–521, 2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY: Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121: 2081–2090, 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pernet V, Schwab ME: Lost in the jungle: new hurdles for optic nerve axon regeneration. Trends Neurosci 37: 381–387, 2014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuszynski MH, Steward O: Concepts and methods for the study of axonal regeneration in the cns. Neuron 74: 777–791, 2012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurimoto T, Yin Y, Omura K, Gilbert HY, Kim D, Cen LP, Moko L, Kügler S., Benowitz LI: Long-distance axon regeneration in the mature optic nerve: contributions of oncomodulin, camp, and pten gene deletion. J Neurosci 30: 15654–15663, 2010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun F, Park KK, Belin S, Wang D, Lu T, Chen G, Zhang K, Yeung C, Feng G, Yankner BA, He Z: Sustained axon regeneration induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3. Nature 480: 372–375, 2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg JL, Espinosa JS, Xu Y, Davidson N, Kovacs GTA, Barres BA: Retinal ganglion cells do not extend axons by default: promotion by neurotrophic signaling and electrical activity. Neuron 33: 689–702, 2002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu K, Tedeschi A, Park KK, He Z: Neuronal intrinsic mechanisms of axon regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 34: 131–152, 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erskine L, Herrera E: The retinal ganglion cell axon’s journey: insights into molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Dev Biol 308: 1–14, 2007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pernet V, Joly S, Dalkara D, Jordi N, Schwarz O, Christ F, Schaffer DV, Flannery JG, Schwab ME: Long-distance axonal regeneration induced by cntf gene transfer is impaired by axonal misguidance in the injured adult optic nerve. Neurobiol Dis 51: 202–213, 2013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang TL, Huang SP, Chang CH, Lin KH, Sheu MM, Tsai RK: Factors influencing the retrograde labeling of retinal ganglion cells with fluorogold in an animal optic nerve crush model. Ophthalmic Res 51: 173–178, 2014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang SM, Zeng LP, Zeng JH, Tang L, Chen XM, Wei X: β-III-Tubulin: a reliable marker for retinal ganglion cell labeling in experimental models of glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 8: 643–652, 2015

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen H, Wei X, Cho KS, Chen G, Sappington R, Calkins DJ, Chen DF: Optic neuropathy due to microbead-induced elevated intraocular pressure in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 36–44, 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzgerald M, Bartlett CA, Evill L, Rodger J, Harvey AR, Dunlop SA: Secondary degeneration of the optic nerve following partial transection: the benefits of lomerizine. Exp Neurol 216: 219–230, 2009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Y, Cui Q, Harvey AR: Interactive effects of c3, cyclic amp and ciliary neurotrophic factor on adult retinal ganglion cell survival and axonal regeneration. Mol Cell Neurosci 34: 88–98, 2007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith PD, Sun F, Park KK, Cai B, Wang C, Kuwako K, Martinez-Carrasco I, Connolly L, He Z: SOCS3 deletion promotes optic nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron 64: 617–623, 2009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pimentel B, Sanz C, Varela-Nieto I, Rapp UR, De Pablo F, de La Rosa EJ: c-Raf regulates cell survival and retinal ganglion cell morphogenesis during neurogenesis. J Neurosci 20: 3254–3262, 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dordea AC, Bray MA, Allen K, Logan DJ, Fei F, Malhotra R, Gregory MS, Carpenter AE, Buys ES: An open-source computational tool to automatically quantify immunolabeled retinal ganglion cells. Exp Eye Res 147: 50–56, 2016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li W, Germain RN, Gerner MY: Multiplex, quantitative cellular analysis in large tissue volumes with clearing-enhanced 3D microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114: E7321—E7330, 2017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xing F, Yang L: Robust nucleus/cell detection and segmentation in digital pathology and microscopy images: A comprehensive review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 9: 234–263, 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones TR, Carpenter AE, Lamprecht MR, Moffat J, Silver SJ, Grenier JK, Castoreno AB, Eggert US, Root DE, Golland P, Sabatini DM: Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 1826–1831, 2009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hodneland E, Bukoreshtliev NV, Eichler TW, Tai XC, Gurke S, Lundervold A, Gerdes HH: A unified framework for automated 3-D segmentation of surface-stained living cells and a comprehensive segmentation evaluation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28: 720–738, 2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weickert J: Coherence-enhancing diffusion filtering. Int J Comput Vis 31 (2): 111–127, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weickert J: A review of nonlinear diffusion filtering. In: (ter Haar Romeny B, Florack L, Koenderink J, Viergever M, Eds.) Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision. Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp 1–28

  25. Kimmel R, Malladi R, Sochen N: Images as embedded maps and minimal surfaces: movies, color, texture, and volumetric medical images. Int J Comput Vis 39 (2): 111–129, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital image processing, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xing F, Xie Y, Yang L: An automatic learning-based framework for robust nucleus segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35: 550–566, 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Kofahi Y, Zaltsman A, Graves R, Marshall W, Rusu M: A deep learning-based algorithm for 2-D cell segmentation in microscopy images. BMC Bioinform 19: 365, 2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Falk T, Mai D, Bensch R, Çiçek z., Abdulkadir A, Marrakchi Y, Böhm A, Deubner J, Jäckel Z, Seiwald K, Dovzhenko A, Tietz O, Dal Bosco C, Walsh S, Saltukoglu D, Tay TL, Prinz M, Palme K, Simons M, Diester I, Brox T, Ronneberger O: U-net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat Methods 16: 67–70, 2019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hodneland E, Kögel T, Frei DM, Gerdes HH, Lundervold A: CellSegm - a MATLAB toolbox for high-throughput 3D cell segmentation. Source Code Biol Med 8: 16, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gautama S, Goeman W, D’Haeyer J: Robust detection of road junctions in vhr images using an improved ridge detector.. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol 35, 2004, pp 815–819

  32. Cortes C, Vapnik V: Support-vector networks. Machine learning 20 (3): 273–297, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL: Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB London: Pearson Education, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ubul K, Yadikar N, Amat A, Aysa A, Yibulayin T: Uyghur document image retrieval based on gray gradient co-occurrence matrix.. In: 2015 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), 2015, pp 762–766

  35. Dietterich TG: Ensemble methods in machine learning.. In: Multiple Classifier Systems. Springer, Berlin, 2000, pp 1–15

  36. Walpole RE, Myers RH: Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Eddie Ma and Mr. Bennett Au from Department of Biomedical Sciences at City University of Hong Kong for their help in establishing the TUJ1 immunostaining protocol.

Funding

Dr. Chiu received funding support from the Research Grant Council of the HKSAR, China (Project No. CityU 11205917), and the City University of Hong Kong Strategic Research Grants (No. 7005226).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Chiu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval for the study protocol was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of City University of Hong Kong (Reference No. 2011SRG100).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gai, H., Wang, Y., Chan, L.L.H. et al. Identification of Retinal Ganglion Cells from β-III Stained Fluorescent Microscopic Images. J Digit Imaging 33, 1352–1363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00365-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00365-7

Keywords