Skip to main content

Detecting and Explaining Usability Issues of Consumer Electronic Products

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 (INTERACT 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12935))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Usability of a consumer electronic product (CEP) is one of the most important factors that the users consider in purchasing a CEP as well as functionality, price, etc. This has led many companies to realize new shapes of user interfaces (UIs) and styles of interaction for CEPs, ranging from modern touchscreens to physical controls and displays of any kind. Even if the general feeling is that such increased interactivity may enhance the overall user experience, the side effect is that often a CEP’s UI provides too many functions that are difficult to learn and use without referring to the user manual, leading to many usability issues. In this paper, we leverage a case study in the CEPs sector to present a novel log-based evaluation technique in the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Our technique allows us not only to keep track of the user interactions with a CEP’s UI during its daily use, but also to understand what has gone wrong during a user interaction, detecting which user actions have caused usability issues and suggesting explanations for solving them, thus providing a crucial feedback to improve the design of the CEP’s UI next version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The case study is just an exploration of some possible design issues of a real oven’s UI. Since the authors are not affiliated in any way with the CEP company that manufactured the oven, the company name and the oven’s model are not disclosed.

  2. 2.

    The complete list of cooking functions provided by the microwave oven can be found in the user manual associated to the oven.

  3. 3.

    Users participating to remote tests are often rewarded with discounts, coupons, etc.

  4. 4.

    https://processing.org/.

  5. 5.

    cf. https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/news/consumer-electronics-market.

References

  1. Alan, D., Janet, F., Gregory, A., Russell, B.: Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, London (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Augusto, A., et al.: Automated discovery of process models from event logs: review and benchmark. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 31(4), 686–705 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastide, R., Palanque, P., Sy, O., Le, D.-H., Navarre, D.: Petri net based behavioural specification of CORBA systems. In: Donatelli, S., Kleijn, J. (eds.) ICATPN 1999. LNCS, vol. 1639, pp. 66–85. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48745-X_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Benyon, D.: Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design. Pearson, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campos, J.C., Sousa, M., Alves, M.C.B., Harrison, M.D.: Formal verification of a space system’s user interface with the IVY workbench. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 46(2), 303–316 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carmona, J., et al.: Conformance Checking. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99414-7

  7. Dignum, M.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, Founded in Logic. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dumais, S., Jeffries, R., Russell, D.M., Tang, D., Teevan, J.: Understanding user behavior through log data and analysis. In: Olson, J.S., Kellogg, W.A. (eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI, pp. 349–372. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Feary, M.S.: A toolset for supporting iterative human automation: interaction in design. NASA Ames Research Center. Tech. rep. 20100012861 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferre, X., Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M.: Improving software engineering practice with HCI aspects. In: Ramamoorthy, C.V., Lee, R., Lee, K.W. (eds.) SERA 2003. LNCS, vol. 3026, pp. 349–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferre, X., Villalba, E., Julio, H., Zhu, H.: Extending mobile app analytics for usability test logging. In: Bernhaupt, R., Dalvi, G., Joshi, A., K. Balkrishan, D., O’Neill, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2017, Part III. LNCS, vol. 10515, pp. 114–131. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67687-6_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu, B., Lin, J., Li, L., Faloutsos, C., Hong, J., Sadeh, N.: Why people hate your app: making sense of user feedback in a mobile app store. In: 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1276–1284 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Han, S.H., Yun, M.H., Kwahk, J., Hong, S.W.: Usability of consumer electronic products. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 28(3–4), 143–151 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harel, D.: Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci. Comput. Program. 8(3), 231–274 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartson, H.R., Andre, T.S., Williges, R.C.: Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 13(4), 373–410 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Humayoun, S.R., et al.: The WORKPAD user interface and methodology: developing smart and effective mobile applications for emergency operators. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009, Part III. LNCS, vol. 5616, pp. 343–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, R.P., van der Aalst, W.: Trace alignment in process mining: opportunities for process diagnostics. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) Business Process Management. BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 227–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15618-2_17

