Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A chaotic optimization method based on logistic-sine map for numerical function optimization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms have been used to solve mathematically unidentifiable problems. The main purpose of the optimization methods on problem-solving is to choose the best solution in predefined conditions. To increase performance of the optimization methods, chaotic maps for instance Logistic, Singer, Sine, Tent, Chebyshev, Circle have been widely used in the literature. However, hybrid 1D chaotic maps have higher performance than the 1D chaotic maps. The hybrid chaotic maps have not been used in the optimization process. In this article, 1D hybrid chaotic map (logistic-sine map)-based novel swarm optimization method is proposed to achieve higher numerical results than other optimization methods. Logistic-sine map has good statistical result, and this advantage is used directly to calculate global optimum value in this study. The proposed algorithm is a swarm-based optimization algorithm, and the seed value of the logistic-sine map is generated from local best solutions to reach global optimum. In order to test the proposed hybrid chaotic map-based optimization method, widely used numerical benchmark functions are chosen. The proposed chaotic optimization method is also tested on compression spring design problem. Results and comparisons clearly show that the proposed chaotic optimization method is successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Deuri J, Sathya SS (2018) Cricket chirping algorithm: an efficient meta-heuristic for numerical function optimisation. Int J Comput Sci Eng 16(2):162–172

    Google Scholar 

  2. Canayaz M, Karcı A (2015) Investigation of cricket behaviours as evolutionary computation for system design optimization problems. Measurement 68:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Özkaynak F (2015) A novel method to improve the performance of chaos based evolutionary algorithms. Optik 126(24):5434–5438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doğan Ş (2016) A new data hiding method based on chaos embedded genetic algorithm for color image. Artif Intell Rev 46(1):129–143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozmen Koca G, Dogan S, Yilmaz H (2018) A multi-objective route planning model based on genetic algorithm for cuboid surfaces. Automatika 59(1):120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niu J, Zhong W, Liang Y, Luo N, Qian F (2015) Fruit fly optimization algorithm based on differential evolution and its application on gasification process operation optimization. Knowl Based Syst 88:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorigo M, Birattari M (2010) Ant colony optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim 39(3):459–471

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang X-S, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. In: 2009 world congress on nature and biologically ınspired computing (NaBIC). IEEE, pp 210–214

  11. Yang X-S (2010) Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. Preprint arXiv:10031409

  12. Yang X-S (2010) A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO 2010). Springer, pp 65–74

  13. Chu S-C, Tsai P-W, Pan J-S (2006) Cat swarm optimization. In: Pacific Rim international conference on artificial intelligence. Springer, pp 854–858

  14. He S, Wu QH, Saunders J (2009) Group search optimizer: an optimization algorithm inspired by animal searching behavior. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(5):973–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Akyol S, Alatas B (2017) Plant intelligence based metaheuristic optimization algorithms. Artif Intell Rev 47(4):417–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boschetti MA, Maniezzo V, Roffilli M, Röhler AB (2009) Matheuristics: optimization, simulation and control. In: International workshop on hybrid metaheuristics. Springer, pp 171–177

  17. Ozbay F, Alatas B (2016) Review of musics based computational intelligence algorithms. In: 1st international conference on engineering technology and applied sciences. Afyon Kocatepe University, pp 663–669

  18. Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl Based Syst 96:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Demir FB, Tuncer T, Kocamaz AF (2019) Lojistik-Gauss Harita Tabanlı Yeni Bir Kaotik Sürü Optimizasyon Yöntemi. Anatolian Science-Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi 4:47–53

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arora S, Anand P (2019) Chaotic grasshopper optimization algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 31(8):4385–4405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Altay EV, Alatas B (2019) Bird swarm algorithms with chaotic mapping. Artif Intell Rev 53:1373–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pourmousa N, Ebrahimi SM, Malekzadeh M, Alizadeh M (2019) Parameter estimation of photovoltaic cells using improved Lozi map based chaotic optimization algorithm. Sol Energy 180:180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elaziz MA, Mirjalili S (2019) A hyper-heuristic for improving the initial population of whale optimization algorithm. Knowl Based Syst 172:42–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu H, Zhao N, Wang P, Chen H, Li C (2019) Chaos-enhanced synchronized bat optimizer. Appl Math Model 77:1201–1215

