Skip to main content

Modelling Group Performance in Multiagent Systems: Introducing the CollabQuest Simulation Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS 2023)

Abstract

We present a novel model for studying group performance in collaborative multiagent teams. The model incorporates task interdependence and evaluation types as key factors influencing group dynamics. We propose a simulation game called CollabQuest, which will serve as a platform to explore the effects of these factors on collective performance within the context of collaborative project teams. The game involves agents collaborating to fill a common pool with a minimum amount of work within a limited number of turns, simulating a group work environment. By manipulating the composition of the group and the interdependence among agents, we plan to study how different types of tasks and evaluation approaches impact the behaviour and decision-making of agents. The model integrates intrinsic and extrinsic rewards, creating a tension between individual and collective interests, and reflecting real-world challenges. Through CollabQuest, we aim to gain insights into the challenges and strategies associated with multiagent systems in collaborative settings. This preliminary work lays the foundation for further research in the field of multiagent reinforcement learning and collective decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We exclude discretionary tasks from our model since the way contributions of team members are aggregated is not determined in their definition.

References

  1. Bolton, M.K.: The role of coaching in student teams: a “just-in-time’’ approach to learning. J. Manag. Educ. 23(3), 233 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J., Higgs, A.C.: Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups. Pers. Psychol. 46(4), 823–847 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jara-Ettinger, J., Gweon, H., Schulz, L.E., Tenenbaum, J.B.: The naïve utility calculus: computational principles underlying commonsense psychology. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20(8), 589–604 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: An educational psychology success story: social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educ. Res. 38(5), 365–379 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kameda, T., Stasson, M.F., Davis, J.H., Parks, C.D., Zimmerman, S.K.: Social dilemmas, subgroups, and motivation loss in task-oriented groups: in search of an “optimal’’ team size in division of work. Soc. Psychol. Q. 55, 47–56 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leibo, J.Z., Zambaldi, V., Lanctot, M., Marecki, J., Graepel, T.: Multi-agent reinforcement learning in sequential social dilemmas. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.03037 (2017)

  7. Nijstad, B.A.: Group Performance. Psychology Press, London (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Ostrom, V., Ostrom, E.: Public goods and public choices. In: Alternatives for Delivering Public Services, pp. 7–49. Routledge (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schein, E.H.: Organizational psychology then and now: some observations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2(1), 1–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steiner, I.D.: Group Process and Productivity. Academic Press, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, K.D., Karau, S.J.: Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61(4), 570–581 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandra López de Aberasturi-Gómez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

López de Aberasturi-Gómez, A., Sabater-Mir, J., Sierra, C. (2023). Modelling Group Performance in Multiagent Systems: Introducing the CollabQuest Simulation Game. In: Malvone, V., Murano, A. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14282. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43264-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43264-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43263-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43264-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics