Skip to main content
Log in

Complexity of Near-3-Choosability Problem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Graphs and Combinatorics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is currently an unsolved problem to determine whether, for every 2-list assignment L of a \(\triangle \)-free planar graph G, there exists an independent set \(A_L\) such that \(G[V_G{\setminus } A_L]\) is L-colorable. However, in this paper, we take a slightly different approach to the above problem. We prove the \({\mathbb {N}}{\mathbb {P}}\)-completeness of the decision problem of determining an independent set A such that \(G[V_G{\setminus } A]\) is 2-choosable for \(\triangle \)-free, 4-colorable graphs of diameter 3. Building upon this notion, we examine the computational complexity of two optimization problems: minimum near-3-choosability and minimum 2-choosable-edge-deletion. In the former problem, the goal is to find an independent set A of minimum size in a given graph G, such that the induced subgraph \(G[V_G {\setminus } A]\) is 2-choosable. We establish that this problem is \({\mathbb {N}}{\mathbb {P}}\)-hard to approximate within a factor of \(|V_G|^{1-\epsilon }\) for any \(\epsilon > 0\), for planar bipartite graphs of arbitrary large girth. On the other hand, the problem of minimum 2-choosable-edge-deletion involves determining an edge set \(F \subseteq E_G\) of minimum cardinality such that the spanning subgraph \(G[E_G {\setminus } F]\) is 2-choosable. We prove that this problem can be approximated within a factor of \(O(\log |V_G|)\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erdos, P., Rubin, A.L., Taylor, H.: Choosability in graphs. In: Proceedings West Coast Conf. on Combinatorics. Graph Theory and Computing, Congressus Numerantium, vol. 26, pp. 125–157 (1979)

  2. Choi, H., Kwon, Y.: On t-common list-colorings. Electron. J. Combin. (2017). https://doi.org/10.37236/6738

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu, X.: A refinement of choosability of graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctb.2019.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grotzsch, H.: Ein dreifarbensatz fur dreikreisfreie netze auf der kugel. Wiss. Z. Martin Luther Univ. Halle-Wittenberg Math. Nat. Reihe. 8, 109–120 (1959)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Voigt, M.: A not 3-choosable planar graph without 3-cycles. Discrete Math. 146(1), 325–328 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(94)00180-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gutner, S.: The complexity of planar graph choosability. Discrete Math. 159(1), 119–130 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(95)00104-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Glebov, A.N., Kostochka, A.V., Tashkinov, V.A.: Smaller planar triangle-free graphs that are not 3-list-colorable. Discrete Math. 290(2), 269–274 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2004.10.015

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Golovach, P.A., Johnson, M., Paulusma, D., Song, J.: A survey on the computational complexity of coloring graphs with forbidden subgraphs. J. Graph Theory 84(4), 331–363 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrugia, A.: Vertex-partitioning into fixed additive induced-hereditary properties is NP-hard. Electron. J. Combin. 11(1), 46–9 (2004). https://doi.org/10.37236/1799

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonamy, M., Dabrowski, K.K., Feghali, C., Johnson, M., Paulusma, D.: Independent feedback vertex sets for graphs of bounded diameter. Inform. Process. Lett. 131, 26–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2017.11.004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, A., Yuan, J.: Partition the vertices of a graph into one independent set and one acyclic set. Discrete Math. 306(12), 1207–1216 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2005.09.016

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamura, Y., Ito, T., Zhou, X.: Minimization and parameterized variants of vertex partition problems on graphs. In: Cao, Y., Cheng, S.-W., Li, M. (eds.) 31st International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), vol. 181, pp. 40–14013. Schloss Dagstuhl—Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany (2020). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2020.40. https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2020.40

  13. Bar-Yehuda, R., Geiger, D., Naor, J., Roth, R.M.: Approximation algorithms for the feedback vertex set problem with applications to constraint satisfaction and Bayesian inference. SIAM J. Comput. 27(4), 942–959 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Alon, N., Shapira, A., Sudakov, B.: Additive approximation for edge-deletion problems. Ann. Math. 170(1), 371–411 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability, vol. 174. Freeman, San Francisco (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lichtenstein, D.: Planar formulae and their uses. SIAM J. Comput. 11(2), 329–343 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Os, P.E., Pósa, L.: On the maximal number of disjoint circuits of a graph. Publ Math Debrecen 1, 1 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the anonymous referee for their valuable comments and insightful suggestions that led to significant improvement in the quality and presentation of the article, especially in the development of Proposition 10. We also thank Xuding Zhu for the feedback on the initial manuscript.

Funding

The research described in this paper received support from the HTRA fellowship of IIT Madras, which was endowed to Rohini S. and Sagar S. Sawant. Rohini S. would like to express her appreciation for the Women-Leading-IITM awardship. S. Mishra would like to thank SERB for the Grant under MATRICS (MTR/2023/000364).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sounaka Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S., Rohini, S. & Sawant, S.S. Complexity of Near-3-Choosability Problem. Graphs and Combinatorics 40, 104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-024-02837-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-024-02837-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification