Skip to main content

Apply Trust Computing and Privacy Preserving Smart Contracts to Manage, Share, and Analyze Multi-site Clinical Trial Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The International Conference on Deep Learning, Big Data and Blockchain (DBB 2022) (DBB 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 541))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 467 Accesses

Abstract

Multi-site clinical trial systems face security challenges when streamlining information sharing while protecting patient privacy. In addition, patient enrollment, transparency, traceability, data integrity, and reporting in clinical trial systems are all critical aspects of maintaining data compliance. A Blockchain-based clinical trial framework has been proposed by lots of researchers and industrial companies recently, but its limitations of lack of data governance, limited confidentiality, and high communication overhead made data-sharing systems insecure and not efficient.

We propose \(\textsf{Soteria}\), a privacy-preserving smart contracts framework, to manage, share and analyze clinical trial data on fabric private chaincode (FPC). Compared to public Blockchain, fabric has fewer participants with an efficient consensus protocol. \(\textsf{Soteria}\) consists of several modules: patient consent and clinical trial approval management chaincode, secure execution for confidential data sharing, API Gateway, and decentralized data governance with adaptive threshold signature (ATS). We implemented two versions of \(\textsf{Soteria}\) with non-SGX deploys on AWS blockchain and SGX-based on a local data center. We evaluated the response time for all of the access endpoints on AWS Managed Blockchain, and demonstrated the utilization of SGX-based smart contracts for data sharing and analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    An individual who conducts a clinical investigation.

  2. 2.

    Regulatory compliance is an organization’s adherence to laws, regulations, guidelines, and specifications relevant to its business processes.

  3. 3.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_but_verify.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-private-chaincode/tree/main/samples/demos/irb.

References

  1. Akiri. https://akiri.com/

  2. AWS Secret Manager. https://aws.amazon.com/secrets-manager/

  3. Burstiq. https://burstiq.com/

  4. Cognito. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cognito

  5. Factom. https://www.factomprotocol.org/

  6. grpc. https://grpc.io/

  7. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/informed-consent

  8. https://www.project-redcap.org/

  9. Iam policy. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/iam/latest/userguide/access.html

  10. Lambda. https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/

  11. Adere, E.M.: Blockchain in healthcare and IoT: a systematic literature review. Array 100139 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Androulaki, E., et al.: Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, pp. 1–15 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bates, D.W., Ebell, M., Gotlieb, E., Zapp, J., Mullins, H.: A proposal for electronic medical records in US primary care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(1), 1–10 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benchoufi, M., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P.: Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Research 6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brandenburger, M., Cachin, C., Kapitza, R., Sorniotti, A.: Blockchain and trusted computing: problems, pitfalls, and a solution for hyperledger fabric. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.08541 (2018)

  16. Duan, S., et al.: Intrusion-tolerant and confidentiality-preserving publish/subscribe messaging. In: 2020 International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), pp. 319–328. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dwivedi, A.D., Srivastava, G., Dhar, S., Singh, R.: A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT. Sensors 19(2), 326 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Genestier, P., et al.: Blockchain for consent management in the ehealth environment: a nugget for privacy and security challenges. J. Int. Soc. Telemed. eHealth 5, GKR-e24 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gilda, S., Mehrotra, M.: Blockchain for student data privacy and consent. In: 2018 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon, W.J., Catalini, C.: Blockchain technology for healthcare: facilitating the transition to patient-driven interoperability. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 16, 224–230 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaptchuk, G., Miers, I., Green, M.: Giving state to the stateless: augmenting trustworthy computation with ledgers. Cryptology ePrint Archive (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mamun, Q.: Blockchain technology in the future of healthcare. Smart Health 23, 100223 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mann, S.P., Savulescu, J., Ravaud, P., Benchoufi, M.: Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research. J. Med. Ethics 47(4), 244–250 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matetic, S., et al.: \(\{\)ROTE\(\}\): rollback protection for trusted execution. In: 26th \(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security Symposium (\(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security 17), pp. 1289–1306 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. McGhin, T., Choo, K.-K.R., Liu, C.Z., He, D.: Blockchain in healthcare applications: research challenges and opportunities. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 135, 62–75 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mettler, M.: Blockchain technology in healthcare: the revolution starts here. In: 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), pp. 1–3. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rantos, K., Drosatos, G., Demertzis, K., Ilioudis, C., Papanikolaou, A., Kritsas, A.: ADvoCATE: a consent management platform for personal data processing in the IoT using blockchain technology. In: Lanet, J.-L., Toma, C. (eds.) SECITC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11359, pp. 300–313. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12942-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Rupasinghe, T., Burstein, F., Rudolph, C.: Blockchain based dynamic patient consent: a privacy-preserving data acquisition architecture for clinical data analytics (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tith, D., et al.: Patient consent management by a purpose-based consent model for electronic health record based on blockchain technology. Healthc. Inform. Res. 26(4), 265–273 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, Y., Chen, H., Wang, X., Liu, C., Nguyen, P., Yesha, Y.: Tolerating adversarial attacks and byzantine faults in distributed machine learning. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 3380–3389. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the NSF through grant IIP-1919159. We also acknowledge the support of Andrew Weiss, and Mic Bowman from Intel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusen Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wu, Y., Liu, C., Sebald, L., Nguyen, P., Yesha, Y. (2023). Apply Trust Computing and Privacy Preserving Smart Contracts to Manage, Share, and Analyze Multi-site Clinical Trial Data. In: Awan, I., Younas, M., Bentahar, J., Benbernou, S. (eds) The International Conference on Deep Learning, Big Data and Blockchain (DBB 2022). DBB 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16035-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics