Skip to main content

Policies, Rules and Their Engines: What do They Mean for SLAs?

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3213))

  • 763 Accesses

Abstract

In our model for autonomic management of service level agreements (SLA), the roles played by policy and rules must be clearly differentiated. Although policy is typically an ideal we wish to achieve through the implementation of rules, the use of the terms policy and rule are often treated similarly and that consequently policy-engine and rule-engine are often used synonymously. It is our position that in the management of SLAs these terms have specific meanings. The definitions and models embodied are illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertino, E., et al.: UCS-Router: a Policy Engine for Enforcing Message Routing Rules in a Universal Communication System. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mobile Data Management (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buco, M., Chang, R., Luan, L., Ward, C., Wolf, J., Yu, P.: Managing eBusiness on demand SLA contracts in business terms using the cross-SLA execution manager SAM. In: Sixth International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, ISADS 2003, pp. 157–164 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. CIO.com. IBM’s New Hook, CIO Magazine (July 1, 2003) http://www.cio.com/archive

  4. Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E., Sloman, M.: The Ponder Specification Language. In: Sloman, M., Lobo, J., Lupu, E.C. (eds.) POLICY 2001. LNCS, vol. 1995, pp. 18–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lutfiyya, H., Molenkamp, G., Katchabaw, M., Bauer, M.: Issues in Managing Soft QoS requirements in Distributed Systems Using a Policy-Based Framework. In: International Workshop on Policies (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lupu, E.C., Sloman, M.: Conflicts in Policy-Based Distributed Systems Ma l.  25(6), 852–869 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. The PONDER Policy management, IEEE Trans. On Software Engineering, Vo Based Management Toolkit (August 2002), http://www-dse.doc.ic.ac.uk/

  8. Snir, Y., et al.: Policy QoS Information Model. Policy Working Group, IETF info-model-04.txt

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, Q., Zhou, Y., Perry, M.: Component Software and Policy-Driven Licensing Model. In: Proceedings of Policy 2003 -IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, B., Ellesson, E., Strassner, J., Westerinen, A.: Policy Core Information Model – Version 1 Specification. In: IETF RFC 3060 (February 2001), ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3460.txt

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Perry, M., Bauer, M. (2004). Policies, Rules and Their Engines: What do They Mean for SLAs?. In: Negoita, M.G., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3213. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30132-5_158

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30132-5_158

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23318-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30132-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics