Abstract
The recent progress in Case- Based Reasoning has shown that one of the most important challenges in developing future AI methods will be to combine and synergistically utilize general and case-based knowledge. In this paper a very rudimentary kind of integration for the classification task, based on simple heuristics, is sketched: “To solve a problem, first try to use the conventional rule-based approach. If it does not work, try to remember a similar problem you have solved in the past and adapt the old solution to the new situation”. This heuristic approach is based on the knowledge base that consists of rule base and exception case base. The method of generating this kind of knowledge base from a set of examples is described. The proposed approach is tested, and compared with alternative approaches. The experimental results show that the presented integration method can lead to an improvement in accuracy and comprehensibility.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aamodt, A. (1991). A Knowledge-Intensive, Integrated Approach to Problem Solving and Sustained Learning. A Doctoral Dissertation-University of Trondheim.
Aamodt, A. (1995). Knowledge Acquisition and Learning by Experience — The Role of Case-Specific Knowledge. In Kodratoff, Y., Tecuci, G. (eds.) On Integration of Knowledge Acquisition and Machine Learning. Academic Press (in press).
Aha, D.W. (1992). Tolerating noisy, irrelevant and novel attributes in instance-based learning algorithms. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, vol.36, pp.267–287.
Armengol, E., Plaza, E. (1994). Integrating Induction in a Case-Based Reasoner. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.243–252.
Auriol, E., Manago, M., Althoff, K.D., Wess, S., Dittrich, S. (1994). Integration Induction and Case-Based Reasoning: Methodological Approach and First Evaluation. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.145–156.
Bamberger, S.K., Goos, K. (1993). Integration of Case-Based Reasoning and Inductive Learning Methods. In Proceed. of the First European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. SEKI Report SR-93-12. University of Keiserslautern, pp. 296–300.
Biberman, Y. (1995). The Role of Prototypicality in Exemplar-Based Learning. In Machine Learning: ECML-95, (Eds.) Lavrac, N., Wrobel, S., Springer Verlag, pp.77–91.
Barletta, R. (1994). A Hybrid Indexing and Retrieval Strategy for Advisory Case-Based Reasoning Systems Built with ReMind. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.49–58.
Cardie, C. (1993). Using Decision Trees to Improve Case-Based Learning. In Proceed. of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, pp.25–32.
Cost, S., Salzberg, S. (1993). A Weighted Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Learning with Symbolic Features. Machine Learning vol.10, pp.57–78.
Golding, A.R., Rosenbloom, P.S. (1991). Improving Rule-Based System through Case-Based Reasoning. In Proceed. of the 1991 National Conference on AI. The MIT Press, pp.22–27.
Hammond, K.J. (1988). Explaining and Repairing Plans That Fails. Artificial Intelligence vol.45, pp.173–228.
Kohavi, R., John, G., Long, R., Manley, D., Pfleger, K. (1994). MLC++. A Machine Learning Library in C++. In Tools with Artificial Intelligence Conference.
Koton, P.A. (1988). Reasoning about Evidence in Causal Explanations. In Proceed. AAAI-88, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, pp.256–261.
Lenz, M. (1993). Cabata — A hybrid Case-Based Reasoning system. In Proceed. of the First European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. SEKI Report SR-93-12. University of Keiserslautem, pp. 204–209.
Malek, M., Rialle, V. (1994). A Case-Based Reasoning System Applied to Neuropathy Diagnosis. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.329–336.
Manago, M., Althoff, K.D., Auriol, E., Traphoner, R., Wess, S., Conruyt, N., Maurer, F. (1993). Induction and Reasoning from Cases. In Proceed. of the first European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. SEKI Report SR-93-12. University of Keiserslautern, pp. 204–209.
Matwin, S., Plante, B. (1994). Theory Revision by Analyzing Explanations and Prototypes. In Michalski, R., Tecuci, G. (eds.) Machine Learning vol.4, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
Quinlan, J.R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
Riesbéck, C.K., Schank, R.C. (1989). Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Rissland, E.L., Skalak D.B. (1991). CABARET: rule integration in a hybrid architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol.34, pp.839–887.
Surma, J. (1994). Enhancing Similarity Measure with Domain Specific Knowledge”. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.365–371.
Utgoff, P.E. (1989). Incremental Decision Tress. Machine Learning, vol.4, pp.161–186.
Zhang, J. (1992). Selecting Typical Instances in Instance-Based Learning. In Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, pp.470–479.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Surma, J., Vanhoof, K. (1995). Integrating rules and cases for the classification task. In: Veloso, M., Aamodt, A. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60598-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60598-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60598-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48446-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive