Skip to main content
Log in

Non-functional properties in the model-driven development of service-oriented systems

  • Theme Section
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systems based on the service-oriented architecture (SOA) principles have become an important cornerstone of the development of enterprise-scale software applications. They are characterized by separating functions into distinct software units, called services, which can be published, requested and dynamically combined in the production of business applications. Service-oriented systems (SOSs) promise high flexibility, improved maintainability, and simple re-use of functionality. Achieving these properties requires an understanding not only of the individual artifacts of the system but also their integration. In this context, non-functional aspects play an important role and should be analyzed and modeled as early as possible in the development cycle. In this paper, we discuss modeling of non-functional aspects of service-oriented systems, and the use of these models for analysis and deployment. Our contribution in this paper is threefold. First, we show how services and service compositions may be modeled in UML by using a profile for SOA (UML4SOA) and how non-functional properties of service-oriented systems can be represented using the non-functional extension of UML4SOA (UML4SOA-NFP) and the MARTE profile. This enables modeling of performance, security and reliable messaging. Second, we discuss formal analysis of models which respect this design, in particular we consider performance estimates and reliability analysis using the stochastically timed process algebra PEPA as the underlying analytical engine. Last but not least, our models are the source for the application of deployment mechanisms which comprise model-to-model and model-to-text transformations implemented in the framework VIATRA. All techniques presented in this work are illustrated by a running example from an eUniversity case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alwagait E., Ghandeharizadeh S.: DeW: a dependable web services framework. RIDE 01, 111–118 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amsden, J., Gardner, T., Griffin, C., Iyengar, S.: Draft UML 1.4 Profile for Automated Business Processes with a Mapping to BPEL 1.0. Specification, IBM. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/content/04April/3103/3103_UMLProfileForBusinessProcesses1.1.pdf (2003), Last visited: 10.12.2008

  3. Avizienis A., Laprie J.-C., Randell B., Landwehr C.: Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 1(1), 11–33 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balogh, A., Varró, D., Pataricza, A.: Model-based optimization of enterprise application and service deployment. In: ISAS, pp. 84–98, (2005)

  5. Balsamo S., Marco A.D., Inverardi P., Simeoni M.: Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(5), 295–310 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baresi L., Heckel R., Thöne S., Varró D.: Style-based modeling and refinement of service-oriented architectures. J. Softw. Syst. Model. (SOSYM) 5(2), 187–200 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernardi, S., Donatelli, S., Merseguer, J.: From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable Petri Net models. In: Inverardi, P., Balsamo, S., Selic, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software and Performance, pp.35–45. ACM, Rome, Italy, (2002)

  8. Börger E., Stärk R.: Abstract State Machines. A Method for High-Level System Design and Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Caceres, P., Marcos, E., Vera, B.: A MDA-based approach for web information system development. In: Workshop in Software Model Engineering (WiSME@UML2003) (2003)

  10. Canevet, C., Gilmore, S., Hillston, J., Kloul, L., Stevens, P.: Analysing UML 2.0 activity diagrams in the software performance engineering process. In: Dujmovic, J.J., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP 2004, Redwood Shores, California, USA, January 14–16, 2004, pp. 74–78 (2004)

  11. Cortellessa, V., Marco, A.D., Inverardi, P.: Software performance model-driven architecture. In: SAC ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 1218–1223. ACM Press, New York (2006)

  12. D’Ambrogio A., Bocciarelli P.: A model-driven approach to describe and predict the performance of composite services. In: Cortellessa, V., Uchitel, S., Yankelevich, D. (eds) WOSP, pp. 78–89. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Dujmovic, J.J., Almeida, V.A.F., Lea, D. (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP 2004, Redwood Shores, California, USA, January 14–16, 2004. ACM, New York (2004)

  14. Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds): Handbook on Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, volume 2: Applications, Languages and Tools. World Scientific, Singapore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ermagan, V., Krüger, I.: A UML2 profile for service modeling. In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. LNCS, vol. 4735, IEEE, pp. 360–374. Springer, Berlin (2007)

  16. Foster, H., Göczy, L., Koch, N., Mayer, P., Montangero, C., Varró, D.: D1.4b: UML for Service-Oriented Systems. Specification, SENSORIA Project 016004 (2010)

  17. Gönczy, L., Ávéd, J., Varró, D.: Model-based deployment of web services to standards-compliant middleware. In: Isaias, P., Nunes, M.B., Martinez, I. (eds.) Proceedings of WWW/Internet 2006(ICWI2006). Iadis Press (2006)

  18. Gönczy, L., Déri, Z., Varró, D.: Model-Based Performability Analysis of Service Configurations with Reliable Messaging. In: Koch, N., Vallecillo, A., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Model Driven Web Engineering (MDWE), CEUR, vol. 389 (2008)

  19. Grø nmo, R., Skogan, D., Solheim, I., Oldevik, J.: Model-Driven Web Services Development. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE’04), pp. 42–45. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2004)

  20. Gronmo, R., Skogan, D., Solheim, I., Oldevik, J.: Style-based modeling and refinement of service-oriented architectures. In: Eighth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC’04), IEEE, pp. 47–57. IEEE (2004)

  21. Hillston J.: A Compositional Approach to Performance Modelling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, S.: UML 2.0 Profile for Software Services. Specification, IBM (2005) http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/05/419_soa, Last visited: 10.12.2008

  23. Jonkers, H., Iacob, M.-E., Lankhorst, M.M., Strating, P.: Integration and Analysis of Functional and Non-Functional Aspects in Model-Driven E-Service Development. In: EDOC, pp. 229–238 (2005)

  24. Kelly S., Tolvanen J.-P.: Domain-Specific Modeling. Wiley- Interscience, IEEE Computer Society, USA (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, P., Chen, Y., Romanovsky, A.: Measuring the Dependability of Web Services for Use in e-Science Experiments. In: Penkler, D., Reitenspieß, M., Tam, F. (eds.) Service Availability, Third International Service Availability Symposium, ISAS 2006, Helsinki, Finland, May 15–16, 2006, Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4328, pp. 193–205. Springer, Berlin (2006)

  26. Looker, N., Xu, J.: Dependability assessment of grid middleware. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, DSN 2007, 25–28 June 2007, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 125–130. IEEE Computer Society, USA (2007)

  27. López-Grao, J.P., Merseguer, J., Campos, J.: From UML Activity Diagrams to Stochastic Petri Nets: Application to Software Performance Engineering. In Dujmovic, J.J., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP 2004, Redwood Shores, California, USA, January 14-16, 2004, pp. 25–36 (2004)

  28. Mantell, K.: From UML to BPEL. Specification, IBM. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-uml2bpel/ (2005). Last visited: 10.12.2008

  29. Mayer P., Schroeder A., Koch N.: A model-driven approach to service orchestration. In: SCC’08, IEEE, pp. 1–6. IEEE, USA (2008)

  30. Mayer, P., Schroeder, A., Koch, N.: MDD4SOA: model-driven service orchestration. In: The 12th IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2008), pp. 203–212. IEEE Computer Society, Munich, Germany (2008)

  31. Merseguer, J., Bernardi, S., Campos, J., Donatelli, S.: A compositional semantics for UML state machines aimed at performance evaluation. In: Silva, M., Giua, A., Colom, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems, pp. 295–302. IEEE Computer Society Press, Zaragoza, Spain (2002)

  32. Object Management Group: UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time Specification. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/schedulability.htm (2005)

  33. Object Management Group: UML for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms, v1.1. http://www.omg.org/spec/QFTP/1.1/ (2008)

  34. Object Management Group (OMG). Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure, version 2.1.2. Specification, OMG. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/07-11-02.pdf (2007)

  35. Object Management Group (OMG): UML Profile for MARTE, Beta 2. Specification, OMG. http://www.omgmarte.org/Documents/Specifications/08-06-09.pdf (2008)

  36. Object Management Group (OMG). Service Oriented Architecture Modeling Language (SoaML)—Specification for the UML Profile and Metamodel for Services (UPMS), revised submission. Specification, OMG. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/09-04-01 (2009). Last visited: 30.08.2009

  37. Petriu D., Woodside C.: An intermediate metamodel with scenarios and resources for generating performance models from UML designs. Softw. Syst. Model. 6, 163–184 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Röttger, S., Zschaler, S.: Model-driven development for non-functional properties: refinement through model transformation. In: Proceedings of the Unified Modeling Language (UML 2004). LNCS, vol. 3273, pp. 275–289. Springer, Berlin (2004)

  39. Software Engineering for Service-Oriented Overlay Computers. http://www.sensoria-ist.eu

  40. Tribastone M., Gilmore, S.: Automatic extraction of PEPA performance models from UML activity diagrams annotated with the MARTE profile. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP). ACM, Princeton, New Jersey, USA (2008)

  41. Vara, J.M., de Castro, V., Marcos, E.: WSDL automatic generation from UML models in a MDA framework. In: NWESP 2005, pp. 319. IEEE, USA (2005)

  42. Varró D., Balogh A.: The model transformation language of the VIATRA2 framework. Sci. Comput. Program. 68(3), 214–234 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Varró, D., Pataricza, A.: Generic and meta-transformations for model transformation engineering. In: Baar, T., Strohmeier, A., Moreira, A., Mellor, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the UML 2004: 7th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language. LNCS, vol. 3273, pp. 290–304. Springer, Lisbon (2004)

  44. Wada, H., Suzuki, J., Oba, K.: Modeling non-functional aspects in service oriented architecture. In: IEEE International Conference on Service Computing, Chicago, IL, pp. 222–229. IEEE, USA (2006)

  45. Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.1 (WS-Security 2004). http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/v1.1/

  46. Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Acciai, L., Clark, A., Banti, F. Fantechi, A., Gilmore, S., Gnesi, S., Gönczy, L., Koch, N., Lapadula, A., Mayer, P., Mazzanti, F., Pugliese, R., Schroeder, A., Tiezzi, F., Tribastone, M., Varró, D.: A pattern-based approach to augmenting service engineering with formal analysis, transformation and dynamicity. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (ISOLA 2008), Porto Sani, Greece, LNCS. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  47. Woodside, C.M., Petriu, D.C., Petriu, D.B., Shen, H., Israr, T., Meseguer, J.: Performance by unified model analysis (PUMA). In: WOSP, pp. 1–12. ACM, New York (2005)

  48. WS-Reliability 1.1 specification. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/ws-reliability/v1.1/wsrm-ws_reliability-1.1-spec-os.pdf

  49. WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 specification. http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-os-01.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora Koch.

Additional information

Communicated by Marko Boškovic, Bernhard Schätz, Claus Pahl, and Dragan Gasevic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilmore, S., Gönczy, L., Koch, N. et al. Non-functional properties in the model-driven development of service-oriented systems. Softw Syst Model 10, 287–311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0155-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0155-y

Keywords