Abstract
In this article the notion of relation work will be put forward to describe efforts of connecting people and artefacts in a multitude of ways as part of facilitating global interaction and coordination in an engineering firm. Relation work can be seen as a parallel to the concept of articulation work. Articulation work describes efforts of coordination necessary in cooperative work, but, arguably, focuses mainly on taskspecific aspects of cooperative work. As a supplement, the concept of relation work focuses on the fundamental relational aspect of cooperative work. Relation work forms the fundamental activities of creating socio-technical connections between people and artefacts during collaborative activities required to create and enact the human and electronic network and engage with articulation work in cooperative engagements. The concept of relation work is applied within an ethnographic study of War Room meetings in a Global engineering firm. It is argued that relation work is a perquisite for other activities such as articulation work. Relation work is described in a number of dimensions, including connecting people with people, people with artefacts, and artefacts with other artefacts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T. J. (1977): Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bardram, J. E., and Bossen, C. A. (2005): A web of coordinative artifacts: collaborative work at a hospital ward., In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, November 06 - 09, 2005). Sanibel Island, Florida, USA: ACM Press, NY.
Bjørn, P. (2003): Re-Negotiating Protocols: A way to Integrate Groupware in Collaborative Learning Settings. Paper presented at the ECIS, New Paradigms in Organizations, Markets and Society, Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information System, Napoli 19–21 June.
Bjørn, P., and Ngwenyama, O. (2010): Technology Alignment: A New Area in Virtual Team Research. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 53(4).
Covi, L., Olson, J., Rocco, E., Miller, W., and Allie, P. (1998): A Room of Your Own: What Do We Learn about Support of Teamwork from Assessing Teams in Dedicated Project Rooms? In Cooperative Buildings: Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture (Vol. 1370, pp. 53–65): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
Gerson, E. M., and Star, S. L. (1986): Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4(3), pp. 257–270.
Harper, R. H. R., and Hughes, J. A. (1993): What a f-ing system! send ’em all to the same place and then expect us to stop them hitting: Making technology work in air traffic control. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in Working Order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 127–144): Routlege.
Harper, R. H. R., Hughes, J. A., and Shapiro, D. Z. (1989a): Working in harmony: An examination of computer technology in air traffic control., Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Gatwick, London, 13–15 September, 1989 (pp. 73–86). Gatwick.
Harper, R. R., Hughes, J. A., and Shapiro, D. Z. (1989b): The Functionality of Flight Strips in ATC Work. The report for the Civil Aviation Authority: Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University..
Heath, C., and Luff, P. (1992): Collaboration and control: Crisis mangement and multimedia technology in London Underground control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) An International Journal, 1(1–2), pp. 69–94.
Heath, C., Svensson, M. S., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., and Lehn, D. (2002): Configuring Awarness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, pp. 317–347.
Heath, C. C., and Luff, P. (1996): Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work. (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herbsleb, D., and Grinter, R. E. (1999): Splitting the Organization and Integrating the Code: Conway’s Law Revisited., Int’l Conf. Software Eng (pp. 85–95).
Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., and Grinter, R. E. (2000): Distance, Dependencies, and Delay in a Global Collaboration, CSCW 2000. Philadelphia, P.A.
Kraut, R. E., Egido, C., and Galegher, J. (1990): Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration. In J. Galegher, K. R.E. and C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social Foundations of Cooperative Work. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Larsson, A. (2003): Making sense of collaboration: The challenge of thinking together in global design teams, GROUP (pp. 153–160). Sanible Island, Florida: ACM.
Mark, G. (2001): Extreme Collaboration. Communications of the ACM.
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. (2002): NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, 11, pp. 205–242.
Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. (2000): Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, pp. 139–178.
Randall, D., Harper, R., and Rouncefield, M. (2007): Fieldwork for design: Theory and practice. London: Springer.
Schmidt, K., and Bannon, L. (1992): Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal., 1(1–2), pp. 7–40.
Schmidt, K., and Simone, C. (1996): Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 5(2–3), pp. 155–200.
Strauss, A. (1985): Work and the division of labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1), pp. 1–19.
Strauss, A. (1988): The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), pp. 163–178.
Suchman, L. (1995): Making Work Visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), pp. 56–64.
Teasley, S., Cowi, L., Krishnan, M. S., and Olson, J. S. (2000): How does radical collocation help a team succeed?, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States: ACM.
Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. (1999): Meetings of the board: The impact of scheduling medium on long term group coordination in software development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, 8(3), pp. 175–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bjørn, P., Christensen, L.R. (2011). Relation work: Creating socio-technical connections in global engineering. In: Bødker, S., Bouvin, N., Wulf, V., Ciolfi, L., Lutters, W. (eds) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24-28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-912-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-913-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)