Skip to main content

Validating Timed Models of Deployment Components with Parametric Concurrency

  • Conference paper
Formal Verification of Object-Oriented Software (FoVeOOS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6528))

Abstract

Many software systems today are designed without assuming a fixed underlying architecture, and may be adapted for sequential, multicore, or distributed deployment. Examples of such systems are found in, e.g., software product lines, service-oriented computing, information systems, embedded systems, operating systems, and telephony. Models of such systems need to capture and range over relevant deployment scenarios, so it is interesting to lift aspects of low-level deployment concerns to the abstraction level of the modeling language. This paper proposes an abstract model of deployment components for concurrent objects, extending the Creol modeling language. The deployment components are parametric in the amount of concurrency they provide; i.e., they vary in processing resources. We give a formal semantics of deployment components and characterize equivalence between deployment components which differ in concurrent resources in terms of test suites. Our semantics is executable on Maude, which allows simulations and test suites to be applied to a deployment component with different concurrent resources.

Partly funded by the EU project FP7-231620 HATS: Highly Adaptable and Trustworthy Software using Formal Models (http://www.hats-project.eu).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agha, G.A.: ACTORS: A Model of Concurrent Computations in Distributed Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahrendt, W., Dylla, M.: A system for compositional verification of asynchronous objects. Science of Computer Programming (2010) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albert, E., Arenas, P., Genaim, S., Puebla, G., Zanardini, D.: COSTA: Design and implementation of a cost and termination analyzer for java bytecode. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2007. LNCS, vol. 5382, pp. 113–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, J.: Programming Erlang: Software for a Concurrent World. Pragmatic Bookshelf (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balsamo, S., Marco, A.D., Inverardi, P., Simeoni, M.: Model-based performance prediction in software development: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(5), 295–310 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bjørk, J., Johnsen, E.B., Owe, O., Schlatte, R.: Lightweight time modeling in Timed Creol. In: Electronic Proc. in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 36, pp. 67–81 (2010); Proc. Intl. Workshop on Rewriting Techniques for Real-Time Systems (RTRTS 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caromel, D., Henrio, L.: A Theory of Distributed Object. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chakrabarti, A., de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Stoelinga, M.: Resource interfaces. In: Alur, R., Lee, I. (eds.) EMSOFT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2855, pp. 117–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, X., Hsieh, H., Balarin, F.: Verification approach of Metropolis design framework for embedded systems. Intl. J. of Parallel Prog. 34(1), 3–27 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Quesada, J.F.: Maude: Specification and programming in rewriting logic. Theoretical Computer Science 285, 187–243 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. de Boer, F.S., Clarke, D., Johnsen, E.B.: A complete guide to the future. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 316–330. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Epifani, I., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R., Tamburrelli, G.: Model evolution by run-time parameter adaptation. In: Proc. ICSE 2009, pp. 111–121. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fersman, E., Krcál, P., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: Task automata: Schedulability, decidability and undecidability. Inf. and Comp. 205(8), 1149–1172 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Haller, P., Odersky, M.: Scala actors: Unifying thread-based and event-based programming. Theoretical Computer Science 410(2-3), 202–220 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hennessy, M., Riely, J.: Information flow vs. resource access in the asynchronous pi-calculus. ACM TOPLAS 24(5), 566–591 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hessel, A., Larsen, K.G., Mikucionis, M., Nielsen, B., Pettersson, P., Skou, A.: Testing real-time systems using UPPAAL. In: Hierons, R.M., Bowen, J.P., Harman, M. (eds.) FORTEST. LNCS, vol. 4949, pp. 77–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hierons, R.M., Bogdanov, K., Bowen, J.P., Cleaveland, R., Derrick, J., Dick, J., Gheorghe, M., Harman, M., Kapoor, K., Krause, P., Lüttgen, G., Simons, A.J.H., Vilkomir, S.A., Woodward, M.R., Zedan, H.: Using formal specifications to support testing. ACM Computing Surveys 41(2) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jaghoori, M.M., de Boer, F.S., Chothia, T., Sirjani, M.: Schedulability of asynchronous real-time concurrent objects. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 78(5), 402–416 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnsen, E.B., Owe, O.: An asynchronous communication model for distributed concurrent objects. Software and Systems Modeling 6(1), 35–58 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnsen, E.B., Owe, O., Schlatte, R., Tapia Tarifa, S.L.: Dynamic resource reallocation between deployment components. In: Zhu, H. (ed.) ICFEM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6447, pp. 646–661. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meseguer, J.: Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science 96, 73–155 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ölveczky, P.C., Meseguer, J.: Abstraction and completeness for Real-Time Maude. In: Proc. WRLA. ENTCS, vol. 176, pp. 5–27. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Petriu, D.B., Woodside, C.M.: An intermediate metamodel with scenarios and resources for generating performance models from UML designs. Software and System Modeling 6(2), 163–184 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Plotkin, G.D.: A structural approach to operational semantics. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 61, 17–139 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., Van Der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Schäfer, J., Poetzsch-Heffter, A.: JCoBox: Generalizing active objects to concurrent components. In: D’Hondt, T. (ed.) ECOOP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6183, pp. 275–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Verhoef, M., Larsen, P.G., Hooman, J.: Modeling and validating distributed embedded real-time systems with VDM++. In: Misra, J., Nipkow, T., Karakostas, G. (eds.) FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4085, pp. 147–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Welc, A., Jagannathan, S., Hosking, A.: Safe futures for Java. In: Proc. OOPSLA 2005, pp. 439–453. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yacoub, S.M.: Performance analysis of component-based applications. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 299–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Broch Johnsen, E., Owe, O., Schlatte, R., Tapia Tarifa, S.L. (2011). Validating Timed Models of Deployment Components with Parametric Concurrency. In: Beckert, B., Marché, C. (eds) Formal Verification of Object-Oriented Software. FoVeOOS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6528. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18070-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18070-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18069-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18070-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics