Skip to main content

Doubles and Negatives are Positive (in Self-assembly)

  • Conference paper
Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation (UCNC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8553))

Abstract

In the abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM), the phenome-non of cooperation occurs when the attachment of a new tile to a growing assembly requires it to bind to more than one tile already in the assembly. Often referred to as “temperature-2” systems, those which employ cooperation are known to be quite powerful (i.e. they are computationally universal and can build an enormous variety of shapes and structures). Conversely, aTAM systems which do not enforce cooperative behavior, a.k.a. “temperature-1” systems, are conjectured to be relatively very weak, likely to be unable to perform complex computations or algorithmically direct the process of self-assembly. Nonetheless, a variety of models based on slight modifications to the aTAM have been developed in which temperature-1 systems are in fact capable of Turing universal computation through a restricted notion of cooperation. Despite that power, though, several of those models have previously been proven to be unable to perform or simulate the stronger form of cooperation exhibited by temperature-2 aTAM systems.

In this paper, we first prove that another model in which temperature-1 systems are computationally universal, namely the restricted glue TAM (rgTAM) in which tiles are allowed to have edges which exhibit repulsive forces, is also unable to simulate the strongly cooperative behavior of the temperature-2 aTAM. We then show that by combining the properties of two such models, the Dupled Tile Assembly Model (DTAM) and the rgTAM into the DrgTAM, we derive a model which is actually more powerful at temperature-1 than the aTAM at temperature-2. Specifically, the DrgTAM, at temperature-1, can simulate any aTAM system of any temperature, and it also contains systems which cannot be simulated by any system in the aTAM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook, M., Fu, Y., Schweller, R.T.: Temperature 1 self-assembly: Deterministic assembly in 3D and probabilistic assembly in 2D. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2011. SIAM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demaine, E.D., Patitz, M.J., Rogers, T.A., Schweller, R.T., Summers, S.M., Woods, D.: The two-handed assembly model is not intrinsically universal. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) ICALP 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7965, pp. 400–412. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Doty, D., Kari, L., Masson, B.: Negative interactions in irreversible self-assembly. Algorithmica 66(1), 153–172 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Doty, D., Lutz, J.H., Patitz, M.J., Schweller, R.T., Summers, S.M., Woods, D.: The tile assembly model is intrinsically universal. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2012, pp. 302–310 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doty, D., Patitz, M.J., Summers, S.M.: Limitations of self-assembly at temperature 1. Theoretical Computer Science 412, 145–158 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hendricks, J., Padilla, J.E., Patitz, M.J., Rogers, T.A.: Signal transmission across tile assemblies: 3d static tiles simulate active self-assembly by 2d signal-passing tiles. In: Soloveichik, D., Yurke, B. (eds.) DNA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8141, pp. 90–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hendricks, J., Patitz, M.J., Rogers, T.A.: Doubles and negatives are positive (in self-assembly). CoRR, abs/1403.3841 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hendricks, J., Patitz, M.J., Rogers, T.A., Summers, S.M.: The power of duples (in self-assembly): It’s not so hip to be square. In: Proceedings of 20th International Computing and Combinatorics Conference (COCOON 2014), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, August 4-6 (to appear, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lathrop, J.I., Lutz, J.H., Patitz, M.J., Summers, S.M.: Computability and complexity in self-assembly. Theory Comput. Syst. 48(3), 617–647 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Meunier, P.-E., Patitz, M.J., Summers, S.M., Theyssier, G., Winslow, A., Woods, D.: Intrinsic universality in tile self-assembly requires cooperation. In: Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2014), Portland, OR, USA, January 5-7, pp. 752–771 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Padilla, J.E., Patitz, M.J., Pena, R., Schweller, R.T., Seeman, N.C., Sheline, R., Summers, S.M., Zhong, X.: Asynchronous signal passing for tile self-assembly: Fuel efficient computation and efficient assembly of shapes. In: Mauri, G., Dennunzio, A., Manzoni, L., Porreca, A.E. (eds.) UCNC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7956, pp. 174–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Patitz, M.J., Schweller, R.T., Summers, S.M.: Exact shapes and turing universality at temperature 1 with a single negative glue. In: Cardelli, L., Shih, W. (eds.) DNA 17. LNCS, vol. 6937, pp. 175–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patitz, M.J., Summers, S.M.: Self-assembly of decidable sets. Natural Computing 10(2), 853–877 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Paul, W.K.: Rothemund and Erik Winfree. The program-size complexity of self-assembled squares (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 200, Portland, Oregon, United States, pp. 459–468. ACM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soloveichik, D., Winfree, E.: Complexity of self-assembled shapes. SIAM Journal on Computing 36(6), 1544–1569 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Winfree.: Algorithmic Self-Assembly of DNA. PhD thesis. California Institute of Technology (June 1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hendricks, J., Patitz, M.J., Rogers, T.A. (2014). Doubles and Negatives are Positive (in Self-assembly). In: Ibarra, O., Kari, L., Kopecki, S. (eds) Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation. UCNC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8553. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08123-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08123-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08122-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08123-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics