Skip to main content

A Bayesian Network for Improving Organizational Regulations Effectiveness: Concurrent Modeling of Organizational Resilience Engineering and Macro-Ergonomics Indicators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 8))

  • 1414 Accesses

Abstract

This study presents a novel Bayesian Network (BN) based model for improving organizational regulations effectiveness (OREF) through concurrent modelling of organizational resilience engineering (ORE) and macro-ergonomics (ME) indicators in an organization. Six indicators namely teamwork, preparedness, fault tolerance, flexibility, redundancy and self-organization are considered as representatives of ORE. The macro-ergonomics indicators considered in this study are redesign, decision-making pace and information flow. The construction of the proposed model is composed of five steps. The BN is then used to track the status of OREF by considering ORE and ME indicators. Since these indicators represent the nodes of the Bayesian Network, in the first step they have been selected and confirmed by experts to be further considered in the model. The causal relationships between the nodes are acquired through aggregating experts’ opinions by using the Dempster-Shafer theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qureshi, Z.H.: A review of accident modelling approaches for complex socio-technical systems. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software and Safety-Related Programmable Systems, vol. 86. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. French, S., Cope, J.: A review of human factors identified in investigations by Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB). In: International Railway Safety Conference, London, UK (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., de Winter, J.C.: Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 32, 127–140 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Madigan, S., et al.: Representational and Questionnaire Measures of Attachment: A Meta-Analysis of Relations to Child Internalizing and Externalizing Problems. American Psychological Association (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azadeh, A., Zarrin, M.: An intelligent framework for productivity assessment and analysis of human resource from resilience engineering, motivational factors, HSE and ergonomics perspectives. Saf. Sci. 89, 55–71 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pęciłło, M.: The resilience engineering concept in enterprises with and without occupational safety and health management systems. Safety Sci. 82, 190–198 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollnagel, E., Resilience: The Challenge of the Unstable (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henry, D., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E.: Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 99, 114–122 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morel, G., Amalberti, R., Chauvin, C.: How good micro/macro ergonomics may improve resilience, but not necessarily safety. Saf. Sci. 47(2), 285–294 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Woods, D.D., Hollnagel, E.: Prologue: resilience engineering concepts. In: Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, pp. 1–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Azadeh, A., et al.: Assessment of resilience engineering factors in high-risk environments by fuzzy cognitive maps: a petrochemical plant. Saf. Sci. 68, 99–107 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nielsen, T.D., Jensen, F.V.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Neapolitan, R.E.: Learning Bayesian Networks, vol. 38. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Constantinou, A.C., et al.: From complex questionnaire and interviewing data to intelligent Bayesian network models for medical decision support. Artif. Intell. Med. 67, 75–93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Azadeh, A., et al.: An adaptive neural network algorithm for assessment and improvement of job satisfaction with respect to HSE and ergonomics program: the case of a gas refinery. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24(4), 361–370 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S., Sun, J.: Business Research Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Woodson, W.E., Tillman, B., Tillman, P.: Human Factors Design Handbook: Information and Guidelines for the Design of Systems, Facilities, Equipment, and Products for Human Use. McGraw-Hill, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu, S.H., et al.: The influence of organizational factors on safety in Taiwanese high-risk industries. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23(5), 646–653 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohammadfam, I., et al.: Constructing a Bayesian network model for improving safety behavior of employees at workplaces. Appl. Ergon. 58, 35–47 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Azadeh, A., et al.: An intelligent algorithm for performance evaluation of job stress and HSE factors in petrochemical plants with noise and uncertainty. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26(1), 140–152 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Azadeh, A., et al.: Improved prediction of mental workload versus HSE and ergonomics factors by an adaptive intelligent algorithm. Saf. Sci. 58, 59–75 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Azadeh, A., et al.: A neuro-fuzzy algorithm for assessment of health, safety, environment and ergonomics in a large petrochemical plant. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 34, 100–114 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Azadeh, A., et al.: Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis: the case of a petrochemical plant. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 92(3), 231–241 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Saberi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Azadeh, A., Partovi, M., Saberi, M., Chang, E., Hussain, O. (2018). A Bayesian Network for Improving Organizational Regulations Effectiveness: Concurrent Modeling of Organizational Resilience Engineering and Macro-Ergonomics Indicators. In: Barolli, L., Woungang, I., Hussain, O. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems. INCoS 2017. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65636-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65636-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65635-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65636-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics