Abstract
For the development of large-scale representations of knowledge, the application of methodologies and design principles becomes relevant. The knowledge may be organized in ontologies in a modular and hierarchical fashion. An upper-level (reference) ontology typically provides specifications of requirements, functions, design or standards that are to be complied with by domain ontologies for a specific task on a lower level (task ontology) in the hierarchy. Verifying whether and how specifications have been implemented by a task ontology becomes a challenge when relevant axioms of the domain ontology need to be inspected. We consider specifications to be defined using entailments of certain queries over a given vocabulary. For selecting the relevant axioms from task ontologies, we propose a novel module notion called projection module that entails the queries that follow from a reference ontology. We develop algorithms for computing minimal projection modules of Description Logic terminologies for subsumption, instance and conjunctive queries.
This work is partially funded by the ANR project GoAsQ (ANR-15-CE23-0022).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alsubait, T., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Measuring similarity in ontologies: a new family of measures. In: Janowicz, K., Schlobach, S., Lambrix, P., Hyvönen, E. (eds.) EKAW 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8876, pp. 13–25. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13704-9_2
Arif, M.F., Mencía, C., Ignatiev, A., Manthey, N., Peñaloza, R., Marques-Silva, J.: BEACON: an efficient SAT-based tool for debugging \({\cal{EL}}{^+}\) ontologies. In: Creignou, N., Le Berre, D. (eds.) SAT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9710, pp. 521–530. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40970-2_32
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2 edn. Cambridge University Press, June 2010
Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: An Introduction to Description Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)
Baader, F., Peñaloza, R., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Pinpointing in the description logic \(\cal{EL}\). In: Proceedings of DL 2007: The 20th International Workshop on Description Logics (2007)
Botoeva, E., Konev, B., Lutz, C., Ryzhikov, V., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Inseparability and conservative extensions of description logic ontologies: a survey. In: Pan, J.Z., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2016. LNCS, vol. 9885, pp. 27–89. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49493-7_2
Botoeva, E., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Games for query inseparability of description logic knowledge bases. Artif. Intell. 234, 78–119 (2016)
Botoeva, E., Lutz, C., Ryzhikov, V., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Query-based entailment and inseparability for ALC ontologies. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2016: The 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1001–1007. AAAI Press (2016)
Chen, J., Ludwig, M., Ma, Y., Walther, D.: Zooming in on ontologies: minimal modules and best excerpts. In: d’Amato, C., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10587, pp. 173–189. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68288-4_11
Chen, J., Ludwig, M., Walther, D.: Computing minimal subsumption modules of ontologies. In: Proceedings of GCAI 2018: The 4th Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 41–53 (2018)
Domingue, J., Anutariya, C. (eds.): ASWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5367. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89704-0
Ecke, A., Ludwig, M., Walther, D.: The concept difference for \(\cal{EL}\)-terminologies using hypergraphs. In: Proceedings of DChanges 2013: The International workshop on (Document) Changes: Modeling, Detection, Storage and Visualization (2013)
Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0
Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: Modular reuse of ontologies: theory and practice. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 31(1), 273–318 (2008)
Jung, J.C., Lutz, C., Martel, M., Schneider, T.: Query conservative extensions in horn description logics with inverse roles. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2017: The 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1116–1122. AAAI Press (2017)
Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Hendler, J.A.: Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies. J. Web Semant. 3(4), 268–293 (2005)
Kazakov, Y., Skocovsky, P.: Enumerating justifications using resolution. In: Proceedings of DL 2017: The 30th International Workshop on Description Logics (2017)
Konev, B., Kontchakov, R., Ludwig, M., Schneider, T., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Conjunctive query inseparability of OWL 2 QL TBoxes. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2011: The 25th Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press (2011)
Konev, B., Ludwig, M., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: The logical difference for the lightweight description logic EL. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 44, 633–708 (2012)
Konev, B., Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Semantic modularity and module extraction in description logics. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2008: The 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 55–59. IOS Press (2008)
Konev, B., Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Formal properties of modularisation. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds.) Modular Ontologies. LNCS, vol. 5445, pp. 25–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_3
Konev, B., Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Model-theoretic inseparability and modularity of description logic ontologies. Artif. Intell. 203, 66–103 (2013)
Konev, B., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: The logical difference problem for description logic terminologies. In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) IJCAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5195, pp. 259–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71070-7_21
Kontchakov, R., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Logic-based ontology comparison and module extraction, with an application to DL-Lite. Artif. Intell. 174(15), 1093–1141 (2010)
Lehmann, K., Turhan, A.-Y.: A framework for semantic-based similarity measures for \(\cal{ELH}\)-concepts. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds.) JELIA 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7519, pp. 307–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_24
Ludwig, M., Walther, D.: The logical difference for \(\cal{ELH}^{r}\)-terminologies using hypergraphs. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2014: The 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 555–560 (2014)
Romero, A.A., Kaminski, M., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I.: Module extraction in expressive ontology languages via datalog reasoning. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 55, 499–564 (2016)
Sattler, U., Schneider, T., Zakharyaschev, M.: Which kind of module should I extract? In: Proceedings of DL 2009. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 477. CEUR-WS.org (2009)
Zhou, Z., Qi, G., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: A new method of finding all justifications in OWL 2 EL. In: Proceedings of WI 2013: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence, pp. 213–220 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, J., Ludwig, M., Ma, Y., Walther, D. (2019). Computing Minimal Projection Modules for \(\mathcal{ELH}^{r}\)-Terminologies. In: Calimeri, F., Leone, N., Manna, M. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11468. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19569-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19570-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)