Abstract
Texts reveal the subjects of interest in research fields, and the values, beliefs, and practices of researchers. In this study, texts are examined through bibliometric mapping and topic modeling to provide a bird’s eye view of the social dynamics associated with the diffusion of research synthesis methods in the contexts of Social Work and Women’s Studies. Research synthesis texts are especially revealing because the methods, which include meta-analysis and systematic review, are reliant on the availability of past research and data, sometimes idealized as objective, egalitarian approaches to research evaluation, fundamentally tied to past research practices, and performed with the goal informing future research and practice. This study highlights the co-influence of past and subsequent research within research fields; illustrates dynamics of the diffusion process; and provides insight into the cultural contexts of research in Social Work and Women’s Studies. This study suggests the potential to further develop bibliometric mapping and topic modeling techniques to inform research problem selection and resource allocation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A.: Boundaries of Social Work or Social Work of boundaries? The Social Service Review Lecture. Soc. Serv. Rev. 69, 545–562 (1995)
Boxer, M.J.: For and about women: The theory and practice of Women’s Studies in the United States. Signs 7, 661–695 (1982)
Hedges, L.V.: How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. Am. Psychol. 42, 443–455 (1987)
Toews, L.: The information infrastructure that supports evidence-based veterinary medicine: A comparison with human medicine. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 38, 123–134 (2011)
Bastian, H., Glasziou, P., Chalmers, I.: Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Medicine 7, e1000326 (2010)
Sheble, L.: Appendices B and C (2013), http://laurasheble.web.unc.edu/dissertation/
Rafols, I., Porter, A.L., Leydesdorff, L.: Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 61, 1871–1887 (2010)
Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A.: Pajek. Program for Large Network Analysis. Connections 21, 47–57 (1998)
Stirling, A.: A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 707–719 (2007)
Rafols, I., Meyer, M.: Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics 82, 263–287 (2010)
Asuncion, A., Welling, M., Smyth, P., Teh, Y.W.: On smoothing and inference for topic models. In: Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2009), pp. 27–34. AUAI Press, Corvallis (2009)
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. 3, 993–1022 (2003)
Ramage, D., Rosen, E.: Stanford TMT (2011), http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tmt/
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: Open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2009)
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp., 10008 (2008)
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group: Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 268, 2420–2425 (1992)
Klein, J.T.: Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinaries. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville (1996)
Chalmers, I., Hedges, L.V., Cooper, H.: A brief history of research synthesis. Eval. Health Prof. 25, 12–37 (2002)
Anastas, J.W.: Research design for Social Work and the human services, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New York (2000)
Herie, M., Martin, G.W.: Knowledge diffusion in Social Work: A new approach to bridging the gap. Social Work 47, 85–95 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sheble, L., Chen, A.T. (2014). Contexts of Diffusion: Adoption of Research Synthesis in Social Work and Women’s Studies. In: Kennedy, W.G., Agarwal, N., Yang, S.J. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8393. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05579-4_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05579-4_43
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05578-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05579-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)