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sayed GI, Hassanien AE, Azar AT (2019) Feature selection via a novel chaotic crow search algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 31(1):171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo Y, Yu J, Lai W, Liu L (2019) A novel chaotic image encryption algorithm based on improved baker map and logistic map. Multimed Tools Appl 78:22023–22043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu S, Wang G, Zhu C (2019) A secure and fast image encryption scheme based on double chaotic s-boxes. Entropy 21(8):790

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan S, Wei J, Hu S (2019) A novel image encryption algorithm based on hybrid chaotic mapping and intelligent learning in financial security system. Multimed Tools Appl https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7144-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anter AM, Zhang Z (2019) Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy inference system-based chaotic swarm intelligence hybrid model for recognition of mild cognitive impairment from resting-state fMRI. In: International workshop on predictive intelligence in medicine. Springer, pp 23–33

  30. Fuertes G, Vargas M, Alfaro M, Soto-Garrido R, Sabattin J, Peralta MA (2019) Chaotic genetic algorithm and the effects of entropy in performance optimization. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 29(1):013132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun Y, Gao Y, Shi X (2019) Chaotic multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm incorporating clone immunity. Mathematics 7(2):146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hua Z, Jin F, Xu B, Huang H (2018) 2D logistic-sine-coupling map for image encryption. Sig Process 149:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hua Z, Zhou Y, Pun C-M, Chen CP (2015) 2D sine logistic modulation map for image encryption. Inf Sci 297:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu G, Kwong S (2010) Gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization. Appl Math Comput 217(7):3166–3173

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang H, Zhu Y, Chen H (2014) Root growth model: a novel approach to numerical function optimization and simulation of plant root system. Soft Comput 18(3):521–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kang F, Li J, Ma Z (2011) Rosenbrock artificial bee colony algorithm for accurate global optimization of numerical functions. Inf Sci 181(16):3508–3531

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Gordon VS, Whitley D (1993) Serial and parallel genetic algorithms as function optimizers. In: ICGA, pp 177–183

  38. Potter MA, De Jong KA (1994) A cooperative coevolutionary approach to function optimization. In: International conference on parallel problem solving from nature. Springer, pp 249–257

  39. Das S, Konar A, Chakraborty UK (2005) Improved differential evolution algorithms for handling noisy optimization problems. In: 2005 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, pp 1691–1698

  40. Mirjalili S, Wang G-G, Coelho LDS (2014) Binary optimization using hybrid particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 25(6):1423–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK, Mirjalili S (2019) An improved heat transfer search algorithm for unconstrained optimization problems. J Comput Des Eng 6(1):13–32

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl Based Syst 89:228–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Saremi S, Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2017) Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application. Adv Eng Softw 105:30–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Hatamlou A (2016) Multi-verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 27(2):495–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Al-Madi N, Faris H, Mirjalili S (2019) Binary multi-verse optimization algorithm for global optimization and discrete problems. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10:3445–3465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen K, Zhou F, Liu A (2018) Chaotic dynamic weight particle swarm optimization for numerical function optimization. Knowl Based Syst 139:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jaberipour M, Khorram E (2010) Two improved harmony search algorithms for solving engineering optimization problems. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 15(11):3316–3331

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Li MD, Zhao H, Weng XW, Han T (2016) A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: virus colony search. Adv Eng Softw 92:65–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Technologies, Doğanşehir Vahap Küçük Vocational School, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey

    Fahrettin Burak Demir

  2. Department of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey

    Türker Tuncer

  3. Department of Computer Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey

    Adnan Fatih Kocamaz

Authors
  1. Fahrettin Burak Demir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Türker Tuncer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adnan Fatih Kocamaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahrettin Burak Demir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, F.B., Tuncer, T. & Kocamaz, A.F. A chaotic optimization method based on logistic-sine map for numerical function optimization. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 14227–14239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04815-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04815-9

Keywords