Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Data Marketplaces: Trends and Monetisation of Data Goods

  • Forum
  • Published:
Intereconomics

Abstract

Despite the large number of academic contributions, there is no uniform definition of data marketplaces.However, different data marketplaces may vary from eachother in terms of their underlying business model, type ofdata offered, functionality, market mechanisms, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Stahl, F. Schomm, G. Vossen: The data marketplace survey revisited, ERCIS Working Papers 18, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), 2014. Markus Spiekermann, Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering, Dortmund, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. A. Fricker, Y.V. Maksimov: Pricing of Data Products in Data Marketplaces, in: A. Ojala, H. Holmström Olsson, K. Werder (eds.), International Conference of Software Business, 2017, pp. 49–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Otto, H. Österle: Corporate Data Quality - Prerequisite for Successful Business Models, Berlin 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Spiekermann, D. Tebernum, S. Wenzel, B. Otto: A metadata model for data goods, in: P. Drews, B. Funk, P. Niemeyer, L. Xie (eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), 2018, pp. 326–337.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Muschalle, F. Stahl, A. Löser, G. Vossen: Pricing Approaches for Data Markets, in: M. Castellanos, U. Dayal, E.A. Rundensteiner (eds.): Enabling Real-Time Business Intelligence, 2012, pp. 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Koutroumpis, A. Leiponen, L. Thomas: The (Unfulfilled) Potential of Data Marketplaces, Working Paper No. 53, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Spiekermann, S. Wenzel, B. Otto: A conceptual model of benchmarking data and its implications for data mapping in the data economy, in: P. Drews, B. Funk, P. Niemeyer, L. Xie (eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), 2018, pp. 314–325

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Moody, P. Walsh: Measuring the Value of Information: An Asset Valuation Approach, in: J. Pries-Heje, C. Ciborra, K. Kautz, J. Valor, E. Christiansen, D. Avison et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems, 1999, pp. 496–512.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K.J. Arrow: Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton 1962, Princeton University Press, S. 609–626

  10. F. Stahl, F. Schomm, L. Vomfell, G. Vossen: Marketplaces for Digital Data: Quo Vadis?, in: Computer and Information Science, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2017, pp. 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Miller: Nurturing the market for Data Markets, 2012, available at https://www.cloudave.com/16572/nurturing-the-market-for-datamarkets/.

  12. S. von Engelhardt, L. Wangler, S. Wischmann: Eigenschaften und Erfolgsfaktoren digitaler Plattformen, iit-Institut für Innovation und Technik in der VDI/VDE Innovation+ Technik GmbH, Berlin 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kampmann, J. Walter: Mikroökonomie. Markt, Wirtschaftsordnung, Wettbewerb, First Edition, München 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Clement, D. Schreiber: Internetökonomie. Grundlagen und Fallbeispiele der vernetzten Wirtschaft, Third Edition, Heidelberg 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Stahl, F. Schomm, G. Vossen, L. Vomfell: A classification framework for data marketplaces, in: Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2016, pp. 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. One example is the three-year study by F. Stahl, F. Schomm, G. Vossen: Marketplaces for data: An initial survey, ERCIS Working Papers 14, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), 2012, which uses the term “data marketplace” as a subtype of a “data provider”; F. Stahl et al.: A classifi cation framework…, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.A. Fricker, Y.V. Maksimov, H. Holmström Olsson, K. Werder (eds.), International Conference of Software Business, 2017, pp. 49–66 op. cit. }

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Koutroumpis et al. op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Lange, F. Stahl, G. Vossen: Datenmarktplätze in verschiedenen Forschungsdisziplinen: Eine Übersicht, in: Informatik Spektrum, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2018, pp. 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S.A. Fricker, Y.V. Maksimov, H. Holmström Olsson, K. Werder (eds.), International Conference of Software Business, 2017, pp. 49–66 op. cit. }

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. It is important to note that as of today there are no ownership rights in data. The current discussion sees an increasing need for contractual arrangements in the data goods trade, see H. Richter, P.R. Slowinski: The Data Sharing Economy: On the Emergence of New Intermediaries, in: IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2019, pp. 4–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Stahl, F. Schomm, G. Vossen: Marketplaces for data...,.op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See A. Hanelt, B. Hildebrandt, J. Polier: Uncovering the Role of IS in Business Model Innovation - A Taxonomy-Driven Approach to Structure the Field In: Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.L. Glass, I. Vessey: Contemporary Application-Domain Taxonomies, in: IEEE Software, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1995, pp. 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O. Gassmann, K. Frankenberger, M. Csik: Geschäftsmodelle entwickeln. 55 innovative Konzepte mit dem St. Gallener Business Model Navigator, München 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. M.M. Al-Debei, R. El-Haddadeh, D. Avison: Defining the Business Model in the New World of Digital Business, Proceedings of the 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.M. Al-Debei, D. Avison: Developing a Unified Framework of the Business Model Concept, in: European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2010, pp. 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. von Engelhardt et al., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See T. Ritchey: Problem Structuring Using Computer-Aided Morphological Analysis, in: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 47, No. 7, 2006, pp. 792–801.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Richter, P.R. Slowinski, op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Lange et al., op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P. Koutroumpis et al., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. Stahl, A. Löser, G. Vossen: Preismodelle für Datenmarktplätze, in: Informatik-Spektrum, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2015, pp. 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Lange et al., op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. B. Otto, H. Österle, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  36. IDC: FutureScape for Big Data and Analytics, 2015, available at https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20141211005981/en/IDC-Reveals-Worldwide-Big-Data-Analytics-Predictions (22.7.2019).

  37. P. Koutroumpis et al., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. Miller, op. cit.

  39. P. Miller, op. cit.

  40. F. Stahl et al.: Marketplaces for data..., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. Moody, P. Walsh, C. Ciborra, K. Kautz, J. Valor, E. Christiansen, D. Avison et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems, 1999, pp. 496–512 op. cit. }

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. Richter, P.R. Slowinski, op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. B. Benders, C. Burkard, J. Küfen, Y. Ostad: Wirtschaftliche Verwertungsmöglichkeiten für Mobilitäts- und Infrastrukturdaten, IKT für Elektromobilität, Berlin 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. Lange et al., op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. P. Koutroumpis et al.,.op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  46. F. Stahl et al.: Marketplaces for data..., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  47. T.D. Cao, T.V. Pham, Q.H. Vu, H.L. Truong, D.H. Le, S. Dust-dar: MARSA: A marketplace for realtime human sensing data, in: ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), Vol. 16, No. 3, 2016, pp. 16–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. P. Gupta, S.S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak: A Decentralized IoT Data Marketplace, Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Distributed Ledger Technology, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Lange et al., op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. B. Otto et al., B. Funk, P. Niemeyer, L. Xie (eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), 2018, pp. 314–325 op. cit. }

    Google Scholar 

  51. H. Richter, P.R. Slowinski, op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. B. Otto et al., B. Funk, P. Niemeyer, L. Xie (eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), 2018, pp. 314–325 op. cit. }

    Google Scholar 

  53. B. Benders et al., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Richter, P.R. Slowinski, op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering ISST, Emil-Figge-Str. 91, 44227, Dortmund, Germany

    Markus Spiekermann

Authors
  1. Markus Spiekermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Spiekermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spiekermann, M. Data Marketplaces: Trends and Monetisation of Data Goods. Intereconomics 54, 208–216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z