Skip to main content

Comparative Evaluation of Classical Methods, Optimized Gabor Filters and LBP for Texture Feature Selection and Classification

  • Conference paper
Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns (CAIP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4673))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1943 Accesses

Abstract

This paper builds upon a previous texture feature selection and classification methodology by extending it with two state-of-the-art fami lies of texture feature extraction methods, namely Manjunath & Ma’s Gabor wavelet filters and Local Binary Pattern operators (LBP), which are integrated with more classical families of texture filters, such as co-occur rence matrices, Laws filters and wavelet transforms. Results with Brodatz compositions and outdoor images are evaluated and discussed, being the basis for a comparative study about the discrimination capabilities of those different families of texture methods, which have been traditionally applied on their own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manjunath, B.S., Ma, W.Y.: Texture Features for Browsing and Image Retrieval. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 18(8), 837–842 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Maenpaa, T.: Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(7), 971–987 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia, M.A., Puig, D.: Supervised Texture Classification by Integration of Multiple Texture Methods and Evaluation Windows. Image Vis. Comput. 25(7), 1091–1106 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puig, D., Garcia, M.A.: Automatic Texture Feature Selection for Image Pixel Classification. Pattern Recogn. 39(11), 1996–2009 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodatz, P.: Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers. Dover & Gree Publishing Company, Mineola, NY (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Randen, T., Husoy, J.H.: Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 21(4), 291–310 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, L., Lu, G., Zhang, D.: Effects of Different Gabor Filter Parameters on Image Retrieval by Texture. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. MMM 2004, pp. 273–278 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manjunath, B.S., et al.: Color and Texture Descriptors. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Tech. 11, 703–715 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Walter G. Kropatsch Martin Kampel Allan Hanbury

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Melendez, J., Puig, D., Garcia, M.A. (2007). Comparative Evaluation of Classical Methods, Optimized Gabor Filters and LBP for Texture Feature Selection and Classification. In: Kropatsch, W.G., Kampel, M., Hanbury, A. (eds) Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. CAIP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4673. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74272-2_113

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74272-2_113

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74271-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74272-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics