Abstract
Design conventions are emerging in e-government models-on-the-Web but they are not based on evidence of analysts’ actual what-if analyses for purposes like policymaking. From field studies, we developed representations of policy analysts’ actual work and compared them to the assumed goals and tasks built into existing online models, inferred through goal-based requirements methods. We found a large gap exists and argue that current online models are impoverished because they ignore expertise users bring to bear on their work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antón, A. I. [1996], Goal-based Requirements Analysis, in C. Shekaran & J. Siddiqi (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE’96), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 136–44.
Blandford, A. & Green, T. [2002], From Tasks to Conceptual Structures: Misfit Analysis, http://www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/shortosmABTG.pdf (last accessed 2005-05-26).
Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E. & Mylopoulos, J. [1999], Nonfunctional Requirements in Action, Vol. 5 of The Kluwer International Series in Software Engineering, Springer.
Cockton, G. [2000], L’Avenir de L’Interface — The Future of the Interface, http://www.cet.sunderland.ac.uk/cs0gco/Avenir.doc (last accessed 2005-04-26).
Costantini, E. A. C., Castelli, F. & L’Abate, G. [2002], Using the EPIC Model to Estimate Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes and to Assess Desertification Risk, in A. Faz, R. Ortiz & A. R. Mermut (eds.), Sustainable Use and Management of Soils in Arid and Semiarid Regions, Vol. II, Quadema Editorial, pp.361–3.
Cushing, J., Beard-Tisdale, K., Bergen, K., Clark, J., Henebry, G., Landis, E., Maier, D., Schnase, J. & Stevenson, R. [2003], Research Agenda for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Informatics (BDEI), Final Report to the National Science Foundation (NSF) for the Research Agenda for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Informatics. Available at http://dgrc.org/dgo2004/disc/posters/tuesposters/rp_cushing.pdf.
Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R., Woods, D. & Roesler, A. [2004], Keeping It Too Simple: How the Reductive Tendency Affects Cognitive Engineering, IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(3), 90–4.
Feltovich, P., Spiro, R. & Coulson, R. [1997], Issues of Expert Flexibility in Contexts Characterized by Complexity and Change, in P. Feltovich, K. Ford & R. Hoffman (eds.), Expertise in Context, MIT Press, pp. 125–46.
Fildes, R., Goodwin, P. & Lawrence, M. [in press], The Design Features of Forecasting Support Systems and Their Effectiveness, Decision Support Systems.
Hsi, I. & Potts, C. [2000], Studying the Evolution and Evaluation of Software Features, in N. Schneidewind, L. Briand & J. M. Voas (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM’00), IEEECSP, pp. 143–51.
Jackson, M. [2000], Problem Frames: Analyzing and Structuring Software Development Problems, Addison-Wesley.
Johnson, E. [1988], Expertise and Decision Under Uncertainty, in M. Chi, R. Glaser & M. Farr (eds.), The Nature of Expertise, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.209–28.
Mirel, B. & Allmendinger, L. [2004], Visualizing Complexity, Informaton Design Journal 12(2), 141–51.
Pannell, D. [2004], Effectively Communicating Economics to Policy Makers, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48(3), 535–55.
Sutcliffe, A., Ryan, M., Doubleday, A. & Springett, M. [2000], Model Mismatch Analysis, Behaviour & Information Technology 19(1), 43–55.
Zachary, W. [1988], Decision Support Systems: Designing to Extend Cognitive Limits, in M. Helander (ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland, pp.997–1030.
Zeitz, C. [1997], Some Concrete Advantages of Abstraction: How Experts’ Representations Facilitate Reasoning, in P. Feltovich, K. Ford & R. Hoffman (eds.), Expertise in Context, MIT Press, pp.43–65.
Zigura, I. & Buckland, B. [1998], A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness, MIS Quarterly 22(3), 313–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mirel, B., Maher, M., Huh, J. (2006). User Needs in e-Government: Conducting Policy Analysis with Models-on-the-Web. In: McEwan, T., Gulliksen, J., Benyon, D. (eds) People and Computers XIX — The Bigger Picture. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-192-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-249-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)