  18. Janlert, L.E., Stolterman, E.: Things that Keep us Busy: The Elements of Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. John, B.E., Kieras, D.E.: The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 3(4), 320–351 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joung, J., Jung, K., Ko, S., Kim, K.: Customer complaints analysis using text mining and outcome-driven innovation method for market-oriented product development. Sustainability 11(1), 1–14 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kao, C.K., Liebovitz, D.M.: Consumer mobile health apps: current state, barriers, and future directions. J. Am. Acad. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 9(5), 106–115 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, J., Han, S.H.: A methodology for developing a usability index of consumer electronic products. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38(3–4), 333–345 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B.: Was it worth the hassle?: ten years of mobile HCI research discussions on lab and field evaluations. In: 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI 2014), pp. 43–52. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van Kuijk, J., Christiaans, H., Kanis, H., van Eijk, D.: Usability in the development of consumer electronics: issues and actors. In: 16th World Congress on Ergonomics (IEA 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Kuijk, J., Kanis, H., Christiaans, H., van Eijk, D.: Barriers to and enablers of usability in electronic consumer product development: a multiple case study. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 32(1), 1–71 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kwahk, J., Han, S.H.: A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products. Appl. Ergon. 33(5), 419–431 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lau, T., Horvitz, E.: Patterns of search: analyzing and modeling web query refinement. In: Kay, J. (ed.) UM99 User Modeling. CICMS, vol. 407, pp. 119–128. Springer, Vienna (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2490-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. de Leoni, M., Marrella, A.: Aligning real process executions and prescriptive process models through automated planning. Expert Syst. Appl. 82, 162–183 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lettner, F., Holzmann, C.: Automated and unsupervised user interaction logging as basis for usability evaluation of mobile applications. In: 10th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (MoMM 2012), pp. 118–127. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marrella, A., Catarci, T.: Measuring the learnability of interactive systems using a petri net based approach. In: Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS 2018, pp. 1309–1319 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marrella, A., Ferro, L.S., Catarci, T.: An approach to identifying what has gone wrong in a user interaction. In: Lamas, D., Loizides, F., Nacke, L., Petrie, H., Winckler, M., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) INTERACT 2019, Part III. LNCS, vol. 11748, pp. 361–370. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Marrella, A., Mecella, M., Russo, A.: Collaboration on-the-field: suggestions and beyond. In: 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marrella, A., Mecella, M., Sardiña, S.: Supporting adaptiveness of cyber-physical processes through action-based formalisms. AI Commun. 31(1), 47–74 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Mori, G., Paternò, F., Santoro, C.: CTTE: support for developing and analyzing task models for interactive system design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(8), 797–813 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Murata, T.: Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc. IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nielsen, J.: Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1992), pp. 373–380 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nielsen, J.: 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Nielsen Norman Group (1994). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/

  38. Okada, H., Asahi, T.: Guitester: a log-based usability testing tool for graphical user interfaces. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 82(6), 1030–1041 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Page, T.: Skeuomorphism or flat design: future directions in mobile device User Interface (UI) design education. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ. 8(2), 130–142 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Palanque, P.A., Bastide, R.: Petri net based design of user-driven interfaces using the interactive cooperative objects formalism. In: Paternó, F. (ed.) Interactive Systems: Design, Specification, and Verification. Focus on Computer Graphics (Tutorials and Perspectives in Computer Graphics). Springer, Heidelberg (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87115-3_23

  41. Paterno, F.: Model-Based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0445-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: 18th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Supply & Demand Chain Executive: What Are Late Product Launches Really Costing You? (2017). https://www.sdcexec.com/sourcing-procurement/article/20985884/

  44. Sutcliffe, A.G., Wang, I.: Integrating human computer interaction with Jackson system development. Comput. J. 34(2), 132–142 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Thapliyal, H.: Internet of things-based consumer electronics: reviewing existing consumer electronic devices, systems, and platforms and exploring new research paradigms. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 7(1), 66–67 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tyler, S.K., Teevan, J.: Large scale query log analysis of re-finding. In: Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 191–200 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Valle, T., Prata, W., et al.: Automated usability tests for mobile devices through live emotions logging. In: 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI 2015), pp. 636–643. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Van Den Bos, J., Plasmeijer, M.J., Hartel, P.H.: Input-output tools: a language facility for interactive and real-time systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 9(3), 247–259 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wasserman, A.I.: Extending state transition diagrams for the specification of human-computer interaction. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 8, 699–713 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang, X., Qiao, Z., Tang, L., Fan, W., Fox, E., Wang, G.: Identifying product defects from user complaints: a probabilistic defect model. In: Decision Support and Analytics (SIGDSA 2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the “Dipartimento di Eccellenza” grant, the H2020 project DataCloud and the Sapienza grant BPbots.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Marrella .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Benvenuti, D., Buda, E., Fraioli, F., Marrella, A., Catarci, T. (2021). Detecting and Explaining Usability Issues of Consumer Electronic Products. In: Ardito, C., et al. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021. INTERACT 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12935. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85609-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85610-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics